On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen si...@nitro.dk wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of cvsup-master
instead if that makes it more useful?
Can cvsup-master still lose
On Mon Jan 24 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsen si...@nitro.dk wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of
cvsup-master instead if that makes it more
On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremypeterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsensi...@nitro.dk wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up to sync directly of cvsup-master
instead if that makes it more
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
EGbsnmpd running with mibII module opens local socket /var/run/snmpd.sock
EGmentioned in snmp_mibII(3) manual page:
EG
EG The mibII module opens a socket that is used to execute all network
EG related ioctl(2) functions. This socket is globally
On 23.1.2011 23:58, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
Good day!
We are using custom php application on FreeBSD 8.1R amd64. It is started
with php-fpm 5.3.3 from ports as backend and nginx 0.8.54 as frontend.
Several times per day this app is making self unavailable.
I think it would be more
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Ivan Voras ivo...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremypeterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsensi...@nitro.dk
wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:33:25PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24.1.2011 9:13, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Peter Jeremypeterjer...@acm.org wrote:
On 2011-Jan-21 20:01:32 +0100, Simon L. B. Nielsensi...@nitro.dk
wrote:
Perhaps we should just set the tinderbox up
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
As long as it is not GPL.
Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
requirement. Of the major SCMs, only Subversion is non-GPL-ed (even
CVS is...).
___
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
As long as it is not GPL.
Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
IRL I'm known to be very dry humoured, I am deadly in e-mail or IRC.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
As long as it is not GPL.
Unless there's a missing smiley in that sentence there, it is a tough
IRL I'm
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:12:19PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 08:02:37PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 24 January 2011 19:31, Diane Bruce d...@db.net wrote:
...
But we don't compile CVS, SVN, etc
They both support pretty much the same feature set; here's a cute but
dated comparison:
http://importantshock.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/git-vs-mercurial/
http://wiki.freebsd.org/VersionControl
Table of features comparing SVN HG GIT MTN
http://wiki.freebsd.org/
section
Regardless of the benefits, unless there's someone to setup the
infrastructure to run things, we're not going to change.
We should at least have a master seed for git that people can pull from
before we talk about doing anything further. git has the ability to
pull from svn, so this should
13 matches
Mail list logo
