Roman Divacky wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
>>> granularity and improving opportunities for ke
Joel V. wrote:
> As a lot of people recommended using tcpdump, here it is. The only thing
> that stands out, are hundreds and thousands of lines like this:
>
> 13:45:49.991592 IP 82.165.252.222.36887 > ns1.galandrex.ee.43077: UDP,
> length 9216
...
> That IP resolves to u15194704.onlinehome-server
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:48:50PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Using the NatSemi card an example, there is a 32bit WOL configuration
> register at offset 0x40 in the chip register space and bit number 9
> (the 8th bit from the right)
As usual I got the numbers wrong :)
Sorry if this is causin
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Kip Macy wrote:
I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP
has been extremely positive. I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs,
typically lots and lots of floating point operations. It used to be that
Linux beat FreeBSD hands down - now
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 10:53:59AM -0800, David Leslie wrote:
> Linux does support WOL for (at least) this SiS900 NIC
> (I can verify that it does work on this board), so
> maybe it will be supported in FreeBSD in the future?
Sure, it's possible.
Adding support for a card is not that hard actuall
> >>
> >> I just want to add my 2 cents, that my recent experience with FreeBSD MP
> >> has been extremely positive. I tend to use highly CPU bound MP programs,
> >> typically lots and lots of floating point operations. It used to be that
> >> Linux beat FreeBSD hands down - now FreeBSD seems to
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Roman Divacky wrote:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and improving opportunities
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 02:41:35PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> >
> >In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
> >granularity and improving opportunities for kernel parallelism by bett
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Robert Watson wrote:
In FreeBSD 8, I expect we'll see a continued focus on both locking
granularity and improving opportunities for kernel parallelism by better
distributing workloads over CPU pools. This is important because the number
of core
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, Christopher Chen wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 12:05 PM, Christopher Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 25, 2007 3:13 AM, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At this point, Giant is gradually becoming a lock around the tty, newbus,
usb, and msdosfs code, and we're large
On Nov 25, 2007 3:13 AM, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At this point, Giant is gradually becoming a lock around the tty, newbus, usb,
> and msdosfs code, and we're largely at diminishing returns in terms of making
> improvements in parallelism through removing Giant. In FreeBSD 7, the
On Nov 25, 2007 12:05 PM, Christopher Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2007 3:13 AM, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > At this point, Giant is gradually becoming a lock around the tty, newbus,
> > usb,
> > and msdosfs code, and we're largely at diminishing returns in terms o
Appreciate your quick response
> The sis driver supports at least two different types
> of cards.
Yes, among them SiS 900 series NIC. The NIC in
question is embedded on the Intel D201GLY/D201GLY2
desktop board (chipset is SiS662 NB + SiS964 SB). The
NatSemi DP8381[56] is the only implementation
cu
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 04:47:05PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 09:16:59PM -0500, M E wrote:
> > I am able to get "will wake on: magic", when typing "ifconfig" in
> > FreeNAS (built on FreeBSD); however, I am still unable to wake up the
> > box.
>
> I know that xl does n
Hey David,
(I'm Cc'ing this reply to hackers@ with David's consent.)
On Sat, Nov 24, 2007 at 11:31:24PM -0800, David Leslie wrote:
> Have an Intel ITX size board (D201GLY2) with a SiS 900
> NIC, which supports WOL and has a WOL-enabled FreeBSD
> driver, but does not actually wake after powering
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007, binto wrote:
From what I read in "The Design and Implementation of the FreeBSD Operating
System",said:
'However, most of the heavily used parts of the kernel have been moved out
from under the giant lock, including much of the virtual memory system, the
networking stack
16 matches
Mail list logo
