Dinesh Nair wrote:
On 03/31/05 20:51 John Baldwin said the following:
The problem is that the taskqueue_swi in 4.x doesn't have a thread
context that can be slept on via tsleep(). The fix would be to create
a kthread in which to run the ACPI tasks. 4.x already has one such
kthread for the
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Matthew Dillon wrote:
:The use of the XMM registers is a cpu optimization. Modern CPUs,
:especially AMD Athlon and Opterons, are more efficient with 128 bit
:moves then with 64 bit moves. I experimented with all sorts of
:configurations, including the use of
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:50:52AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
I'm looking at the impressive list of wireless network cards supported
by FreeBSD here:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/hardware-i386.html#WLAN
But, I have the specific interest of building an 802.11g WAP. I
seem to
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:28:42AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
I guess everything listed here, with a URL to an up-to-date list:
http://customerproducts.atheros.com/customerproducts
In perusing many of these cards specs, I see many of them offer a
'turbo mode' of 108 Mbps.
- Is
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:16:35PM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
In perusing many of these cards specs, I see many of them offer a
'turbo mode' of 108 Mbps.
That's a vendor-specific mode. I strongly advice you _against_ using it,
it's using at least one additional channel and only adds speed for
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 07:23:55PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
That's a vendor-specific mode. I strongly advice you _against_ using it,
it's using at least one additional channel and only adds speed for very
short distances. If you follow the common recommendation of leaving one
channel
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:28:42AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
I guess everything listed here, with a URL to an up-to-date list:
http://customerproducts.atheros.com/customerproducts
Another feature of some cards that I haven't found a clear picture
of:
Some cards have an
Brian Reichert wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 01:50:52AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
I'm looking at the impressive list of wireless network cards supported
by FreeBSD here:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/hardware-i386.html#WLAN
But, I have the specific interest of building an 802.11g WAP.
Brian Reichert wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:28:42AM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
I guess everything listed here, with a URL to an up-to-date list:
http://customerproducts.atheros.com/customerproducts
In perusing many of these cards specs, I see many of them offer a
'turbo mode' of
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:16:35PM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
In perusing many of these cards specs, I see many of them offer a
'turbo mode' of 108 Mbps.
That's a vendor-specific mode. I strongly advice you _against_ using it,
it's using at least one additional channel
On Sun, 3 Apr 2005 03:03, Brian Reichert wrote:
Some cards have an antenna built right onto the card, and others
seem to come with a remote antenna that hangs off of a six-foot (or
so) cable.
The vendors' arguments for the cable arrangment is that it allows
for a more optimal placement of
On 04/02/05 14:05 Nate Lawson said the following:
Dinesh Nair wrote:
On 03/31/05 20:51 John Baldwin said the following:
The problem is that the taskqueue_swi in 4.x doesn't have a thread
context that can be slept on via tsleep(). The fix would be to
create a kthread in which to run the ACPI
Sam Leffler wrote:
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 12:16:35PM -0500, Brian Reichert wrote:
In perusing many of these cards specs, I see many of them offer a
'turbo mode' of 108 Mbps.
That's a vendor-specific mode. I strongly advice you _against_ using it,
it's using at least one
13 matches
Mail list logo
