Doug White wrote:
| On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Sandeep Joshi wrote:
|
| > I changed the disklabels on a few SCSI disks and now
| > I keep getting these "BTX halted" messages every time
| > I reboot.
|
| Lemme guess, you're running them in 'dangerously dedicated' mode.
|
| There is a bug in Adaptec B
Title: Free Rate Quote
"Refinance Your
Current Mortgage While Rates Are LOW!!"
HOME EQUITY LOANS *** JUMBO LOANS *** HOME IMPROVEMENT LOANS ***
DEBT CONSOLIDATION LOANS *** REFINANCE LOANS *** ALL ARE AVAILABLE TO YOU *** RATES AS LOW AS
3.95%
Mortgage
Hi,
Well, since nobody seems to be interested (I can't for the life of mine
understand why), thanks and a couple of (perhaps silly) questions.
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, David Rufino wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just thought I would mention my -STABLE NVidia drivers have been working for
> the past week, as far
Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> Alfred, John, thanks you very much for your answers. I expected
> something similar. Btw are there any smart ways to find out does
> underlying FS support inode concept or not? Yes, I know about
> vnode.v_tag, but comparing it with VT_UFS/VT_NFS/VT_MFS etc does not
> look
Søren Schmidt writes:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> It seems "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> > > It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > > Are there any planes to support
> > > > > > VIA 82231 south bridge
> > > > > > for UDMA33/66/100 ?
> > > OK, support has been added to -
Martin Kaeske wrote:
>
> Hello
> Because i want to learn more about the BSD-kernel i bought
> the book "The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating
> System" [McKusick, et.al.]. Now i come across the topic
> "Buffer Management" and i have a question: Is it possible
> that a call to brea
On 16-Nov-01 Mike Smith wrote:
>> I was hoping its easy enough to crack this myself (with some online
>> tips & references) but John Baldwin convinced me otherwise :-)
>
> The evidence suggests that my original analysis is correct:
>
>> Error message when the SCSI disk is attached to
>> the A
> I was hoping its easy enough to crack this myself (with some online
> tips & references) but John Baldwin convinced me otherwise :-)
The evidence suggests that my original analysis is correct:
> Error message when the SCSI disk is attached to
> the AIC-7896 SCSI BIOS v2.20s1B1
...
> cs=c800
John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > SUMMARY:
> > The boot disk (ad0 in attachment) is not the problem.
> > There are two other IBM SCSI disks attached to two Adaptec cards.
> > Its these other two SCSI disks-da0,da1 which are empty and
> > whose disklabels I played with. These cause a BTX error if
> > the
On 16-Nov-01 Sandeep Joshi wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> Mike Smith wrote:
>> The only real solution is to hot-plug
>> the disks, camcontrol rescan, then dd zeroes over the heads of the disks
>> and then re-lable them safely.
>
> Yep, that method works for now.
>
> I was hoping its easy enough to cr
Mike,
Mike Smith wrote:
> The only real solution is to hot-plug
> the disks, camcontrol rescan, then dd zeroes over the heads of the disks
> and then re-lable them safely.
Yep, that method works for now.
I was hoping its easy enough to crack this myself (with some online
tips & references)
It seems "."@babolo.ru wrote:
> > It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > > Are there any planes to support
> > > > > VIA 82231 south bridge
> > > > > for UDMA33/66/100 ?
> > OK, support has been added to -current, MFC will follow later...
> I extracted patch
>
> --- sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c W
> Doug Write wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Sandeep Joshi wrote:
>
> > I changed the disklabels on a few SCSI disks and now
> > I keep getting these "BTX halted" messages every time
> > I reboot.
>
> Lemme guess, you're running them in 'dangerously dedicated' mode.
>
> There is a bug in Adaptec B
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Sandeep Joshi wrote:
> I changed the disklabels on a few SCSI disks and now
> I keep getting these "BTX halted" messages every time
> I reboot.
Lemme guess, you're running them in 'dangerously dedicated' mode.
There is a bug in Adaptec BIOSen that they will not tolerate DD
Sorry for my error, the exact name of south bridge is VT8231
(from the manual I have in hands now)
Søren Schmidt writes:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> It seems [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Are there any planes to support
> > > > VIA 82231 south bridge
> > > > for U
> I changed the disklabels on a few SCSI disks and now
> I keep getting these "BTX halted" messages every time
> I reboot.
The most likely cause of this is that you're messing up the disks to the
point that your BIOS (probably your SCSI controller BIOS) is crashing when
it tries to read them.
On 16-Nov-01 Sandeep Joshi wrote:
> I changed the disklabels on a few SCSI disks and now
> I keep getting these "BTX halted" messages every time
> I reboot.
>
> They dont occur if I disconnect those disks. They occur
> even after I rewrite those labels. Its not dedicated mode
> or whatever
I changed the disklabels on a few SCSI disks and now
I keep getting these "BTX halted" messages every time
I reboot.
They dont occur if I disconnect those disks. They occur
even after I rewrite those labels. Its not dedicated mode
or whatever now..
I am currently running 4.4-REL.
I am wil
Hello,
this may be due to a bad block on your hard disk, in the swap partition
(matt ?)
TfH
PS : anyway, the "error 22" comes from some code (happy RTFS'ing !)
Dmitry Mottl wrote:
>
> Hi, All
>
> I got following error, while I say 'reboot'.
> Please, help me with description, what's
Hi, All
I got following error, while I say 'reboot'.
Please, help me with description, what's going on
Why 'pagein' and 'pageout' failed?
What is error 22?
Nov 14 18:07:00 spectre /kernel: swap_pager: I/O error - pageout failed;
blkno 1552,size 16384, error 22
Nov 14 18:08:03 spectre /kerne
Hello,
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Yes I saw this, I have no idea what 'JH' stands for either that's why
> I left it as is.
>
> The problem is that VTOI is ufs specific, this "fix" will break
> LOCKF_DEBUG for all other FS's other than UFS because it casts
> the vnode->data p
Hello
Because i want to learn more about the BSD-kernel i bought
the book "The Design and Implementation of the 4.4BSD Operating
System" [McKusick, et.al.]. Now i come across the topic
"Buffer Management" and i have a question: Is it possible
that a call to bread() can result in a buffer covering
22 matches
Mail list logo
