On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:57:07 +0300
Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy.
1.Is it true that kernel threads are more heavy than userspace
ones (pthread) and hence application with hundreds of threads will
work evidently slower than that using pthreads due to more switching
penalties?
Alex wrote:
I was so much enthusiastic about kernel threads implemented in 5.x but
some ugly rumors spoiled my dreams :0)
So I want to get if these rumors are myths or not.
5.x does not implement traditional kernel threads like you appear
to be thinking about them. Instead, it implements a
Miguel Mendez wrote:
On Wed, 26 Mar 2003 10:57:07 +0300
Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy.
1.Is it true that kernel threads are more heavy than userspace
ones (pthread) and hence application with hundreds of threads will
work evidently slower than that using pthreads due to more switching
Vladimir Yu. Stepanov wrote:
Hello !
I have a little question about BPF: how to determine incoming or outgoing
packet given into the user level mode. Current API do not supported this
or I are wrong ?
Unfortunately, there is no way of determining this fact.
However, there is a flag names
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Andrew Kinney wrote:
I'm going to expose my newbness here with respect to BSD
memory management, but could the number of files served and
filesystem caching have something to do with the PV Entry usage
by Apache? We've got around 1.2 million files served by this
Thanks for the answers, but why pam_ldap in FreeBSD, if i
can't authenticate in ldap servers?
Sorry, but i can't understand...
You did give me solutions with nis.. nis/gateway... where can
i find a official howto? The FreeBSD team do not talk about it.
The last question?
Why FreeBSD do
On 25 Mar 2003, at 19:28, Terry Lambert wrote:
Basically, you don't really care about pv_entry_t's, you care
about KVA space, and running out of it.
In a previous posting, you suggested increasing KVA_PAGES fixed
the problem, but caused a pthreads problem.
Will running out of KVA space
On 26 Mar 2003, at 13:29, Igor Sysoev wrote:
If you have 200M shared memory it takes about 50,000 PV entries per
process. 20 processes takes 1 million PV entries.
We've got about 11.1 million PV entries to play with, so I went
ahead and made MaxClients 150 just to ensure Apache couldn't
On Monday 24 March 2003 11:18, Daniela wrote:
On Sunday 23 March 2003 20:20, Wes Peters wrote:
The reason for creating the 5.0 release is to make it easy for more
developers and testers to jump onto the 5.x bandwagon by giving them
a known (relatively) good starting point. Quite a number
Why FreeBSD do not support ldap authentication? (nss_ldap)
files, nis, hesiod??? do we live in the past? One of great
things in 5.0 release for me, should be this! :)
Wait for FreeBSD 5.1.
Does that mean there will be official support for nss_ldap in FBSD 5.1? Is
it on the -current
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 08:14, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:18:43PM +0100, Daniela wrote:
Well, it's just a home server. I don't mind a few crashes, but security is
important for me. What do you think, should I go back to -stable?
If you're willing to put up with a few
Andrew Kinney wrote:
On 25 Mar 2003, at 19:28, Terry Lambert wrote:
Basically, you don't really care about pv_entry_t's, you care
about KVA space, and running out of it.
In a previous posting, you suggested increasing KVA_PAGES fixed
the problem, but caused a pthreads problem.
Will
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone here knows of a way to force specific programs
to stay resident (not swap) - specifically, I'm trying to see if there's a
way one could keep sshd out of swap, and then execute a shell and some
basic sysadmin tools (ps, top, etc), with the same swap-prevention, so
Hello. I've got a box which is booting up just fine with
an IP address, but as soon as I change my adapter to DHCP
and reboot it hangs during the initial network setup.
It seems that my router (a LinkSys 4 port DSL hub) is
sending bad packets and triggering the -1 rule. Then,
the DHCP process
Hi Kirill!
That's a real myth about Realtek :0)
We're using them on all our FreeBSD machines for over 5 years without
any problems. Driver is working fine.
Speed and reliability is OK. So I for one can even offer to choose them
instead of 3COM as in Russia you can easily get 2 from the 3 3COM
Hello,
I am trying to install FreeBSD into my personal computer, however I am
receiving error messages during the course of my installation. When I am trying to
install using the floppy method at the final prompt where the istallation program
requests me to put in floppy disk in drive
16 matches
Mail list logo