r hardware that
> they want to test it on?
[chop]
I've got hardware I'd like to test on, but it's either running
8-CURRENT or 7-STABLE, not 6.x. Once source code is available, I'd
be happy to take a shot at porting it up to the newer codebase.
--
Alec Kloss [EMAIL PROTECT
pcm0: calling bus_alloc_resource
pcm0: failed to enable memory mapping!
pcm0: unable to map BAR reg
device_attach: pcm0 attach returned 6
Anyone got any ideas? Remote access is available upon request.
--
Alec Kloss [EMAIL PROTECTED] IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP ke
-specific initialization
> is the problem.
Beggars can't be choosers, so any time you donate to this project
would be appreciated by me anyway.
--
Alec Kloss [EMAIL PROTECTED] IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key at http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA241980E
"No Bunny!" -- Simon, from Frisky Dingo
pgpm3L15AU38O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
rts on
this hardware. If you're interested access to a machine, mail me
an ssh public key.
Thanks much.
--
Alec Kloss [EMAIL PROTECTED] IM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key at http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xA241980E
"No Bunny!" -- Simon, from Frisky Dingo
pgpybyUVnK6XZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Kenny Drobnack said:
> My question is: why did it do this?!?!? Also, how hard would it be
> to make things so it would look for ./~, then if that file/direcotry
> doesn't exist, then check for a home directory? Or is that even a good
> idea?
1) Don't crosspost.
2) You've essentially answe
Dodge Ram said:
> Hi,
>
> I am looking at ways to handle segV's gracefully without
> letting a process die. I am aware of the siglongjmp() call and don't
> know if that is the only way to handle segV's
>
> Any pointers on how to gracefully (?) handle segV and not
> letting the proce
6 matches
Mail list logo
