Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread prime
On 12/31/05, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I find that I can't include when I programming > > with libnet,because $(CC) complains that "struct ether_addr redefined". > > But I need some definitions in ,struct ether_header etc. > > Currently,I just copy the definitions I need f

Re: Preserve date when cp over smbfs

2005-12-31 Thread Gilbert Cao
On Fri, Dec 30, 2005 at 05:48:56PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Gilbert Cao wrote: > > Hi, the list. > > > > I have recently notice a problem when I copy a file to a SMB mount > > directory : > > Thanks for the good detective work. Can you send-pr this so that it does not > get lost? Yep, it is d

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread ari edelkind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On 12/31/05, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I find that I can't include when I programming > > > with libnet,because $(CC) complains that "struct ether_addr redefined". > > > But I need some definitions in ,struct ether_header etc. > > > Currentl

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread Gilbert Fernandes
> - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:55:38 +0800 > From: prime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: prime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0 > To: Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 12/31/05, Gilbert Fer

Re: My wish list for 6.1

2005-12-31 Thread Martin Cracauer
Robert Watson wrote on Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 07:12:23AM +: > > On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Avleen Vig wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 10:40:22AM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > >>> 2. SMP kernels for install. Right now we only install a UP kernel, for > >>> performance reasons. We should be

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread prime
On 12/31/05, Gilbert Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] - > > Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 20:55:38 +0800 > > From: prime <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Reply-To: prime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0 > >

Deadlock FreeBSD 6 / 7

2005-12-31 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Hi! I have some troubles with my notebook and any version of FreeBSD (starting with 6 since my sata controller wasn't supported earlier). It looks like as it would end up in a deadlock which means i have no access to the debugger nor to any other kind of tracing methods. Even with KTR, WITTNES

Re: Deadlock FreeBSD 6 / 7

2005-12-31 Thread Martin Cracauer
Armin Pirkovitsch wrote on Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 06:34:44PM +0100: > Hi! > > I have some troubles with my notebook and any version of FreeBSD > (starting with 6 since my sata controller wasn't supported earlier). > It looks like as it would end up in a deadlock which means i have no > access t

Happy new year! (empty body)

2005-12-31 Thread Alin-Adrian Anton
I told you it's an empty body, but this is probably why you opened it. Happy new year FreeBSD hackers, and thank you all for your work and efforts. Yours Sincerely, -- Alin-Adrian Anton GPG keyID 0x183087BA (B129 E8F4 7B34 15A9 0785 2F7C 5823 ABA0 1830 87BA) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-k

Re: Deadlock FreeBSD 6 / 7

2005-12-31 Thread Armin Pirkovitsch
Martin Cracauer wrote: Armin Pirkovitsch wrote on Sat, Dec 31, 2005 at 06:34:44PM +0100: Hi! I have some troubles with my notebook and any version of FreeBSD (starting with 6 since my sata controller wasn't supported earlier). It looks like as it would end up in a deadlock which means i have

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread prime
On 1/1/06, ari edelkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Did you read my post? > Or are you not on the list? I sent my response directly to the list, > not including you specifically. > > ari > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [...] > > In my opinion,struct ether_addr is defined both in > > and libne

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread ari edelkind
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Did you read my post? > > Or are you not on the list? I sent my response directly to the list, > > not including you specifically. [...] > I am on the list,and I don't receive your post. > I think you can send post specifically to me and cc > to the list :-). > Thanks

Re: Problem about libnet on FreeBSD 6.0

2005-12-31 Thread Matt Emmerton
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Did you read my post? > > > Or are you not on the list? I sent my response directly to the list, > > > not including you specifically. > [...] > > I am on the list,and I don't receive your post. > > I think you can send post specifically to me and cc > > to the l

Re: Deadlock FreeBSD 6 / 7

2005-12-31 Thread Martin Cracauer
> > It's more likely to be a general instability from broken hardware. > > > > Use prime95 (ports/math/mprime) to test your processor and thermal > > stability (36 hours or so), and memtest86 (seperately). > > I guess I should have mentioned that other systems work fine and run > stable (and mem

An idea of remove MUTEX_WAKE_ALL

2005-12-31 Thread prime
Hi hackers, I have an idea about remove the kernel option MUTEX_WAKE_ALL. When we unlock the mutex(in _mtx_unlock_sleep),we can directly give the lock to the first thread waiting on the turnstile.And a thread gets the mutex after he returned from turnstile_wait so he can simply jump out the _