On 2006-05-01 14:02, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Monday 01 May 2006 09:07, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2006-05-01 15:03, Daniel Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Alex Zbyslaw wrote on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:31:34AM +0100:
>>> [..]
>>> > >off by setting WITHOUT_BOOTEASY_BEEP in
On Tue, 2 May 2006, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
Hi Hackers,
I'm working on a threaded daemon and I'm trying to make it sysadmin
friendly. For this, I'm working with external signals.
I noticed different behaviour between BSD and Linux for this. When I
send an external SIGHUP (rehashing the c
Hi Hackers,
I'm working on a threaded daemon and I'm trying to make it sysadmin
friendly. For this, I'm working with external signals.
I noticed different behaviour between BSD and Linux for this. When I
send an external SIGHUP (rehashing the config file) on BSD the thread
receiving the si
Jamie Bowden wrote:
SunOS 4.1.4 (aka Solaris 1.1.?(1 maybe? It's been a long time now.))
was the final release of SunOS 4. It was basically 4.1.3_U1 with a
couple of other minor fixes merged in. I spent a very long time
porting software from SunOS 4 to Solaris 2.3|4|5 during that time as
we t
On Monday 01 May 2006 2:43 pm, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:29:31PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote..
>
> > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +, Maslan wrote..
> > >
> > > > On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 12:29:20PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:16:04PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> > Brooks Davis wrote:
> > >On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:13:22PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> > >>Brooks Davis wrote:
> > >>>On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:23:32PM -0500, Eric
When rebuilding a degraded plex with "gvinum start volume" on a mounted
filesystem, gvinum reports "errno: 16" (EBUSY). In the CVS:
src/sys/geom/vinum/geom_vinum_init.c, lines 363-364 (of MAIN, added
2005-Oct-09, rev 1.10.2.1) has the check:
if (gv_is_open(p->geom))
retur
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:16:04PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> >On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:13:22PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >>Brooks Davis wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:23:32PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Coleman Kane wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:13:22PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:23:32PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
Coleman Kane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:45:09AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
Actually, some other
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:13:22PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Brooks Davis wrote:
> >On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:23:32PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >>Coleman Kane wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:45:09AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Eric Anderson wrote:
>
> Actually, some o
Brooks Davis wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:23:32PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
Coleman Kane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:45:09AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
Eric Anderson wrote:
Actually, some other things got changed somewhere in the history, that
broke some things and assumptions
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:23:32PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Coleman Kane wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 09:45:09AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
> >>Eric Anderson wrote:
> >>
> >>Actually, some other things got changed somewhere in the history, that
> >>broke some things and assumptions I wa
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:29:31PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote..
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> > On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +, Maslan wrote..
> > > On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +, Maslan wrote..
> > On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing for
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:09:36AM -0400, Jamie Bowden wrote..
> On 5/1/06, Lucas Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
> >>
> >> That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
> >> www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
>
> >Sun OS is
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:47:54AM -0400, Lucas Holt wrote..
>
> On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
> >
> >That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
> >www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
> >
>
> Sun OS is how I got into BSD. My first sparc had sunos 4.21 on it
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:23:40PM +, Maslan wrote..
> On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing for
> >> doing Linux was that he wanted something like he had used at the
>
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:22, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> > On 2006-05-01 03:29, Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:15:44PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> I'd certainly prefer it if the beep was turned *off* by default,
> >>>
On Monday 01 May 2006 09:07, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> On 2006-05-01 15:03, Daniel Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alex Zbyslaw wrote on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:31:34AM +0100:
> > [..]
> > > >off by setting WITHOUT_BOOTEASY_BEEP in `/etc/src.conf'.
> > [..]
> > > WITH_BOOTEASY_BEEP so that it'
On Monday 01 May 2006 08:17, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
> Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>
> >I'd certainly prefer it if the beep was turned *off* by default,
> >but I'm not sure if that's what everyone prefers. This is why I
> >opted for keeping the current behavior and making my personal
> >preference an op
On Monday 01 May 2006 9:47 am, Lucas Holt wrote:
> On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
> > That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
> > www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
>
> Sun OS is how I got into BSD. My first sparc had sunos 4.21 on it.
> It was definitely
On 5/1/06, Lucas Holt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
>
> That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
> www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
Sun OS is how I got into BSD. My first sparc had sunos 4.21 on it.
It was definitely BSD.
On May 1, 2006, at 9:23 AM, Maslan wrote:
That's right, but sunos (earlier than solaris) was based on bsd.
www : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunos
Sun OS is how I got into BSD. My first sparc had sunos 4.21 on it.
It was definitely BSD. It makes sense considering Bill Joy co-
founded
On 5/1/06, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing for
> doing Linux was that he wanted something like he had used at the
> university he was at and he says it was SunOS. Sun OS / Solaris,
On 2006-05-01 15:03, Daniel Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Zbyslaw wrote on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:31:34AM +0100:
> [..]
> > >off by setting WITHOUT_BOOTEASY_BEEP in `/etc/src.conf'.
> [..]
> > WITH_BOOTEASY_BEEP so that it's off by default unless you turn it on
>
> Regardless what you d
Hi,
Alex Zbyslaw wrote on Mon, May 01, 2006 at 10:31:34AM +0100:
[..]
> >off by setting WITHOUT_BOOTEASY_BEEP in `/etc/src.conf'.
[..]
> WITH_BOOTEASY_BEEP so that it's off by default unless you turn it on
Regardless what you decide, if such an option is created, please
call it WITH/WITHOUT_BOOT
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-05-01 07:22, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe an alternate option is to compile both the beeping and a beepless
boot loader, and have the boot0cfg program install the right one
depending on a command line option? Hmm.. Maybe that's too cheesy..
On 2006-05-01 07:22, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe an alternate option is to compile both the beeping and a beepless
> boot loader, and have the boot0cfg program install the right one
> depending on a command line option? Hmm.. Maybe that's too cheesy..
It is kind of overkill
On 2006-05-01 13:17, Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>> I'd certainly prefer it if the beep was turned *off* by default,
>> but I'm not sure if that's what everyone prefers. This is why I
>> opted for keeping the current behavior and making my personal
>> preferen
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
At the same time I also patched so that NTFS filesystem was
recognised as "DOS", to get rid of the ?? on standard dual-boot
Win/FreeBSD machines.
Huh? I did that more than a year ago:
You beat me to it then ;-)
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-05-01 03:29, Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:15:44PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
...
I'd certainly prefer it if the beep was turned *off* by default,
but I'm not sure if that's what everyone prefers. This is why I
opted for
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I'd certainly prefer it if the beep was turned *off* by default,
but I'm not sure if that's what everyone prefers. This is why I
opted for keeping the current behavior and making my personal
preference an option :)
The beep didn't appear until 5.X (and generated quit
Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At the same time I also patched so that NTFS filesystem was
> recognised as "DOS", to get rid of the ?? on standard dual-boot
> Win/FreeBSD machines.
Huh? I did that more than a year ago:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/src% ncvs log -r1.14 sys/boot/i386/boot0/b
Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you watch Revolution OS, Linus points out that his main thing for
> doing Linux was that he wanted something like he had used at the
> university he was at and he says it was SunOS. Sun OS / Solaris, are
> straight BSD.
Wrong. Solaris is SysV with some BSD b
On 2006-05-01 03:29, Luigi Rizzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:15:44PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
> ...
> > I'd certainly prefer it if the beep was turned *off* by default,
> > but I'm not sure if that's what everyone prefers. This is why I
> > opted for keeping the
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 01:15:44PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
...
> I'd certainly prefer it if the beep was turned *off* by default,
> but I'm not sure if that's what everyone prefers. This is why I
> opted for keeping the current behavior and making my personal
> preference an option :)
i d
On 2006-05-01 10:31, Alex Zbyslaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
>>On 2006-04-30 22:34, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> This thread:
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020572.html
>>>
>>> mentions a patch to disable the boot manage
Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
On 2006-04-30 22:34, Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This thread:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-December/020572.html
mentions a patch to disable the boot manager beep, and also
discusses having it optional.
Does something like th
38 matches
Mail list logo
