On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
I thought that we hacked around this in the linuxulator 18 months ago
by transparently converting block calls into character calls behind the
scenes. Either this has been removed or something else is wrong.
This isn't the case
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
I thought that we hacked around this in the linuxulator 18 months ago
by transparently converting block calls into character calls behind the
scenes. Either
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 03:17:24AM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote:
Do we run on Spark 5? Someone's selling one and a monitor for 300 UK
pounds. Is it worth getting hold of?
Not for FreeBSD (sun4u only, I believe); SPARC 5 is sun4m (32-bit only).
I concur. The SPARC port is for sun4u only.
Guys,
I bought a Deskstar 120GXP that *doesn't* appear to do tagged queueing. I
was wondering if anyone else had encountered such a thing. It's somewhat
annoying; generally I buy IBM drives for precisely the reason that they're
meant to support tagging.
The device model ID is IC35L040AVVN07-0.
I would like to ask which aspects has this patch on security of a jailed
environment.
This patch enables the use of named or ircd in jails.
--- in_pcb.c.oldMon Mar 18 23:57:57 2002
+++ in_pcb.cTue Mar 19 09:52:45 2002
@@ -501,6 +501,8 @@
int error;
if
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:34, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Sean Farley wrote:
With write cache enabled it does perform better, but I would like
the new computer to at least equal the old system without it
enabled.
With all due respect, whether that's a reality isn't your
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
I bought a Deskstar 120GXP that *doesn't* appear to do tagged queueing. I
was wondering if anyone else had encountered such a thing. It's somewhat
annoying; generally I buy IBM drives for precisely the reason that they're
meant to support tagging.
You think the Ultra 5 is one of the worst models Sun released? It's
not a real Sun? What are you guys smoking? Whatever it is I don't want
any. :o)
The Ultra 5 are very good machines. They are a workstation/small
server class machine and they serve their purpose very well. What? You
don't
Hello,
Just a quick question: with the recent (past 1-2 months) commits made to
CURRENT, is it possible to use more than 1 TB of disk space? (this would
be a hardware RAID array, accessed via SCSI as a single ID, so no ccd,
vinum or other magic)
Thanks,
--[ Free Software ISOs -
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Andre Hall wrote:
You think the Ultra 5 is one of the worst models Sun released? It's
not a real Sun? What are you guys smoking? Whatever it is I don't want
any. :o)
Please, for procmail's sake, take any further Sun-related bikeshed
painting to -chat. ;-)
Brandon D.
Dear All
as in stevens' Tcp/Ip illustrated says when a router see an unknown option
it must silently ignore it but when i put an option by type 253 len 12 and
10 byte of data
some router on my path drop it
how can i set an option an put 2 ip address in it that no router delete my
data
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Just a quick question: with the recent (past 1-2 months) commits made to
CURRENT, is it possible to use more than 1 TB of disk space? (this would
be a hardware RAID array, accessed via SCSI as a single ID, so no ccd,
vinum or other magic)
The i386 port uses the
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
I bought a Deskstar 120GXP that *doesn't* appear to do tagged queueing. I
was wondering if anyone else had encountered such a thing. It's somewhat
annoying; generally I buy IBM drives for precisely the reason that they're
meant to support tagging.
Exactly the same
It seems Hellmuth Michaelis wrote:
support. I asked for a cross update program to get IBM firmware; they
had none. They wrote one :-), i got it and now my drive does tagged
command queueing.
Well, I've always liked IBM's as well, anyhow do you still have the
update program ? I'd like to add
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
I thought that we hacked around this in the linuxulator 18 months ago
by transparently
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:52:37AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:47:33AM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 09:39:30PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
I thought that we hacked around this in
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 07:50:36PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
It took a while to find, but this is the hack I was referring to:
Take a look at /sys/compat/linux/linux_stats.c,
Thanks for taking the effort for looking this up.
However, the function in question - newstat_copyout - is not
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 01:35:43PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
Take a look at /sys/compat/linux/linux_stats.c,
revision 1.29
date: 2001/01/14 23:33:50; author: joe; state: Exp; lines: +18 -11
Instead of hard coding the major numbers for IDE and SCSI disks
look
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:59:21AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Just a quick question: with the recent (past 1-2 months) commits made to
CURRENT, is it possible to use more than 1 TB of disk space? (this would
be a hardware RAID array, accessed via SCSI as a
I hope it is acceptable to send this also to the hackers list, due to
the absence of traffic about touch pads on the questions list:
Original Message
Subject: i-Buddie 4: Synaptics touch pad FreeBSD support?
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:40:48 +0200
From: Guido Van Hoecke [EMAIL
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Guido Van Hoecke wrote:
So I went to see at http://www.synaptics.com/support/downloads.cfm and
found a pointer to a linux 'tpconfig' touch pad driver available at
http://compass.com/synaptics/ which has not yet been ported to FreeBSD.
This is just a laptop with a
Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 10:59:21AM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
Just a quick question: with the recent (past 1-2 months) commits made to
CURRENT, is it possible to use more than 1 TB of disk space? (this would
be a hardware RAID array,
Brandon D. Valentine wrote:
This is just a laptop with a touchpad. Chances are pretty good it's
supported out of the box by FreeBSD's moused and
...
Most of them just act like PS/2 mice.
Thanks, you're right: it works like a charm on the test notebook; I had
never thought to try it that
MY PERSONAL GOAL IS TO MAKE CERTAIN THAT YOU RECEIVE $60,000,000 IN 6 MONTHS OR LESS!
FACT #1
Those who get in on a proven successful program at it's birth are guaranteed
success!
FACT #2
THE UP WAS JUST BORN! YOU ARE AT YOUR DREAM LOCATION! THIS IT IT!
* JUST LAUNCHED!
*YOU CANNOT LOSE!
*WE
On 27 Sep 2002, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
You can put them into a special mode which allows you to do more stuff
with them (get absolute position and pressure information and the like).
I'd love to see FreeBSD get theremin support. ;-)
[ Orthogonally cool is using syntapics touchpad output to
If you want to get tpconfig to work (so that you can customise various
features of the touchpad), I have a PR that will allow you to do this.
It is a combination of a hack to the kernel, and a port of tpconfig.
Look at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24299
Can somebody explain to me how sysctls from klds are relocated?
For background, after the binutils upgrade in -stable, I'm unable to
load linux.ko on my desktop. The faulting address is always
0x9010102464c457f (oidp-oid_parent) and the pc is in
sysctl_find_oid_name().
The crash looks like
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Sean Farley wrote:
I just do not understand how a 5400 RPM UDMA 33 drive can beat a 7200
RPM UDMA 133 drive by 33% on sequential output blocks.
Rumor has it that newer drives cannot write a single sector at a time, and
instead must read a whole cluster of sectors, add in
28 matches
Mail list logo
