On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:12:52PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > I've mentioned this a couple of times, but postgresql didn't scale
> > well [on freebsd at least] when I tried it last year. I hope to
> > revisit when I get time
I've been repartitioning some of our machines here and
found that using the following method sysinstall creates
corrupt filesystems.
1. Boot a machine using an nfs mounted /usr
2. Run: sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16 to enable writing
to the disk mbr
3. run sysinstall, Customise -> Label
4. Delete
Andy Hilker wrote:
>> Somehow freebsd-update find /boot/kernel/kernel on some servers and
>> patches it and on others not.
>
> Additional info:
> it seems that all machines where it does not work, have an SMP-GENERIC
> (i386) installed.
There's a bug in how FreeBSD Update handles /boot/kernel. B
>
>
> On 02/24/07 05:44, ghozzy wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> I'm creating a standard FreeBSD 6.2 ISO image that I can use to
> >> perform unattended installations into VMware Server
> virtual machines.
> >> I'm using VMSer
On 2/28/07, Sean Bryant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, Michel Talon wrote:
>
>>> Give me a few weeks, and if I can band together with a few people I
>>> wanted to try and port sections of portupgrade and its related tools
to
>>> C++ (and maybe do some
On 2/28/07, Sten Daniel Soersdal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 03:59:52PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:25:11PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the g
* Daichi GOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of the
> unionfs patchset-18. p18 is first patchset after its merged of
> FreeBSD. Our improvements works of unionfs are going step by step.
Are there still plans to add my whiteout policy patch?
Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Daichi GOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of the
>> unionfs patchset-18. p18 is first patchset after its merged of
>> FreeBSD. Our improvements works of unionfs are going step by step.
>
> Are there still plans to add
Hi Guys!
We have patch of unionfs that supports procfs/vfs_cache. With this
patch, you can use application that use procfs on unionfs.
unionfs patch for procfs/vfs_cache support:
document
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/request-for-test.html
For 7-current
http://people
Hi Guys!
It is my pleasure and honor to announce the availability of
the unionfs patchset-18. p18 is first patchset after its
merged of FreeBSD. Our improvements works of unionfs are
going step by step.
Patchset-18:
For 7-current
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p18.diff
On 02/24/07 05:44, ghozzy wrote:
Hi,
On 2/23/07, Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm creating a standard FreeBSD 6.2 ISO image that I can use to
perform unattended installations into VMware Server virtual machines.
I'm using VMServer 1.0.1, and I've hit a roadblock when sys
You (Andy Hilker) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have a strange thing here, maybe someone can give me a hint.
>
> Somehow freebsd-update find /boot/kernel/kernel on some servers and
> patches it and on others not. Both kernels are installed from CD
> (GENERIC).
>
> On those servers where it does not displa
[ For future reference, please don't cross post to -questions and any
other list. Thanks. ]
Konrad Heuer wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> after upgrading from 4.11 to 6.1
Step one would be to upgrade again to either 6.2-RELEASE or -stable.
Lots of good stuff happened between releases.
hth,
Dou
13 matches
Mail list logo
