On 10/27/05 22:00 Scott Long said the following:
If you need to protect your pseudodriver from being interrupted by the
real driver then you'll need to use the same spl() as the driver. Note
that you shouldn't be using splhigh() unless you really know what you
the driver currently is set to u
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On 2005.10.26 10:22:52 -0700, Bill Studenmund wrote:
: | On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 10:35:47PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
: | >
: | > Main features:
: | >
: | > - Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
: |
: |
Søren Schmidt wrote:
On 28/10/2005, at 23:45, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Indeed, 55C is way to high for 24/7 usage, and it might be that the
drive is choking on it and barely is able to compensate.
The reads are pretty quick... I'd like to be able to spin it down, but
ataidle is broken :-(
On 29/10/2005, at 1:09, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Hmm, that does sound as problems with that disk, or maybe disk vs
diskcontroller. Any chance you could try the disk on something else ?
I'll try...
One other thing, how much mem do you have in there ? more than 4G and
bounce buffering might ge
On 29/10/2005, at 0:41, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Look in smartmontools I provided patches for that, its not rocket
science you know...
This attitude -- on top of the API change itself -- is not really
encouraging
for ISVs, you know :-)
Sigh, ataidle is a hack and the author had no intenti
On 29/10/2005, at 0:03, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Ask the maintainer to get it [ataidle -mi] fixed, but be warned
experience
says it might hose your data...
The maintainer did not break it. An incompatible change to the API
did :) You
are, probably, in the best position to show us, how the n
On 28/10/2005, at 23:45, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Indeed, 55C is way to high for 24/7 usage, and it might be that the
drive is choking on it and barely is able to compensate.
The reads are pretty quick... I'd like to be able to spin it down, but
ataidle is broken :-(
Ask the maintainer to get
On 28/10/2005, at 22:48, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, 2005-Oct-28 12:45:27 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
No, just checked -- the hw.ata.wc is set to 1. Is there anything
else to look
at?
That exhausts my ideas, sorry. Sören might be able to suggest
something.
Not really, however I have n
On Fri, 2005-Oct-28 12:45:27 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>No, just checked -- the hw.ata.wc is set to 1. Is there anything else to look
>at?
That exhausts my ideas, sorry. Sören might be able to suggest something.
>> >According to smartctl, the drive runs at 56C during the copying. Its
>> >id
On Thursday 27 October 2005 11:34 am, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Daniel Rudy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I analyzed the source code for devinfo(8) and used as an example of how
> : to use the devinfo(3) library. So I knew it transversed the device t
>
> You can set NOCLEAN in your environment. That will save you from
> having to rebuild things that didn't change. Major time saver if
> you're only working in a couple of files.
It's NO_CLEAN actually, and for the kernel building, it's especially
NO_KERNELCLEAN
Antoine Pelisse
-Glenn
I would just like to add some numbers:
system: freebsd 6.0 i386
job: make buildworld buildkernel
When kernel and world are compiled with -g and
witness,memguard,invariants are switched on the job takes 120min.
With witness,memguard,invariants turned off it takes 66min.
1/3 More speedup when using
At 07:01 AM 10/28/2005 -0500, Sergey Babkin wrote:
| >From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Vaibhave Agarwal wrote:
| >
| >> How do u disable malloc debugging flags in the userland? I read
| >> somewhere that " ln -s aj /etc/malloc.conf" disables malloc debugging.
| >> H
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 04:53:35PM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> >>> - Implements FreeBSD's devfs on NetBSD.
> >> In the past, we (NetBSD folks) have talked about a devfs.
> >> [...persistence...]
> > FreeBSD 5+ has /etc/devfs.conf and /etc/devfs.rules [...]. Is that
> > what you're looking for?
>
>
>From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Vaibhave Agarwal wrote:
>
>> How do u disable malloc debugging flags in the userland? I read
>> somewhere that " ln -s aj /etc/malloc.conf" disables malloc debugging.
>> How does it work?
>>
>> And how to disable verbose features in t
Hi!
I've got a new Hitachi drive with 16Mb of cache:
ad8: 476940MB at ata4-master SATA150
and am trying to use it to store backups online. Unfortunately, writing
to the disk is painfully slow (by today's standards) -- it can barely
keep 7Mb/second and my other (SCSI) disks run circles a
At 04:36 PM 10/27/2005, Daniel Molina Wegener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 05:14:51AM -0700,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 04:54 AM 10/27/2005 -0700, kamal kc wrote:
> | hello everybody,
> |
> | i am new to kernel programming.
> | i am developing a compression/decompression
> | functiona
In the file /usr/src/UPDATING, there is a following
statement
NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 6.x IS SLOW:
FreeBSD 6.x has many debugging features turned on, in
both the kernel and userland. These features attempt to detect
incorrect use of system primitives, and enc
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Vaibhave Agarwal wrote:
How do u disable malloc debugging flags in the userland? I read
somewhere that " ln -s aj /etc/malloc.conf" disables malloc debugging.
How does it work?
And how to disable verbose features in the kernel?
Apart from this, are there other ways to ma
At 07:48 PM 10/28/2005 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-Oct-28 01:18:03 -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
| >I've got a new Hitachi drive with 16Mb of cache:
| >
| > ad8: 476940MB at ata4-master SATA150
| >
| >and am trying to use it to store backups online. Unfortunately, writing
| >to the di
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Matt Emmerton wrote:
Recently I've had to do some low-level surgery on some disks that have
gone bad in order to recover some of the data. This has required me to
zero out blocks on disk, patch up the affected files, and pull the data
off the disks.
I was toying around
On Fri, 2005-Oct-28 01:18:03 -0400, Mikhail T. wrote:
>I've got a new Hitachi drive with 16Mb of cache:
>
> ad8: 476940MB at ata4-master SATA150
>
>and am trying to use it to store backups online. Unfortunately, writing
>to the disk is painfully slow (by today's standards) -- it can barely
>
On 10/28/05 10:52 M. Warner Losh said the following:
libc_r will block all other threads in the application while an ioctl
executes. libpthread and libthr won't. I've had several bugs at work
which is a Good Thing(tm) indeed for me on 4.x.
--
Regards, /\_/\ "All
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 01:18:03AM -0400 I heard the voice of
Mikhail T., and lo! it spake thus:
>
> According to smartctl, the drive runs at 56C during the copying. Its
> idle temperature seems to be 54C.
That sounds a little high to me. Smartctl has been weird lately, and
it only shows temp on
24 matches
Mail list logo