Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Michael R. Wayne
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 12:47:21AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 06:09:51PM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote: Using this ipfw rule on ProxyFirewall: fwd $(squid-box) log tcp from $(windows-box) to any 80 and checking the logs on ProxyFirewall, I see this horrible

Re: lpd filter stderr log files

2002-02-18 Thread Konrad Heuer
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote: At 3:16 PM +0100 2/15/02, Konrad Heuer wrote: Unfortunately, some changes in the lpd code that happened last year (as far as I remember) are very disadvantageous for the operation of our (heavily loaded) printer server which is based on FreeBSD

weird xl0 thing

2002-02-18 Thread Bri
I updated my machine to 4.5-RELEASE's lastest cvsup the other day because it was getting lots of crashes caused my the initial release of 4.5 something to do with vm pages but being found and going missing that seems to be fixed as it ran great after the cvs up but last night my computer was

Re: Porting a device driver from NetBSD to FreeBSD

2002-02-18 Thread Andy Sporner
Thanks Terry! Here is the sum total of my clue-fu on this problem; it is mostly supposition, because of incomplete information. Bill Pauls kung-fu in ethernet drivers is much greater than anyone else's... it beats the heck out of my cowering piglet style. ;-). The best advice *anyone*

Re: Porting a device driver from NetBSD to FreeBSD

2002-02-18 Thread Terry Lambert
Andy Sporner wrote: Yes and no. It *IS* an ethernet device--that's clear, but it has it's own stack (more or less) optimized for doing policy based routing, so it doesn't connect to the TCP/IP stack. The application is traffic management. We are expecting very high bandwidth traffic

Re: in-kernel HTTP Server for FreeBSD?

2002-02-18 Thread Andrew Boothman
Terry Lambert wrote: What about HyperTransport? (Not that I know anything about it, but those nice AMD guys keep mentioning it in sales garbage :) They keep mentioning SledgeHammer, too... Have you seen silicon for either one of them yet? I don't pretend to know much about any of this, but

Re: Porting a device driver from NetBSD to FreeBSD

2002-02-18 Thread Andy Sporner
Hi Terry (and other snoopers--readers :-)) I guess I should ask you if this is an SMP system and/or is the kernel compiled for SMP, or ist it UP (this is a two by two marix, so the correct answer is not yes/no 8-)). Monoproc machine. Standard (OUT of box config file -- GENERIC). Sorry, I

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Crist J. Clark
What precise version of FreeBSD are you running, BTW? -- Crist J. Clark | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/| [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: weird xl0 thing

2002-02-18 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Bri wrote: I updated my machine to 4.5-RELEASE's lastest cvsup the other day because it was getting lots of crashes caused my the initial release of 4.5 something to do with vm pages but being found and going missing that seems to be fixed as it ran great after the cvs

Re: file(1) returns amusing result

2002-02-18 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 01:23:08AM -0500, Dan Langille wrote: As part of my FreshPorts fun, I decided that after fetching a file from cvsweb, I should make sure the fetch worked. I decided to do that via file(1) and inspect the output. I was testing for ASCII, but that appears to not be

ptrace() bug?

2002-02-18 Thread Peter Edwards
Hi, I recently wrote a program that was using ptrace() to suspend a process, and resume it later. Maybe ptrace just isn't used enough, or maybe I just don't get all the reasons behind why it's implemented the way it is, but it seems to be somewhat buggy. (I'm bringing this up on -hackers rather

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Michael R. Wayne
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 05:49:46AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: What precise version of FreeBSD are you running, BTW? 4.5 RELEASE, as stated in original message. /\/\ \/\/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:01:17PM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 05:49:46AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: What precise version of FreeBSD are you running, BTW? 4.5 RELEASE, as stated in original message. Do these patches help? Index: ip_input.c

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:31:13AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:01:17PM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 05:49:46AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: What precise version of FreeBSD are you running, BTW? 4.5 RELEASE, as stated in original

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:38:52AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 09:31:13AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 12:01:17PM -0500, Michael R. Wayne wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 05:49:46AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: What precise version of FreeBSD

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread Hiten Pandya
hi all, As to conclude this thread (for me.), I have come to the decision of actually starting a project for making a BSD Licensed in-kernel HTTPd server. The project will be on SourceForge.net. As you all know, that when starting a project, a name is needed for project; I completely out of

Re: Porting a device driver from NetBSD to FreeBSD

2002-02-18 Thread Terry Lambert
Andy Sporner wrote: [ ... ] At this point, lack of information about the device makes it hard to offer advice. I can only offer the following observartions, and the rest is up to you: o You indicated that the Realtek interface has ovrlapping memory, if probed and attached.

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:04:58AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: Do these patches help? can you please summarise the problem and what the fix is trying to achieve ? I don't really understand what the problem might be, and the issue is Precisely for this reason, what is that your

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:09:28AM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 10:04:58AM -0800, Crist J. Clark wrote: Do these patches help? can you please summarise the problem and what the fix is trying to achieve ? I don't really understand what the problem might be,

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread Terry Lambert
Hiten Pandya wrote: As to conclude this thread (for me.), I have come to the decision of actually starting a project for making a BSD Licensed in-kernel HTTPd server. The project will be on SourceForge.net. [ ... ] To vote, give a +1 for yes, and -1 for no. o fhttpd (I donno what the

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread erik
hi all, As to conclude this thread (for me.), I have come to the decision of=20 actually starting a project for making a BSD Licensed in-kernel HTTPd=20 server. The project will be on SourceForge.net. I, too, have started one of these, already have it loading, but not doing anything :)

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread Julian Elischer
will it be able to send pages from the filesystem or just preloaded pages? How will you configure it? I can suggest using a netgraph module for the work as it can be connected to a netgraph ksocket node to receive the requests (jdp made all the changes needed to allow this to be done). It also

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Julian Elischer
that patch is an MFC of a fix that went into -current. it allows teh 'fwd' ing of packets from the 'input' filter to external machines.. i.e. this doesn't work without this patch: ipfw add 100 fwd 1.2.3.4 tcp from any to 1.2.3.5 80 in recv fxp0 On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread Jeremy Lea
Hi, On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:12:54AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: no idea on the name though forked stick? It fork's and stick pages out a socket. A graph is a forked stick diagram. The daemon as a forked stick. And is should be able to serve more pages than you can shake a forked stick

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: hi all, As to conclude this thread (for me.), I have come to the decision of actually starting a project for making a BSD Licensed in-kernel HTTPd server. The project will be on SourceForge.net. As you all know, that when starting a project, a

Re: Odd ipfw behaviour

2002-02-18 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 11:08:02AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: that patch is an MFC of a fix that went into -current. it allows teh 'fwd' ing of packets from the 'input' filter to external machines.. i.e. this doesn't work without this patch: ipfw add 100 fwd 1.2.3.4 tcp from any to

ACPI timecounter tests original fast version vs masked version

2002-02-18 Thread Matthew Dillon
Mike, did you get my email clarifying what the masking code does? gettimeofday performance: 1 process / fast acpi timer 514000 calls/sec 1 process / dillon acpi timer 366284 calls/sec (previously posted patch set) 1 process / dillon acpi timer

Re: ACPI timecounter tests original fast version vs masked version

2002-02-18 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Dillon wri tes: In anycase, I think this is reasonable especially if we explicitly use the fast code for those chipsets known to be good. I would like to commit it. It can handle *ANY* sort of ripple or fast-carry breakage, really any type

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Mon, Feb 18, 2002 at 06:02:54PM +, Hiten Pandya wrote: If someone has better ideas, please do not hesitate to pass me your suggestions. how about: actually write the code before annoying -hackers. how is JFS coming along... -- - bill fumerola / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ACPI timecounter tests original fast version vs masked version

2002-02-18 Thread Matthew Dillon
:My only worry here is laptops. : :If my laptop is connected to the wall-power when it boots it comes :up at full CPU speed during the probe and mask determination. : :Then I unplug it and the CPU speed drops by a large factor and :suddenly the mask is too tight for the CPU to get two samples. :

Re: ACPI timecounter tests original fast version vs masked version

2002-02-18 Thread Matthew Dillon
:My only worry here is laptops. : :If my laptop is connected to the wall-power when it boots it comes :up at full CPU speed during the probe and mask determination. : :Then I unplug it and the CPU speed drops by a large factor and :suddenly the mask is too tight for the CPU to get two samples. :

remove

2002-02-18 Thread Sonic16691
remove

[no subject]

2002-02-18 Thread DR.MRS MIRIAM ABACHA
FROM: MRS. MARIAM ABACHA C/O SHEWU ABACHA LAGOS - NIGERIA. 19TH FEB,2002 Fax: 234-1-759-0900 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ATTN:PRESIDENT/CEO, I am Mrs. Mariam Abacha, the widow of late Gen. Sani Abacha. Former Nigeria military head of state who died mysteriouly as a result of cardiac

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread Peter Wemm
Mike Silbersack wrote: On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: hi all, As to conclude this thread (for me.), I have come to the decision of actually starting a project for making a BSD Licensed in-kernel HTTPd server. The project will be on SourceForge.net. As you all know,

Re: In-Kernel HTTP Server (name preference)

2002-02-18 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: The problem is that our threads implementation sucks. The moment that thttpd has to do an actual disk read on freebsd, the whole thing comes to a screeching halt. Threaded http servers do not stand up to real-world loads on freebsd, unless there are

make in freebsd

2002-02-18 Thread Pankaj
hii all, I was wondering if anyone would put some light over the way 'make' works in freeBSD I mean when i go to /usr/ports/XYZ and type make it tries to fetch the sources and then compiles it Is it a feature in make? I want to make an covering

Re: make in freebsd

2002-02-18 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Tue, 2002-02-19 at 18:32, Pankaj wrote: I was wondering if anyone would put some light over the way 'make' works in freeBSD I mean when i go to /usr/ports/XYZ and type make it tries to fetch the sources and then compiles it Is it a feature in make?

usb header not c++ friendly.

2002-02-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
struct usb_device_info has a field u_int8_t class this causes C++ to barf. any suggestions? also, I'm trying to port the linux-hp-printer stuff to *BSD, it's located here: http://hpoj.sourceforge.net/download.shtml But I'm having a hell of a time mapping linux USB ioctl's to *bsd USB ioctls,

Re: usb header not c++ friendly.

2002-02-18 Thread Kip Macy
struct usb_device_info has a field u_int8_t class this causes C++ to barf. any suggestions? Don't use reserved keywords. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: make in freebsd

2002-02-18 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 08:02:13AM +0100, Pankaj wrote: hii all, I was wondering if anyone would put some light over the way 'make' works in freeBSD I mean when i go to /usr/ports/XYZ and type make it tries to fetch the sources and then compiles it Is it a

Re: usb header not c++ friendly.

2002-02-18 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020218 23:53] wrote: struct usb_device_info has a field u_int8_t class this causes C++ to barf. any suggestions? Don't use reserved keywords. uh, yeah it's not my header. It's the system header sys/dev/usb/usb.h it's gonna suck having to write a

Re: usb header not c++ friendly.

2002-02-18 Thread Terry Lambert
Alfred Perlstein wrote: struct usb_device_info has a field u_int8_t class this causes C++ to barf. any suggestions? Use the prefix udi_ for struct usb_device_info members. No comment on the printer stuff. -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: usb header not c++ friendly.

2002-02-18 Thread Kip Macy
http://web.netapp.com/engineering/projects/raidv2/testing/global/ uh, yeah it's not my header. Oh duh, sorry... If you do that then you have to modify all the files including it correspondingly. Will putting an extern C { ... } around the file not fix the problem?