* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020514 22:58] wrote:
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hmmm, I wasn't very clear ...
What I am proposing is a 'simple' fix that simply changes
p-p_flag |= P_ADVLOCK;
to
fp-l_flag |= P_ADVLOCK;
As Terry stated you can't do that,
SysV defines SIGPOLL, as well as Linux, Solaris, and (IIRC) Irix.
However, it is NOT defined in any of *BSD. In Linux it is
simple #define SIGPOLL SIGIO. Some apps need it, thought. What are the general
policy for this: keep as *BSD and patch every SIGPOLL-app accordingly, or modify
Hello guys,
Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini
PCI. After the new install FreeBSD on laptop I cannot dial out -
system doesn't see the modem. What should I do or where can I find
some info about it? (On windozz
Btw, Terry's implementation of this ported to 4.5-STABLE could be found here:
http://www.blackflag.ru/patches/nfs-client-and-server-locking-4.5-STABLE-20020312.diff
I've been testing it continuously for a month or so with an NFS server
on Solaris. Particularly, that was a combination of
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 09:25:21PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
Mmm, mail server tuning, something I have some experience in :-)
Just what I was hoping to hear!
First off, what are the specs of the server? Cpu? Disk? Memory? Network?
You mention it's a dual 800MHz. What kind of NIC does it have?
On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 16:23, Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
system doesn't see the modem. What should I do or where can I find
some info about it? (On windozz it works on COM4, so I try to trick
with device sioX but it didn't help).
It's almost certainly a Win modem.
I don't believe there are
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the
ADVLOCK VOP.
You'd really have to know when the lock list went to NULL, to get
any benefit out of it, since locking would still end
Eugene Panchenko wrote:
SysV defines SIGPOLL, as well as Linux, Solaris, and (IIRC) Irix.
However, it is NOT defined in any of *BSD. In Linux it is
simple #define SIGPOLL SIGIO. Some apps need it, thought. What are
the general policy for this: keep as *BSD and patch every SIGPOLL-app
Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini
PCI. After the new install FreeBSD on laptop I cannot dial out -
system doesn't see the modem. What should I do or where can I find
some info about
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:50:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini
PCI. After the new install FreeBSD on laptop I cannot dial out -
system doesn't see
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:50:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini
PCI. After the new install FreeBSD on laptop I cannot dial out -
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 02:11:10AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 01:50:45AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
Dmitry Shupilov wrote:
Sorry for non-topic question but HELP me!
I got laptop Compaq Armada m700 with internal modem Compaq 56K mini
Wilko Bulte wrote:
Do you mean ltmdm, the Lucent Winmodem driver?
Correct.
[ ... ]
Win2K calls it a LT Win Modem.
Definitely a Lucent.
Did your E700 work with -STABLE? The ltmdm thing didn't work
with some Lucent modems, in the same way the binary only Olicomm
driver wroked with
Already running the card and switch port in 100BaseTX FDX (forced) :)
Would use GigE if the switch supported it tho
Thus spake Matthew Dillon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :
It should also work if you force the GigE card into 100BaseTX mode,
assuming the switch can deal with it. Though
The following email address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] has been removed from the
Verba Volant Newsletter list.
If you did not cancel your email address or you wish to continue receiving Verba
Volant, please send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you and best regards,
Verba Volant
To Unsubscribe:
All,
I have a need to be able to determine the amount of physical
memory in
a machine. Looking at the man page for sysctl(), that seems to be the
answer, but it behaves a oddly in that it doesn't return what I feel is
the actual amount of RAM in the machine. It appears to be taking
A thousand pardons for the duplicate post - forgot the subject on the
original!!
---
All,
I have a need to be able to determine the amount of physical
memory in
a machine. Looking at the man page for sysctl(), that seems to be the
answer, but it behaves a oddly in that it doesn't
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020515 01:36] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the
ADVLOCK VOP.
You'd really have to know when the lock list went to NULL,
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
:* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020515 01:36] wrote:
: Alfred Perlstein wrote:
: As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
: VNODE has a lock, that would reduce the requirement for calling the
: ADVLOCK VOP.
: You'd
* Andrew R. Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020515 09:54] wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
:* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020515 01:36] wrote:
: Alfred Perlstein wrote:
: As Terry stated you can't do that, however you could cache that the
: VNODE has a lock, that would
Basically I have a program that does a lot of I/O and alloctes/frees a lot
of memory. The time command gives result like this:
6.239u 19.329s 7:59.76 5.3% 310+775k 3993+246io 7pf+0w
I want to know why CPU is running only 5.3% of the total time. I just
want know how long it is waiting for
On Tue, 14 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Richard Sharpe wrote:
Hmmm, I wasn't very clear ...
What I am proposing is a 'simple' fix that simply changes
p-p_flag |= P_ADVLOCK;
to
fp-l_flag |= P_ADVLOCK;
And never resets it, and then in closef,
* Zhihui Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020515 10:33] wrote:
Basically I have a program that does a lot of I/O and alloctes/frees a lot
of memory. The time command gives result like this:
6.239u 19.329s 7:59.76 5.3% 310+775k 3993+246io 7pf+0w
I want to know why CPU is running only 5.3% of
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Geoffrey C. Speicher wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
I'll see if I can put some time over the next few days into delving into
it and at least getting the first step (of making the locking work more
usefully) work.
Hi Matt. Just wondering if
What if most I/O are asynchronous writes and handled by a background
process (e.g. SoftUpdate syncer daemon or a special kernel daemon), then I
guess the wait should have something to do with memory or buffer. But I do
not know to to confirm this. Maybe some profiling or instrumentation (too
Do you know about performance in postfix? I have on FreeBSD (4.5) box
running postfix and delivering mail in 65.000 mailboxes... I know about
maildirs... but, how maildir would help me??? The postfix delivery agent
simply can't do the jog. This is because a lot of entries???
help please.
To
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
He could also maintain a local cache of this per vnode, basically
maintain a mirror of the lock list locally in order to see if a remote
op must be done.
I think we are talking past each other.
This is what I've been suggesting since my first message,
but suggested
Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
:He could also maintain a local cache of this per vnode, basically
:maintain a mirror of the lock list locally in order to see if a remote
:op must be done.
Isn't this sorta like coda?
Lock cache, not data cache.
It's sort of like:
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
Basically I have a program that does a lot of I/O and alloctes/frees a lot
of memory. The time command gives result like this:
6.239u 19.329s 7:59.76 5.3% 310+775k 3993+246io 7pf+0w
I want to know why CPU is running only 5.3% of the total time. I just
want know
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
What if most I/O are asynchronous writes and handled by a background
process (e.g. SoftUpdate syncer daemon or a special kernel daemon), then I
guess the wait should have something to do with memory or buffer. But I do
not know to to confirm this. Maybe some profiling or
A disk in remote 4.5-stable box started to develop bad clusters. The
hosting company replaced the drive for me. I now have a 4.5-RELEASE
system (they have 4.5-RELEASE drives as stock items).
The defective drive is almost mounted in this box. I'm tempted to tar the
old disk over to the new
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
The defective drive is almost mounted in this box. I'm tempted to tar the
old disk over to the new disk and get everything back running that way.
It's that or upgrade to stable, install about 30 or so packages, and
manually configure everything.
:
:Already running the card and switch port in 100BaseTX FDX (forced) :)
:
:Would use GigE if the switch supported it tho
Ack. Just rip the damn thing out and put in a normal 100BaseTX card,
then (if you haven't already). The whole system will probably be
happier.
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Omar Thameen wrote:
First off, what are the specs of the server? Cpu? Disk? Memory? Network?
You mention it's a dual 800MHz. What kind of NIC does it have? What is the
speed and duplex set to on it?
Dual PIII/800
2G SDRAM
2x18G IBM 10,000 rpm SCSI drives, running
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Dan Langille wrote:
A disk in remote 4.5-stable box started to develop bad clusters. The
hosting company replaced the drive for me. I now have a 4.5-RELEASE
system (they have 4.5-RELEASE drives as stock items).
The defective drive is almost mounted in this box. I'm
I run dnetc with an argument to run two (one for each processor). If
I realtime nice (not nasty) the processes, the computer freezes for a
few seconds every minute or two. If I have them only regular nice'd,
this does not happen.
I can make a login on the machine available if this helps.
Any
David Gilbert wrote:
I run dnetc with an argument to run two (one for each processor). If
I realtime nice (not nasty) the processes, the computer freezes for a
few seconds every minute or two. If I have them only regular nice'd,
this does not happen.
realtime nice = idprio? If so, probably
Someone on this list emailed me about a problem in the distributed
folding client a while ago...
Howard has an updated version, can people having problems with it try
to see if it fixes the problem or not?
Also, I don't have access to the source of the client.
Rayson
P.S. Here's his message:
The fixed version is not up yet, I will be posting it tomorrow. I have
confirmed that the networking timeouts if you were having them, have been
fixed. (By updating to a new version of the networking layer).
Rayson Ho wrote:
Someone on this list emailed me about a problem in the distributed
There is a backdoor in all versions of FreeBSD that are not compiled
from source code within portmapper and telnetd.
Hmm. Let's check out this logic. The binaries that ship on the FreeBSD
distros are compiled from source. When I upgrade my system, I compile from
source. And the backdoor
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
There is a backdoor in all versions of FreeBSD that are not compiled
from source code within portmapper and telnetd.
Hmm. Let's check out this logic. The binaries that ship on the FreeBSD
distros are compiled from source. When I upgrade my system, I compile from
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Terry Lambert writes:
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
There is a backdoor in all versions of FreeBSD that are not compiled
from source code within portmapper and telnetd.
Hmm. Let's check out this logic. The binaries that ship on the FreeBSD
distros are compiled
42 matches
Mail list logo
