Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 23:40:05, des wrote about Re: complicated downgrade:
I need to downgrade a remote FreeBSD system from 5.1-release to 4.8-release
remotely without any local help (except possible hitting Reset).
Maybe if you tell us why you need to do this we can figure out a way
for you
Shawn wrote:
I did peruse the bugs list at the FreeBSD web site curious as to what
the current outstanding issue list was, and felt compelled to see if
there was anything left open that I might put my hand to and felt a bit
overwhelmed. I noticed that there are over 2,000 some entries with
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 10:46:36PM -, Larry Baird wrote:
5.x seems to have much better support for USB 2.0 as well. I have
a SanDisk 2.0 USB compact flash reader that just works with 5.1 release.
So far no amount of kernel hacking has made it work with 4.8.
Unfortunetly for me I
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:24:43AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Chad David wrote:
I assumed it was obvious that you could copy the data, but I believe
the intent of the original question was to find an alternative. As
far as I know there isn't one. A const is a const, except in C++.
Yes,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2003 15:00, Bernd Walter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
[I sent the same message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but since that list
seems not very active, I am asking
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:01:06AM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote:
Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 23:40:05, des wrote about Re: complicated downgrade:
I need to downgrade a remote FreeBSD system from 5.1-release to 4.8-release
remotely without any local help (except possible hitting Reset).
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 02:36:50PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
PR about this (with patch) back in April.
**(: HINT HINT :) **
( pr kern/51186 : http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern%2F51186 )
I'll take a look at this.
Thanks Bernd,
Joe
--
Josef Karthauser ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:20:30, bmilekic wrote about Re: complicated downgrade:
This sounds like the same symptoms as the latest USB problem...
when/if you track -current or even run one of the 5.x releases, it's
key to realize that this is very active code that you're running; it's
Robert Watson said:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
For example syscall is marking some range with mark()
function. For now
on this range isn't accessable from userland. If
process will try to
write to this page, page is copied (copy-on-write).
If this page will
be
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Adam Migus wrote:
Perhaps I'm not understanding you right but I think Pawel's idea is
cool. It seems to fulfill your requirements (except being network
specific). I suppose if it were network specific we could optimize it
for packet streams and if we made it
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
: On Monday 21 July 2003 15:00, Bernd Walter wrote:
: On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
:[I sent the same
Robert Watson said:
Well, the case I had particularly in mind was the rapid
flow of packets
form the kernel to the user process; Pawel's suggestion
handles the flow
of new data from the user process to the kernel well,
and has substantial
similarity to some of the IO Lite mechanisms I
I posted a message earlier to -stable, but maybe this a better
forum for this question. I have a print server at home running
-stable, and as part of bootup I run lptcontrol -e to enable
extended mode on the port (since it comes up in compatible mode, I
could set this with flags in the kernel).
Terry Lambert said:
The problem is that ktrace/kdump rendesvous at a file;
truss does
not, so it has some capabilities that ktrace does not.
In some
circumstances (e.g. a system crash, where kdump doesn't
get a
chance to get at the file, because it's cleaned up
and not
even fully
This only made it to one list the first time, trying again. These
newfangled computer things clearly can't be trusted.
-
Ok, so, it occured to me recently to try to convince nVidia to cough
up programming documentation for
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 02:04, Terry Lambert wrote:
There's a wide range of options, from the expensive to the free
online stuff. At the high end, we have:
$1300 https://www.mckusick.com/courses/introorderform.html
$1500 https://www.mckusick.com/courses/advorderform.html
Sadly, he doesn't
17 matches
Mail list logo
