I was going to look at ficl-3.03 (our boot code includes 3.02) when I found
this claim about the new ficl-4:
"Ficl 4.0 is a major change for Ficl. Ficl 4.0 is smaller, faster, more
powerful, and easier to use than ever before. (Or your money back!)
Ficl 4.0 features a major engine rewrite. Previo
I just picked up two of these cards, but they're not supported and
aren't picked up by any of the other gigabit devices in LINT. Any help
that you could give would be great, I'd really like to be able to use my
new hardware.
- Ian
Device Info:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:10:0:class=0x02 ca
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Thomas Chaffic Mowad wrote:
> Someone thought that the kernel might need more memory so we tried
> increasing VM_KMEM_MAXSIZE too 500 megs and then that caused a panic when
> we booted up.
>
> So we're kinda stuck here and any help would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> -
On 09-Jul-2003 Harti Brandt wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just had a crash while typing ^C to a program that has a kevent timer
> running. The crash was:
>
> callout_stop
> callout_reset
> filt_timerexpire
> softclock
>
> and callout_stop was accessing freed memory (0xdeadc0e2). After looking
> some ti
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 15:28:38 +0200 (CEST)
Harti Brandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just had a crash while typing ^C to a program that has a kevent timer
> running. The crash was:
>
> callout_stop
> callout_reset
> filt_timerexpire
> softclock
>
> and callout_stop was accessing freed m
On a Tyan s2466 motherboard with 4 gigs of ram and freebsd 4.7-release-p10
we're having trouble increasing maxsockets beyond 128k. The kernel panics
when we try buildworlds with any more than 128k. We were able to increase
maxsockets to 192k with a system that had 2gb and 256k with a system that
Max Clark wrote this message on Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 13:27 -0700:
> :) hehe...
>
> Okay, let's say how do I force my machine to think it doesn't have any
> latency and saturate a 6Mbit/s link even though the link has 220ms latency?
You might want to try:
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=$((128*1024))
net.i
:) hehe...
Okay, let's say how do I force my machine to think it doesn't have any
latency and saturate a 6Mbit/s link even though the link has 220ms latency?
-Original Message-
From: Dan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 1:21 PM
To: Max Clark
Cc: [EMAIL PROTE
In the last episode (Jul 09), Max Clark said:
> Assuming zero (0) network latency what should I configure on my
> FreeBSD boxes to saturate a 6Mbit/s (750Kbyte/s) link?
Assuming zero latency, absolutely nothing :) You can easily saturate a
100mbit LAN connection (which has like a 12K bw*d product
Assuming zero (0) network latency what should I configure on my FreeBSD
boxes to saturate a 6Mbit/s (750Kbyte/s) link?
Thanks,
Max
-Original Message-
From: Dan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:41 PM
To: Max Clark
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: What ev
In the last episode (Jul 09), Max Clark said:
> > 600/8*.220 = 165Kbytes or 1.32Mbit/s
>
> I understand the BDP concept and the calculation to then generate the
> tcp window sizes. What I don't understand is this...
>
> How in the world is a windows 2000 box running commercial software
> able
> 600/8*.220 = 165Kbytes or 1.32Mbit/s
I understand the BDP concept and the calculation to then generate the tcp
window sizes. What I don't understand is this...
How in the world is a windows 2000 box running commercial software able to
push this link to 625KByte/s (5Mbit/s)
How can I ge
In the last episode (Jul 09), Max Clark said:
> When you say it's got a specific purpose, I am looking for something
> that will dynamically tune a 6Mbit/s, 220ms network link for bulk
> (500MB) file transfers. Is this what I think it is, or should I be
> looking at something else?
Unless you're d
The subject basically summarises it already.
My new MB has such a chip onboard and it would be nice
to be able to use it at some point.
A Linux GPLed driver is available BTW.
--
| / o / /_ _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte
__
Fantastic, this is exactly what I was looking for.
When you say it's got a specific purpose, I am looking for something that
will dynamically tune a 6Mbit/s, 220ms network link for bulk (500MB) file
transfers. Is this what I think it is, or should I be looking at something
else?
Thanks in advance
In the last episode (Jul 09), Max Clark said:
> Hi all,
>
> I am doing research on dynamic tcp tunning, what ever happened with the
> patch below?
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=200107150943.f6F9hhx06763%40earth.backplane.com&rnum=1
It got commited
Hi all,
I am doing research on dynamic tcp tunning, what ever happened with the
patch below?
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&selm=20
0107150943.f6F9hhx06763%40earth.backplane.com&rnum=1
Thanks in advance,
Max
___
[
Hello.
Strange problem on a new server we're setting up. It's very stable, except
when moving a large amount of data onto it via the network. I begin moving
approx 4GB of data onto it, and before the xfer can complete, the system
panics and reboots. (I am generally able to get from 1 to 2 GB tr
Hi,
I have experienced a kernel panic. It happened after doing shutdown. A small
gdb-typescript is included. If you need more information, you can e-mail me.
Lennaert
--
Last night I was layin' down...
And I hear momma tell poppa: "That boy love to boogie-woogie"
And I hear poppa tell momma: "Let
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
>Actually, a 2.4 could have HT.
>
>"Intel extends Hyper-Threading Technology? to a variety of desktop PCs, with
>the new Intel Pentium 4 processor, featuring an advanced 800 MHz system
>bus and speeds ranging from 2.40C to 3.20 GHz. Hyper
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:56:52PM -0700, Greg Kutzbach wrote:
> Motherboard
> Intel® VS440FX Motherboard
> http://www.intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/VS440FX/
> 84MB RAM
> IBM 40GP Hard drive
> removed all PCI cards except video
> Running Matrox MGA 4MB video
> Pentium Pro 200
> IDE Generi
Hi,
I just had a crash while typing ^C to a program that has a kevent timer
running. The crash was:
callout_stop
callout_reset
filt_timerexpire
softclock
and callout_stop was accessing freed memory (0xdeadc0e2). After looking
some time at the filt_timerdetach, callout_stop and softclock I think
Socketd wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 22:51:24 -0700
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm, why not just use a firewall?
Because most firewalls, even commercial ones, don't block the
ICMP messages you appear to be interested in blocking.
You appeared to want to turn your FreeBSD box into what'
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:51:24PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > > I don't want to disable ICMP, just don't want to respond when ttl=0,
> > > > meaning when my firewall/gateway is on a "traceroute path".
> > >
> > > You should specifically modify the ICMP code to not respond
> > > to echo datag
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 22:51:24 -0700
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hmm, why not just use a firewall?
>
> Because most firewalls, even commercial ones, don't block the
> ICMP messages you appear to be interested in blocking.
>
> You appeared to want to turn your FreeBSD box into what
25 matches
Mail list logo
