On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 01:17:31PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> i'm getting this on my computer.
> disk seems OK, smart shows nothing, dd reads whole partition without
> problem.
>
> no other errors from disk itself (AHCI timeout or so).
>
> started exactly after i rebooted with new kernel. ev
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 08:20:49PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> On 05/27/2012 13:08, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >Perhaps you can try asking on official nVidia FreeBSD forum:
> >
> > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=47
>
> I reported there 05-28-12, but go
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 09:46:23AM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> After the recent system upgrade that brought nvidia-driver-295.49 my
> system began to malfunction.
> Xorg randomly freezes and gets to 100% CPU (in kde4), switching back
> from the black terminal takes 30 seconds, some windows don't repaint
>
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 12:20:11PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 August 2004 07:07 am, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Judging from /sys/dev/drm/ contents, and listed kernel options in NOTES,
> > there's currently evidence of suppo
Hi there,
Judging from /sys/dev/drm/ contents, and listed kernel options in NOTES,
there's currently evidence of support for i810/830 chips in FreeBSD,
which (I suspect) is the probable reason why DRI is not enabled on my
box (FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT from yesterday, latest X.Org). I also found
traces
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 03:24:21AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:54:59PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Recently I've began to consider making some use of unionfs in
> > (semi-)production environment. Can someone aw
Hi there,
Recently I've began to consider making some use of unionfs in
(semi-)production environment. Can someone aware of its current status
in -STABLE comment a bit on this subject?
Probably any information would be appreciated.
Thanks so far,
./danfe
__
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 02:56:10AM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-05 ]
> [ Subjecte: Usenix 2002 FreeBSD Developer Summit III -- why no oggs? ]
> > Hi!
> >
> > I've read the notes as of 2 Septe
Hi!
I've read the notes as of 2 September, 2002 from the USENIX ATC 2002 FreeBSD Developer
Summit, which were made available recently. As a very good addition to
them, I suggest putting online some .oggs (or .mp3s) next time, with recorded
speeches, just like guys from recent linux kernel summit
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 11:49:59AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 13:28:21 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > < said:
> >
> > >> From IEEE P1003.1 Draft 7:
> >
> > You're looking at the wrong document. FreeBSD is very far from being
> > ready to implement POSIX 2001 he
- Forwarded message from Jef Poskanzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:44:55 -0800
From: Jef Poskanzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [THTTPD] THTTPD web server: problems with KQUEUE on FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE
I ran into this exact problem last week, in
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:28:29PM +0300, Eugene L. Vorokov wrote:
> > I still wonder, whether this problem occurs because of how thttpd does
> > things, or how FreeBSD implements kqueue stuff, however, I am not sure
> > that I will have enough time to dig deep into this. Right now I'm pretty
> >
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 02:29:30AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
>
> > I still wonder, whether this problem occurs because of how thttpd does
> > things, or how FreeBSD implements kqueue stuff, however, I am not sure
>
> I take it you don't have any logs for 4.4?
>
You mean, webserver logs on FreeBSD
the right
method of doing the non-blocking I/O, and, even in case I cannot use
kqueue, I am still curious which one is more preferrable for a webserver
to use, poll() or select() ?
Thank you very much for your time and concern.
--
Sincerely,
Alexey Dokuchaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > Ioctls allow user processes to make function calls within a device
> > > driver; they are a mechanism for exporting functionality from a device
> > > driver out into userspace.
> >
> > I know that, of course.
>
> This wasn't clear from your example
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > > Did I say I'm doing it from userspace?! If I did (too lazy to dig into
> > > > sent-mail), I beg your pardon :)
> > >
> > > Your FreeBSD sample involved making an ioctl call, so it must have been
> > > from userspace.
> >
> > Is anything wrong wi
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > > This code is used, actually, in char device driver.
> > >
> > > Mm, so what's it doing in userspace? 8)
> >
> > Did I say I'm doing it from userspace?! If I did (too lazy to dig into
> > sent-mail), I beg your pardon :)
>
> Your FreeBSD sample in
Hello!
I seems to have a lot of VM-relevant code to port, and I'd like to get
answers for several questions arised along the way:
---
* How do I port something like this:
. . .
static inline unsigned long
get_kvirt_address(unsigned long address)
{
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > > Hey, that's not fair :-) I'd like to know how to do things the rigth way.
> > >
> > > You'll need to tell us what it is that you're actually doing, then, since
> > > it's hard to guess from a tiny snippet like that. 8)
> >
> > Well, but if you di
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > > > Under linux, PCI stuff is generally done thru set of pci* functions, while
> > > > under FreeBSD there are ioctls provided by pci driver. I've been doing
> > > > some code migration from linux to FreeBSD, and got thru most of it, except
> > > > for
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Mike Smith wrote:
> > Hello there,
> >
> > Under linux, PCI stuff is generally done thru set of pci* functions, while
> > under FreeBSD there are ioctls provided by pci driver. I've been doing
> > some code migration from linux to FreeBSD, and got thru most of it, except
>
Hello there,
Under linux, PCI stuff is generally done thru set of pci* functions, while
under FreeBSD there are ioctls provided by pci driver. I've been doing
some code migration from linux to FreeBSD, and got thru most of it, except
for things like this one:
. . .
pcibios_read_config_
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Jose M. Alcaide wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >
> > Actually, there's one more question I have about XFree-4. IIUC, core GL
> > libs, such as libGL.so, libOSMesa.so, etc are included in XFree 4.0.2 core
> > distribution. So how come
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 12-Mar-01 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > That's what I thought, but Jordan's email really made me doubt that my
> > vision of things is correct. Particulary, I don't quite understand this
> > one:
&g
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 12-Mar-01 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> > > Meaning, 3.3.6 + utah_glx outperforms by a factor of two 4.0.2 + DRI?!
> > >
> >
> > Or, even better, 4.0.2 + "suppose-we-managed-to-port-it nvid
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >
> > > But, this is when using hw accel on 3.3.6 vs. software "accel" on 4.0.2,
> >
> > No.
> >
>
> Meaning, 3.3.6 + utah_glx outperforms by a factor of two 4.0.2 + DRI?!
>
Or, even better,
>
> > But, this is when using hw accel on 3.3.6 vs. software "accel" on 4.0.2,
>
> No.
>
Meaning, 3.3.6 + utah_glx outperforms by a factor of two 4.0.2 + DRI?!
- danfe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > So, are you saying that 3.3.6 performs better than 4.0.2? If this is true
>
> Absolutely. At least 2X the frame rate using the same OpenGL app in
> each case.
>
But, this is when using hw accel on 3.3.6 vs. software "accel" on 4.0.2,
right, like
On Sun, 11 Mar 2001, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> > 3D acceleration (or the lack thereof) is supposed to be one of the
> > reasons why XFree 336 is still the standard version delivered for
> > FreeBSD.
>
> It is, at least for me. I've been waiting for XFree86 4.0.x to come
> up to the same FPS perfo
Hello!
I'm quite interested in having true 3D hardware acceleration on my ASUS
AGP-V3800Magic video card based on TNT2 M64 chip, while running
XFree86-4.0.2 on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE.
I've been searching USENET, mail-archives, web, and all I was able to find
was:
* information on www.nvidia.
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Wes Peters wrote:
>
> You may want to look at http://www.trustedbsd.org/ as well. It is provided
> under the Berkeley license, and much of what is developed there will be
> folded into FreeBSD as time permits. The primary author of TrustedBSD is
> Robert Watson, who is now
Hello!
Some pretty good time ago, I accidentally found SecureBSD
(www.securebsd.org), which is a security patch for 3.4-REL and 4.0-REL. I
kept a note about this site, and that's about it.
Recently, reviewing my ~/cool.lynx file, I've found this site again.
Interested, I dloaded it (4.0 version
Hello!
Sorry for x-posting: I've heard somewhere that not too many ppl actually
read fs...
AFAIR, there was a conversation going on concerning ${SUBJ}. I remember
some thougths that -b = -f is sort of optimum, things like that...
Or, why 8192/1024 are installation defaults?..
What it the truth
33 matches
Mail list logo
