How do your Windows XP computers get their ip
addresses: are they statically assigned ip addresses
or do you have a DHCP server?
If you have not configured your Windows XP computers
with static ip addresses or you don't know what a
static ip address is, then your hub is probably taking
care of D
This is the set-up:
I have a High-Speed Internet connection. What you would call a DSL modem connection.
I have the main modem connection hooked up to a 4-port hub. Two ports are connected
to WinXP boxes and the third one is connected to my freebsd box into the ethernet port
supplied by the
How do you connect (or want to connect) to your
network or to the internet? Do you have your own
private network and you connect through a gateway or
router, or do you have a DSL modem attached directly
to your ethernet card? You are not getting an IP
address and your netmask is for a very, very
Yeah - I have read it.
when I do the ifconfig i get:
vr0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
inet6 fe80::20e:a6ff:..[hexidecimal ipv6 address]%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopid 0x1
inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff000 broadcast 255.255.255.255
ether 00:0e:a6:.. [hexidecimal ipv4 address]
media: Ethernet autoselect (10base
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 07:12, Bosko Milekic wrote:
>
> If you read the paper on mbuma, you'll notice that I point out that it
> would be worth investigating whether, in scenarios where an m_tag is
> ALWAYS required per packet (e.g., MAC), providing a secondary zone with
> pre-allocated m
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 01:46:26PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
> S> allocated using this mechanism. I did it once for vlan tags but botched it
> S> (didn't handle module references properly) so backed it. But there's no
> S> reason s
In the last episode (Jun 03), Steven Hartland said:
> I've been trying to do a direct comparison of game server cpu usages
> across various OS. Our current primary OS is FreeBSD 5.X running a
> 200HZ kernel. Initial tests on a dual boot opteron showed Linux using
> 0% CPU for 32 player servers so I
I've been trying to do a direct comparison of game server cpu usages
across various OS. Our current primary OS is FreeBSD 5.X running
a 200HZ kernel. Initial tests on a dual boot opteron showed Linux
using 0% CPU for 32 player servers so I got suspicious.
>From talking to people it appears that Li
thanks Erich ,
i knew that i was missing some thing :-)
i got better idea about what you meant.
> Hi,
>
> talk about the devil:
>
> http://news3.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-06/03/content_1506278.htm
>
> This is a potential target application.
>
> Erich
>
--
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 10:56:52AM -0700, Sam Leffler wrote:
S> > are you going to convert mbuf tag allocator to UMA? Now
S> > tags are allocated with malloc(). AFAIK, tags are used heavily in pf,
S> > and forthcoming ALTQ. Moving to UMA should affect their performance
S> > positively.
S>
S> You
On Wednesday 02 June 2004 02:49 am, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> Bosko,
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 02:51:01PM -0700, Bosko Milekic wrote:
> B> mbuma is an Mbuf & Cluster allocator built on top of a number of
> B> extensions to the UMA framework, all included herein.
>
> are you going to convert mbuf
Hi!
Is the following patch to the emulators/rtc port right? qemu
(see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=67506) expects it
to send SIGIO and i'm not that good at kernel hacking to know
if the following is correct... it seems to work for me tho.
(Anyone interested in helping fixing the
Hi,
talk about the devil:
http://news3.xinhuanet.com/english/2004-06/03/content_1506278.htm
This is a potential target application.
Erich
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any
13 matches
Mail list logo