Re: listing all modules compiled into a kernel instance

2011-03-03 Thread Carl
On 2011-03-01 2:13 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On 2011-03-01 5:00 AM, John Baldwin wrote: Maybe ucom doesn't appear because it doesn't have a DRIVER_MODULE() declaration (because it isn't a driver). Yes, that would explain it. I can explicitly include ucom in a kernel by adding device ucom in

vm.phys_free

2011-03-03 Thread Dr. Baud
Can someone explain exactly what phys_free is telling me, I understand the three pools (DEFAULT, DIRECT and CACHE) and 13 orders of pages. But what does lcnt represent? [root@sn12 ~]# sysctl vm.phys_free vm.phys_free: FREE LIST 0: ORDER (SIZE) | NUMBER | POOL 0 |

Re: listing all modules compiled into a kernel instance

2011-03-03 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, March 03, 2011 3:03:02 am Carl wrote: On 2011-03-01 2:13 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On 2011-03-01 5:00 AM, John Baldwin wrote: Maybe ucom doesn't appear because it doesn't have a DRIVER_MODULE() declaration (because it isn't a driver). Yes, that would explain it. I can

Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread David Wolfskill
I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysctl OID values periodically, in an attempt to get a better idea how the resources of a system are being used during a long-running (usually measured in hours), mission-critical workload. In the process of testing this, I've seen some of the

Re: listing all modules compiled into a kernel instance

2011-03-03 Thread Carl
On 2011-03-03 7:08 AM, John Baldwin wrote: Ah, but your assertion is what is wrong. There is no 'apic' module for 'device apic' for example. Also, a single 'device foo' might enable multiple modules (e.g. if foo supports devices on both PCI and ISA buses, you will have foo/pci and foo/isa

Re: Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote: I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysctl OID values periodically, in an attempt to get a better idea how the resources of a system are being used during a long-running (usually measured in hours),

Re: Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote: I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysctl OID values periodically, in an attempt to get a better idea how the resources

Re: Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Fleming mdf...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, David Wolfskill da...@catwhisker.org wrote: I'm using a little shell script to capture selected sysctl OID

Re: Puzzled about VFS sysctl OIDs -- signed vs. unsigned

2011-03-03 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Matthew Fleming mdf...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Brandon Gooch jamesbrandongo...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 AM, David Wolfskill