Claudiu wrote:
> I have also checked the SMART state of the driver with smartctl, it
looks like this: [...]
Same happens with my atapi cdrom from time to time. Could be messed-up IDE
channel.
But anyway, good time for a backup. Did you try a fsck -y..
Yours,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Spintech System
Viktor Ivanov wrote:
Hello -hackers.
I'm thinking about an utility to test a simple packet against the
machine's firewall (ipfw2 to be more specific). I needed it because on
some of my routers the configuration got complicated and the rule
count is too high. And sometimes I need to see quickly what
Joseph Dunn wrote:
Whoops, forgot the diff. It's attached.
Joseph
--- emu10k1.c 2004-06-09 11:26:37.0 -0500
+++ emu10k1.c.dell 2004-06-09 11:29:26.0 -0500
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
/* -
Per Engelbrecht wrote:
There is no upper limit.
ok.
I
great. got that.
do know that 128 addresses isn't a problem - depending of course
on your setup such as ram, cpu, board and last but not least,
nic. Don't do it on a $20 nomame-nic.
----- Original Message -
From: "Anton Alin-Adrian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Different ports? Why would be using different ports different? They (users)
need to go out to irc with a different IP each time they connect. In order
to do that, psybnc needs to use that specific IP when con
connecting outside to
the IRC server. I don't see how different ports will change this situation.
Nambased vhosts work for web, I guess, but not for IRC.
Let one correct me if I am wrong.
Thanks for all the replies. 240 IPs is far enough.
- Original Message -
From: "Anton Alin-Adria
Hi guys.
Can anyone tell me what is the limit for how many IP aliases can be setup
on the same ethernet card?
Is there a global limit for the total number of aliases in the OS?
To be clear: one needs 128 IPs (for irc vhosts) to be setup on one server.
Is that impossible?
Thanks!
Yours sincerely
Andrew Beals wrote:
Why is there no default pop3 implementation included in the FreeBSD
distribution? Is it for a lack of a suitably-licensed server, or does
everyone believe APOP authentication is crackable?
Is there any for IMAP?
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E
Yes, thank's everybody.
Unfortunately I thought I blocked this (old)mail message into the MTA's
queue, however, it seems it passed out today, by my mistake.
Regards,
--
Alin-Adrian Anton
Reversed Hell Networks
GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E)
gpg --keyserve
Hey folks.
Running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE
I am just wondering:
man fopen
---man---
Upon successful completion fopen(), fdopen() and freopen() return a
FILE pointer. Otherwise, NULL is returned and the global variable errno is
set to indicate the error.
---man---
However, the f
(and I receive thousands of those
things).
Is it you that mailed me privately on if_atuwi.ko, or was it somebody else?
I am sorry, I think it was somebody else (no results after a big search on
my inbox).
-Original Message-
From: Anton Alin-Adrian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
Daniel Ellard wrote:
And let there be light... DANG.. well it almost blinded me. I was
confusing with char[16], which has the +1 byte for the null
terminating, but the malloc(16) hasn't...
No, that's still not quite it...
char[16] allocates exactly 16 characters. Period. There's no extra
s
Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
* Anton Alin-Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-24 21:27 +0300]:
tmp = (char *) malloc(strlen(s)); // line 68
Hmm, you need strlen(s)+1 bytes to store the string -- don't forget
the trailing null byte.
Nicolas
And let there be light... DANG.. well it almost
Hello hackers !
Before anything else, I must mention I am running FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE, and
that is the OS where I encounter the problem.
I was developing some functions fooling around for parsing some bigger
opensource project's config file and look what happened:
There are many functions i
Craig Booth wrote:
Any guru out there that has the knowledge to provide some advice to persist
the use of the Linksys card beyond the first install? I tried this question
on
the Questions mailing list, but no one could tackle it, unfortunately.
Situation:
I have set up my Sony VAIO PCG-FRV27 l
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:25:08PM +0300, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
I am killing myself trying to compile http://www.vitsch.net/bsd/atuwi/
driver on 5.2.1-RELEASE.
Try the atuwi from my perforce tree.
BMS
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi folks!
I am killing myself trying to compile http://www.vitsch.net/bsd/atuwi/
driver on 5.2.1-RELEASE.
The driver is written for 5.1. I also received working sources from the
author, for 5.2.1-RELEASE but they don't compile.
I would really appreciate any hints.
I want to ask you if there i
Hi folks!
I am killing myself trying to compile http://www.vitsch.net/bsd/atuwi/
driver on 5.2.1-RELEASE.
The driver is written for 5.1. I also received working sources from the
author, for 5.2.1-RELEASE but they don't compile.
I would really appreciate any hints.
I want to ask you if there i
Hey folks.
There are rumors out there that setting /var/qmail/control/databytes to
a reasonable value (for example 16384 = 16MB) will prevent the
possibility of exploitation regarding the integer overflow in function
blast().
That is not true.
This is how blast() is called:
void smtp_data()
This patch attempts to implement rfc821 a bit. Also it defines the pos
var as unsigned. Working till now..
--- qmail-smtpd.c.orig Mon Jun 15 13:53:16 1998
+++ qmail-smtpd.c Mon Jan 19 23:29:35 2004
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+/*
+* This is a patched version of qmail, implementing RFC 821
regar
Dinesh Nair wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
Regarding latest qmail vulnerability, I coded this quickly patch.
Please double-check me if I am wrong here. Forward this to
freebsd-security please.
320c320
< ++pos;
---
if (pos>9) ++pos;
--- qmail-smtpd.c Mon Jun 15 13:53:16 1998
+++ qmail-smtpd-patched.c Mon Jan 19 15:22:23 2004
@@ -316,8 +316,8 @@
if (flagmaybex) if (pos == 7) ++*hops;
if (pos < 2) if (ch != "\r\n"[pos]) flagmaybey = 0;
if (flagmaybey) if (pos == 1) flaginheader = 0;
+ ++
This is the patch I am currently using, for qmail-smtpd.c . I don't dare
to touch RFC because I did not carefully read qmail sources and I am not
aware of details/impact.
I think this patch is good enough to simply remove the vulnerability.
I now looked more thoroughly at the code and ask other
Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
Regarding latest qmail vulnerability, I coded this quickly patch.
Please double-check me if I am wrong here. Forward this to
freebsd-security please.
Regards,
Alin
Anton Alin-Adrian wrote:
Regarding latest qmail vulnerability, I coded this quickly patch.
Please double-check me if I am wrong here. Forward this to
freebsd-security please.
Regards,
Alin.
320c320
< ++
Regarding latest qmail vulnerability, I coded this quickly patch. Please
double-check me if I am wrong here. Forward this to freebsd-security please.
Regards,
Alin.
320c320
< ++pos;
---
> if (pos>9) ++pos;
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I would like to thank again the FreeBSD hackers for their support during
this passing year, and I wish you all the best wishes I have for my own
self. Also I thank you for developing and hacking the best operating
system out there!
It may be a bit early for this, but I am going to spend the New
Martin Cracauer wrote:
Hi,
those who followed might have noticed I was shopping for a notebook to
replace some of my desktop system. To make it short, the notebook
vendors all pissed me off so good that I'm not going to get a notebook
(details on request) so I am going for other options.
Here is
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
29 matches
Mail list logo
