On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 02:45:16AM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
5.4-STABLE from 5/27, repeated panics. Finally got a crashdump, fired up
kgdb and:
(is there any advantage to booting the kernel.debug instead of the regular
kernel? Can't think
of one, but possibley...).
Unfortunately
On Mon, May 16, 2005 at 11:16:41PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
Doing a make buildworld from a directory other than /usr/src
results in the following:
[log]
/usr/obj/.usr/amd64/src/lib32/usr/lib32/libl.a -
/usr/obj/.usr/amd64/src/lib32/usr/lib32/libln.a
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:20:40PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Can SSE instructions be used in kernel / kernel modules?
Can floating point code?
This question is asked quite often..please see the mailing list
archives for discussion.
Kris
pgpL9IHYv5HDr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 01:39:23PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
So sounds like this does need a bit of looking at. The key thing is
both reboot and halt always leave the machine FS in a good state
where as shutdown -p doesnt so is there something that -p skips?
Or is it simply the fact that
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:38:37PM +, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
Hello.
I was surfing the dragonflybsd wiki site the other day and found out
that they are doing a base-cleanup. That is they are compiling the
tools that come with the base system with WARNS?=6 ...
Humm... This is
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 03:38:49AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
Seems like doing a shutdown -p now on the current
5.4-STABLE branch is resulting in FS corruption.
I've done this 4 times now and all but 1 time the
machine has failed to boot with a panic:
mod=0100600, inum=1271817, fs=/var
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 01:55:52PM -0700, Justin Bennett wrote:
All,
Recently my machine (FreeBSD) started showing 2 password prompts when
using su.
The first password seems to suffice, then hitting 'enter' on the second
one lets me in.
Any ideas what is going on?
Check your pam
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:28:50PM +0300, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
Hello,
I have a multithreaded application ported on FreeBSD 5.3 which crashes
in a minute or less if hyperthreading in enabled. Without HT there is no
problem.
How and where should I start to investigate the problem?
If it's a
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 03:05:38PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:28:50PM +0300, Adi Pircalabu wrote:
Hello,
I have a multithreaded application ported on FreeBSD 5.3 which crashes
in a minute or less if hyperthreading in enabled. Without HT there is no
problem
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:23:59PM -0800, Amandeep Pannu wrote:
HI all,
I am running FreeBSd 5.3-REL
Today my system simply locked up. There was no error sent to console, to
any logs, nor the monitor screen. It was totally unresponsive to network,
serial console, or keyboard. After 4
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 12:34:59PM -0800, Amandeep Pannu wrote:
Hi Kris,
I had this problem before and I changed the MB and the memory and today it
did the same thing it did before.
Continue to check power supply, CPU cooling, cabling, etc.
memtest doesnt give any errors.
OK, that doesn't
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 08:56:24PM +0100, Jos? Nicol?s Castellano wrote:
Hi!,
I'm making mknod to some devices in new system like /dev/ttyp0 and so
and i can't found a list of maj and min numbers.
Where can i found it?
On 4.x and older, the /dev/MAKEDEV script.
On 5.x and newer, devfs
On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 06:38:06PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
Hello!
The respected manual contain dire warnings, but the Google search suggests,
the situation is not *that* gloomy.
For example, according to http://kerneltrap.org/node/652 , nullfs was used on
Bento-cluster two years
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:41:08AM +0800, River wrote:
Hi, Everyone:
How can I debug the core dump file created by kernel panic? I try to
use gdb -core vmcore.0 (vmcore.0 is 4G file because I have 4G
memory) and the gdb said: this is not a vaild core file. Why?
Read the chapter on kernel
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:10:33PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Am I missing an easier way to do this?
May I suggest the following instead:
%%%
MANLANG?= foo bar
all:
.for i in ${MANLANG:N}
@echo foo ${i}
.endfor
%%%
Thanks for your analysis and helpful suggestion.
The following small makefile doesn't behave as one would naively
expect:
MANLANG?=foo
all:
.for i in ${MANLANG}
.if empty(${i})
@echo foo ${i}
.endif
.endfor
ports-i386%make
foo foo
foo
I think this is because the .if evaluation is happening too early, and
it's not being done after the
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 06:32:01PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
The following small makefile doesn't behave as one would naively
expect:
MANLANG?=foo
all:
.for i in ${MANLANG}
.if empty(${i})
@echo foo ${i}
.endif
.endfor
ports-i386%make
foo foo
foo
I think
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:47:42PM -0800, ALeine wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appreciate that not everyone is a fan of mutex synchronization,
but mutex hell is a bit of an odd description: most bugs I see
getting reported (and fixed) aren't even locking-related. They're
generally
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 09:39:50PM -, Marshall Kiam-Laine wrote:
(3) at no time did i see any option for 32/64bit install ?
FreeBSD/amd64 is the native, 64-bit version of FreeBSD. If you want
to run FreeBSD in legacy i386 mode, install the i386 version of
FreeBSD.
Kris
pgp16PvSjbRU1.pgp
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:39:39AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
After adding KDB, KDB_UNATTENDED and DDB, two of my 5.3-STABLE servers
never came back after a reboot. After talking to the datacenter, they
informed me these servers are trying to boot of /kernel and not
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:58:06AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a Dual Xeon 2.4 and a Dual Xeon 2.8 servers running with
HyperThreading, ACPI, and SMP enabled.
The 2.8 server won't stand for more than 5 days without crashing, and the
2.4 server was up 30 days crashed, now
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:58:27PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote:
Hi hackers,
I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] that
should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance
that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? Considering GNU's
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:07:48PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes
any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another
implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like
SVN. No, I'm
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 03:29:10PM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote:
--On Wednesday, December 01, 2004 3:02 PM -0700 Scott Long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
5. Clustered FS support. SANs are all the rage these days, and
clustered filesystems that allow data to be distributed across many
storage
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 04:37:06PM -0600, Kevin Lyons wrote:
I have (re)discovered that tcsh is not csh although the tcsh man page
falsely asserts backward compatibility. Trying to do a simple read of
multiword variables in tcsh fails yet works find on csh. The tcsh man page
admits as much
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:35:29AM -0500, Rob Deker wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering if anybody was working on porting the new
open-source Atheros HAL from OpenBSD to FreeBSD yet.
Why would you want to do this? Doesn't it provide a subset of what
the FreeBSD driver already provides?
Kris
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 09:22:13AM -0500, TWG Engineering wrote:
Dear group,
I am interested in setting up a server for my students at University of
Indianapolis with a virtual OS configuration. I have used servers with the
VKERN configuration. I have not been able to find information on
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 09:04:11AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote:
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 12:00:55PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 14:34:48 -0500
From: Robert Dormer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: pkg_add conflicts
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 12:19:23AM +0200, rmkml wrote:
Hi,
I running less with file more size 2Go
on fbsd v4.10R
and if execute 'G' on less cmd
G not seek on end file ...
Possible you have same pb/question ?
You should try talking to the less developers, since this utility is
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 04:43:27PM -0400, Lucas Holt wrote:
I had a problem like this only it was a weekly occurrence. I tracked
it down to the network card driver. After swapping out the network
card with a different brand/chipset, the problem was resolved. In my
case, i had entries in
On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:03:00AM -0400, Jim Durham wrote:
I have had this problem now with at least 3 FreeBSD servers over a period of
about 2 years. I had put it down to some hardware problem but it seems to be
too much of a coincidence with 3 different machines doing the same thing.
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 08:23:04PM -0400, Jim Durham wrote:
Actual spontaneous reboots are very rare
These are very rare except they seem to happen about once a day for a
while and then stop... very strange..
and usually caused by hardware problems (e.g. faulty power supply,
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 08:37:34PM -0400, Jim Durham wrote:
On Friday 01 October 2004 06:38 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Do you have ddb enabled?
I just recompiled the kernel (4.10 patchlevel 3) and installed it. It's in use
right now and I can't reboot it, but it may do so for me! 8
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 03:47:07PM +0200, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hi,
while playing around ifconfig.c, I needed to use gdb(1) on the generated
binary :
z6po:ifconfig# make clean ; make DEBUG_FLAGS=-ggdb make install
[...]
install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 ifconfig /sbin
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:31:57AM -0500, Sam wrote:
CERN's LHC is expected to produce 10-15 PB/year. e-science (the grid)
is capable of producing whopping huge data sets, and people already are.
Many aspects of data custodianship are still open questions, but there's
little doubt that what's
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 11:22:33PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 09:18:37PM +, Kris Kennaway wrote..
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 10:31:57AM -0500, Sam wrote:
CERN's LHC is expected to produce 10-15 PB/year. e-science (the grid)
is capable of producing whopping huge
On Fri, Sep 17, 2004 at 02:50:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of points:
1) No-one from the FreeBSD core team has participated in this
discussion so far.
2) Because you initially claimed that this was a security problem, you
prejudiced people against you because it's quite
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 07:32:54PM +, Thordur Ivar B. wrote:
While porting software from a friend wich was developed under Linux, I stumbled
upon an error: src/socket.c:236: warning: implicit declaration of function
`strnlen'
Now my programming experience is nothing to brag about but I
On Sun, Jun 06, 2004 at 03:49:13PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
amd64 is approaching critical mass for tier-1. There are a number of
developers that own amd64 hardware now, and a number of users who are
asking about it on the mailing lists. Peter is finishing up the last
blocking item for it
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 03:17:03PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 10:45:39PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
I cannot prevent you from committing this, but if it doesn't address
the items mentioned above, it may not be used on FreeBSD. Unless I'm
being
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 08:19:43AM -0700, John Uhlig wrote:
Well, Don Bowman was very helpful in suggesting some kernel parameters.
Unfortunately, they
did not work for us. If we had the time to experiment with more
settings, perhaps we would have
been able to find the right combination.
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:04:53AM +0800, Deng XueFeng wrote:
On Sunday 02 May 2004 01:26 am, Deng XueFeng wrote:
I found the htonl implemention in libc for i386 is not sync with the
kern.
sys use bswap for swaping the int. but libc still use xchg.
IS THIS LOST?
It's because
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:40:38PM -0700, John Uhlig wrote:
Hi.
We are running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p5 with a fairly generic kernel on a
Dell PowerEdge 2650 with 1/2TB of disk RAID arrays. It recently crashed at
about 3AM while running the daily /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:20:14AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-04-04 19:02:07 -0700:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:35:53AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Booting a kernel with random compiled in, and load_random=YES in
loader.conf causes a panic very similar to
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 02:35:53AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Booting a kernel with random compiled in, and load_random=YES in
loader.conf causes a panic very similar to the one described here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-alpha/2003-August/000656.html
Hi Mark, please fix
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 01:55:38PM -0500, Nan Wang wrote:
http://www.bsdforums.org/forums/showthread.php?s=threadid=20611
There are some partial patches in the GNATS DB that attempted to do
this, but no-one was able to fix them up so they work, and they seemed
to have since disappeared from
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 07:31:22PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004 15:44, Kris Kennaway wrote:
I have ktrace'd it and when I click 'Yes' on the CDROM prompt it only
seems to try and open fstab and mtab. It ends up with a FreeBSD fstab
and /compat/linux/etc/mtab which
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 03:26:27PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Has anyone got it installed under FreeBSD?
I got the demo to run and install pretty well (for some reason I can't play it
in KDE, I have to drop back to twm otherwise my system hangs), but the full
game doesn't install :(
I
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 07:32:15PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
Has anybody else seen Mozilla just start munching file descriptors the
longer it runs? I've seen it with at least Phoen^WFirebird 0.6 and
the current Firebi^WFirefox. It just keeps going 'till it maxes out
the system.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 02:14:42AM +0100, Mark Santcroos wrote:
Hi,
I know it was discussed once somewhere, but I can't find the thread in
question.
What I would like to be able to do is see the actual commit included in the
mail. I know it can't be done at the moment the message
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:00:01PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
I have not checked this with 5.x but...
/dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local)
/dev/ad0s1f on /usr (ufs, local)
/dev/ad0s1e on /var (ufs, local)
10.42.0.1:/usr/ports on /usr/ports (nfs, read-only)
10.42.0.1:/usr/src on /usr/src
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:50:34PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
getting really annoying..
Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 04:50:34PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Somewhere out there there is a ?Virus?/?Hacker?/?Spammer?
getting really annoying..
Yeah, but what do you expect anyone to do about it?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Feb 29, 2004 at 11:36:56AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
is there a way of knowing with which kernel-options a particular kernel
was compiled with (appart form the obvious config file)?
In general, no.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 03:52:16AM -0800, Wes Peters wrote:
On Sunday 15 February 2004 12:46, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Alexandr Kovalenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Could you please explain me this? Result is fully reproduceable. Please
note, that the only difference is the output file
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:17:03PM -0600, Paul Seniura wrote:
Hi y'all,
I'm trying to find a way to do a CFLAGS+='-O' if and only if such a
parm was not already provided before 'make' actually runs.
I had this coded with the single = sign, i.e. without ?= or +=, but
the process still
but the point seems to be the
ports that set -O2 explicitly are likely to work correctly.
On Thu 12 Feb 2004 17:13:25 -0800, Kris Kennaway replied:
That's not a good assumption; many ports simply add -O2 (or -O3, or
-O999) because the authors want their code to run fast. The set of
ports
On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 09:46:33AM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
hi,
i have 2 amd64s (one dual opteron, one athlon64), which behave
identicaly. Im trying to compile /usr/ports/x11-fonts, ports obj are
nfs mounted (on the the same server).
so things go nicely, but after a while
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:55:41PM +0300, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
Hello hackers!
Help to understand problem.
I have FreeBSD 4.9 on my box.
# uname -a
FreeBSD wall.ru 4.9-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p1 #24
I've tried to Upgrade it up to 5.1
# cvsup /etc/cvsupfile
# cd /usr/src
#
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 09:05:50AM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
I think we must wait until a 1.0 version is available.
SVN is meant to be a replacement to CVS. The projects repository is using
perforce which happens to be a good tool, so moving it to svn is probably not a
step forward
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:08:38PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
The ports freeze seems to last too long with recent releses. Or
maybe it's just I've gotten more involved, but out of the last four
months (2003/09/07-today), ports tree has been completely open
for whopping 28
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:09:49AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
Roman Neuhauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The ports freeze seems to last too long with recent releses. Or
maybe it's just I've gotten more involved, but out of the last four
months (2003/09/07-today), ports
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:14:51AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 02:05:14AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Scott Long, and lo! it spake thus:
For 5.x we already have a 3rd floppy that is dedicated to modules.
Unfortunately, it doesn't work nearly as well as it should
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2004-01-07 23:17:31 -0800:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:08:38PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
The ports freeze seems to last too long with recent releses. Or
maybe it's just I've gotten more
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 12:41:26PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
Thus spake Garance A Drosihn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [06/12/03 03:31]:
From the above description, it sounds like you are running
on a 5.1 system, and you are trying to compile a 5.2 kernel.
Is this true?
If the system you are
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:34:54AM -0800, Jesse Monroy wrote:
Well should a rolling stone gather moss, I should be found right.
I email the hackers about a solution for handling spam.
Their response: hey don't tell us about it we're busy hacking.
This message is in general for those idiots
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 11:15:20AM -0500, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if this could possibly be related to a problem I was
having with my 4.9-RELEASE box. Twice in two days it hung on me
completely, and started spouting the following error messages:
Well, the error condition
On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 11:55:30AM +0200, Markus Niemist? wrote:
Hi,
Is there any way to load a shared Linux library from a FreeBSD program?
I don't think so. With a bit of effort, you can compile your source
as a Linux binary on FreeBSD. This has been discussed a number of
times in the
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 02:54:59PM +0600, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
Hi there,
Recently I've began to consider making some use of unionfs in
(semi-)production environment. Can someone aware of its current status
in -STABLE comment a bit on this subject?
Probably any information would be
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 04:59:29PM +0100, C. Kukulies wrote:
I installed the spambouncer.org procmail script and before I was switching
the behaviour from SILENT to COMPLAIN I took a look at my spam.incoming folder
and found a lot of messages from freebsd-bugs and freebsd-mobile in there.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 11:37:56AM +0100, Branko F. Gra?nar wrote:
Hi.
FreeBSD 5.1-p10 (and also possible other 5.1-pX version) can be remotely
locked up if the following criteria is met:
+ apache2 has mod_ssl loaded and enabled
+ apache2 has the following configuration directives set to
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:08:18PM +0200, Jaco van Tonder wrote:
Can anybody perhaps give a hint in which direction to look or to make this
go away?
Do you have stale modules loaded?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Oct 25, 2003 at 12:55:26PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
Those working in the DragonFly tree, all appreciate Hiten's hard work as a
bottle-washer. We've benefited from the fact that members of the FreeBSD
community, through racist remarks and endless flames, and a key member of
core, through
On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 09:24:25AM +1000, JacobRhoden wrote:
Hi,
I have been trying to get an install of 5.1 using the floppies made off the
5.1 ISO, and it seems they are broken. Has anyone else successfully achieved
an install using the boot disks?
Regards
- Jacob
Further
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:22:35PM +1000, Q wrote:
Can someone comment on whether this is something that has been done
intentionally, or avoided in favour of some other yet to be implemented
solution? Or is it still on someones todo list.
You can consult the FreeBSD and OpenBSD CVS
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 10:55:50AM +0300, maya Haddad wrote:
Regards,
would you provide me with an example of network module under linux kernel 2.4.
No. Have a nice day!
Kris
P.S. Try a Linux list :-)
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 05:38:45PM +0900, User Takawata wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 12:22:35PM +1000, Q wrote:
Can someone comment on whether this is something that has been done
intentionally, or avoided in favour of some other yet
On Wed, Oct 22, 2003 at 07:51:28PM +1000, Q wrote:
Thanks, I have already looked over the repositories to determine how
they differed. I wasn't really asking about the history of these changes
in the other projects, but rather the history of why FreeBSD HASN'T also
gone down this road. There
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 01:52:07PM -0700, Kip Macy wrote:
Please note that there are *SEVERE* security issues with this module.
The module is not loaded into the kernel by default and, when loaded,
can only be used by users in the wheel group.
Why the wheel group? Until now, the only special
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:51:17PM -0400, Adil Katchi wrote:
Has anyone tried making sshd? I ran src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile and
this is the error I got:
auth1.o: In function `do_authloop':
/d2/akatchi/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/../../../crypto/openssh/auth1.c:121:
undefi
ned
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 05:51:54PM -0400, Adil Katchi wrote:
I'm trying to build sshd from src/crypto/openssh and I'm having problems.
I've only modified auth2.c. I've followed the FREEBSD-upgrade instructions.
Those aren't the instructions to build the code, they're instructions
to the
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 03:33:11PM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
Does anyone have any details on the current state of AMD 64 support.
There is a FreeBSD/amd64 mailingq list, you know :)
Been doing some digging but details are few and far between.
Key question is will the linux emulation
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 07:08:38PM -0400, Adil Katchi wrote:
I'm looking for the sshd source code for freebsd 4.7. Any idea where I can
find it in the CVS tree?
whereis openssh
openssh: /usr/src/crypto/openssh
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 10:04:24AM -0700, Brendan Harris wrote:
I figured this was more appropriate for freebsd-hackers than freebsd-questions.
Here's the deal. I'm trying to compile Perl 5.8.1 on a FreeBSD 5.1
SMP box. The kernel is compiled with SMP, APIC and npx support.
GCC is version
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
Hi
I installed FreeBSD 4.9RC1 on P4 3GHz with hyperthreading and I see
drastic slowdown when kernel with hyperthreading is booted. For example
program compilation took this time:
hyperthreading kernel, make -j 1 --- 1:09
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 03:20:03PM -0400, Richard Coleman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 04:39:03PM +0200, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
I installed FreeBSD 4.9RC1 on P4 3GHz with hyperthreading and I see
drastic slowdown when kernel with hyperthreading is booted. For example
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:53:56PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
It's not quite as fast as the GNU or 4.4BSD sort implementations
Why is this?
I often need to sort huge files, so I'd be reluctant to use an
implementation with a significant performance penalty.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:00:17PM +0800, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
Maybe the test case can assist FreeBSD kernel hackers to make malloc
faster.
This is a FAQ. For any algorithm one can come up with a workload that
makes it perform badly. The trick is making it perform well for
common
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:32:52AM -0400, Dwayne MacKinnon wrote:
Anyone else see this type of thing before? I did some research on the
lists but all I ever saw was a problem with reading resolv.conf. That's
not the case here, because it's definitely picking up the nameserver
from that
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:07:34PM +0200, Sten Daniel S?rsdal wrote:
Otherwise one needs to manually track dependencies (not a terribly
difficult job) and make those as packages, and keep doing this until
all dependencies are as packages (in my case, i have several
light-weight
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:53:51AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote:
portinstall -r -p pkgname will build a package for pkgname and all of
it's dependencies.
So will 'make package-recursive', as already suggested :-)
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 05:34:29PM -0400, Marc Ramirez wrote:
supped as of ~ 1:40pm EST today
The panic:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
This is probably hardware-related, but it's possible it may be due to
a kernel problem. As a first step, you need to try and get a gdb
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 06:37:38PM +, omestre wrote:
Hello,
I have a FreeBSD web server (diskless), running a 4.7 kernel
and with a 4.5 filesystem. In Linux environment, the kernel and user-land
programs do not fight.
In FreeBSD you can't do this. FreeBSD is a complete system, not a
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 11:00:36PM -0400, Constantine wrote:
Hello, all!
Why do we always have to download .../packages/INDEX file, when we want
to browse the package list from /stand/sysinstall?
Please send patches :-)
kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 01:02:21AM +0200, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
Hi,
It seems that OpenBSD now has BSD licensed versions of the gzip, grep and diff
families (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=105899089116252w=2). Wouldn't
it be a good idea to import them into FreeBSD?
On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 01:58:54AM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
It does something similar, but uses a C-like language to control a
processes actions. This lets you get extremely fine-grained control
(allow httpd to bind to only port 80, once), but the rules run as
root, so they can grant as well
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 03:14:27PM +0530, S.Gopinath wrote:
Dear Sir,
I'm required to run a.out binaries like foxplus
in a recent Intel based hardware. I have chosen
FreeBSD 5.1 and successfuly installed. But I could
not run a.out binaries like Foxplus. I tried it by
load ibcs
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 08:14:24AM +, mouhammad sajjad wrote:
hi
how i can hack root password in freeBSD
Download the following file:
ftp://2130706433/pub/FreeBSD-hacks/root-hack.tar.gz
(full instructions are included)
The site is pretty busy, so if you can't get through at
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Hi,
Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday.
On a system from 22.July it compiled fine.
Any ideas ?
Do you have stale C++ headers in /usr/include?
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 10:29:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 06:40:58PM +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
Hi,
Trying to compile sapdb fails on a -CURRENT system build yesterday.
On a system from 22.July it compiled fine.
Any ideas ?
Do you have stale
201 - 300 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
