It seems florian mettetal wrote:
>
> Now, I am at the Select Drives (Second screen) which menas that 5.1 does
> see my promise SATA raid controller. Now... I have 3 selections to use
> for drives, ad4, ad6, ar0
> First, I have 2 drives, and one is just a mirror of the other. my
> presumption is t
omestre wrote this message on Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 14:22 +:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote:
>
> Here is How i have made this task:
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54383
>
> I guess that is exactly what you want. I have posted a
> PR, and maybe the FreeBSD devel
taken from wine HQ:
http://www.winehq.com/?issue=186#NetBSD mmap Improvements
"On NetBSD (upcoming 1.6.2, and 1.7/2.0-current), there is a new extension flag
MAP_TRYFIXED that essentially simulates current Linux mmap behavior: try the
mmap() hint first, without clobbering mapped pages, even if th
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 01:08:50AM +, Nielsen wrote:
> > - is my assertion correct; that is, do I need to redundantly mount
> > the same NFS partition for each jail for each jail to access it?
>
> As far as I know, yes that's the case. If you're mounting the same system
> however you may wan
On Tue, 2003-09-09 at 02:54, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems florian mettetal wrote:
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have built a brand new system founded on an Asus P4PE motherboard, and
> > using the FastTrack raid function I have turned my two Maxtor 80GB
> > Serial ATA (now reffered to as SATA) hard
> As far as I know, that means that NFS partition has to be mounted
> (redundantly?) for each jail, even in (in my case), they'll all be
> access in the the same way (eg. read-only).
Yup, that's right.
> - is my assertion correct; that is, do I need to redundantly mount
> the same NFS partition
I have succeeded in getting a basic C++ module to function inside the
FreeBSD 5.1 kernel.
I figured I'd show the small example I have cooked up which uses basic
C++ constructs such a new/delete and virtual inheritance.
As suggested I have turned off exceptions have been turned off along
with
RTTI.
Apart from -fno-rtti and -fno-exceptions you will probably need to use also
-ffreestanding. Excerpt from gcc man page:
-ffreestanding
Assert that compilation takes place in a freestanding environment.
This implies -fno-builtin. A freestanding environment is one in
I can't believe nobody has yet suggested that FreeBSD switch to IOKit...
On Sep 9, 2003, at 12:38 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I've been silently following this thread, and unless I missed
something, has
:
I've successfully been exploring using NFS mounts within a jail.
It's clear to me that a host box running multiple jails needs to
expose that NFS mount to each jail.
As far as I know, that means that NFS partition has to be mounted
(redundantly?) for each jail, even in (in my case), they'll all b
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I've been silently following this thread, and unless I missed something, has
: anyone asked John why he wants/needs to use C++ in the kernel?
I refrained from posting the name of a good neurologist in Boul
--- Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>
> > Hi;
> >
> > Attached is a good reasons why someone my want to use C++ in the kernel.
>
> Sorry, I don't see anything here except "this is all we know how to do."
> But, I'm a curmudgeon. :)
>
To be go
> From: John Giacomoni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 00:29 America/Denver, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:12:59PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> >> On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:02:33 -0400
> >> "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I've
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 a.d., Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
> # slurping the whole compressed Perl source code into $a
> if (open F,"perl-5.8.1.tar.gz") { local $/; $a= }
I fortunately fixed that in perl 5.8.1, so when "slurping" regular files
the buffer is no longer grown by little steps with realloc.
R
> I don't know about __gxx_personaility_v0, but your best bet is to
> look at the .o's and find where it is referenced. Then back track
> it to what function, then to what construct and go from there.
The __gxx_personality_v0 stuff is actually related to distinguishing
between C++ and Java exc
On Tuesday, September 9, 2003, at 08:58 AM, John Giacomoni wrote:
On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 00:29 America/Denver, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:12:59PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:02:33 -0400
"Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
simple,
On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 00:29 America/Denver, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 11:12:59PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:02:33 -0400
"Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been silently following this thread, and unless I missed
something, has anyon
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:00:17PM +0800, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
> Maybe the test case can assist FreeBSD kernel hackers to make malloc
> faster.
This is a FAQ. For any algorithm one can come up with a workload that
makes it perform badly. The trick is making it perform well for
common worklo
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Josef Karthauser wrote:
Here is How i have made this task:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54383
I guess that is exactly what you want. I have posted a
PR, and maybe the FreeBSD devel team "think about it". :)
[]'s
Leal
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 21:54:18 +0100
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Attached is a good reasons why someone my want to use C++ in the kernel.
Sorry, I don't see anything here except "this is all we know how to do."
But, I'm a curmudgeon. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
"Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also it seems that linprocfs relies on procfs being mounted
> however I cant find any docs that mention this and see no
> reason why it should be the case. The problem I see
> is that I get errors from linux apps about /proc//file
> not existing. When
21 matches
Mail list logo
