Re: NFS ( amd?) dysfunction descending a hierarchy

2008-12-03 Thread Danny Braniss
--hYooF8G/hrfVAmum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I seem to have a fairly- (though not deterministly so) reproducible mode of failure with an NFS-mounted directory hierarchy: An attempt to traverse a

Re: NFS ( amd?) dysfunction descending a hierarchy

2008-12-03 Thread David Wolfskill
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:20:32PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: ... i'll try to check it here soon, but in the meantime, could you try the same but mounting directly, not via amd, to remove one item from the equation? (I don't know how much amd is involved here, but if you are running on a

Re: NFS ( amd?) dysfunction descending a hierarchy

2008-12-03 Thread Danny Braniss
--vmttodhTwj0NAgWp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 02:20:32PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote: ... i'll try to check it here soon, but in the meantime, could you try the sa= me but

Re: NFS ( amd?) dysfunction descending a hierarchy

2008-12-03 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 04:15:38PM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote: I seem to have a fairly- (though not deterministly so) reproducible mode of failure with an NFS-mounted directory hierarchy: An attempt to traverse a sufficiently large hierarchy (e.g., via tar zcpf or rm -fr) will fail to visit

vm_map_entry for kernel virtual addres

2008-12-03 Thread Alexej Sokolov
Hello, If I allocate memory from a kernel module: MALLOC(addr, vm_offset_t, PAGE_SIZE, M_DEVBUF, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); how can I get a pointer to vm_map_entry structure which describes the memory region where addr is ? Thanks, Alexey ___

Re: TCSBRK not implemented in linux compat

2008-12-03 Thread Arjan van der Velde
Hi, thanks. I think for now I can work around this although it would be nice to have this implemented. Regards, Arjan On Dec 2, 2008, at 11:13 PM, Ed Schouten wrote: Hello Arjan, * Arjan van der Velde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: While trying to get a linux binary running on FreeBSD I

Re: tcsh loses the foreground process group?

2008-12-03 Thread Nate Eldredge
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Steve Watt wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: [ ... ] I'm running 6-STABLE (6.4-PRE as of 24 Nov right now), tcsh 6.15.00, which shows tcsh 6.15.00 (Astron) 2007-03-03 (i386-intel-FreeBSD) options wide,nls,dl,al,kan,sm,rh,color,filec as $version. The

Re: tcsh loses the foreground process group?

2008-12-03 Thread Nate Eldredge
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Nate Eldredge wrote: Thanks for the report. It looks like this is yet another manifestation of a problem in tcsh, where it does inappropriate things in a vfork'ed subshell. In my tests, running tcsh with -F (which causes it to use fork instead of vfork) causes the problem

Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE amd64 on Dell M600 Blade

2008-12-03 Thread Adam Jacob Muller
On Sep 12, 2008, at 2:03 AM, Karl Fischer wrote: On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 01:00, Steven Hartland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Rudi, would really like to get is sorted as they would make ideal app servers. - Original Message - From: Rudi Kramer - MWEB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi

Re: tcsh loses the foreground process group?

2008-12-03 Thread Steve Watt
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 03:58:36PM -0800, Nate Eldredge wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Steve Watt wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] Steve Watt wrote: [ tcsh 6.15.00 ] The symptom is that when I do a long-ish running task inside a `` expansion that I then ^C, nobody gets the foreground process