just what and why this happens and post
: that.
: (reminder: even if this change happened in 3.4, it didn't affect me till
: 5.5)
It might be useful to find the change.
Warner
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
SECNAP Network Security / www.secnap.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 1+561-999-50
> -Original Message-
> From: M. Warner Losh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 9:39 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
> libc_r depends on absolute system time to do its s
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Originator:Michael Scheidel
>Organization: SECNAP Network Security
>Confidential:
>Synopsis: FBSD 5.5 broke nanosleep in libc_r
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Category: threads
>Class: sw-bug
>Release: FreeBSD 5.5-RELEA
-lc_r
setting clock back 'hangs' during usleep (500*1000)
didn't hang on 5.4.
I will be writing up a bug report shortly.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
SECNAP Network Security / www.secnap.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / 1+561-999-5000, x 1131
___
freeb
Tim Kientzle wrote:
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > I presume the servers are all stable (ie not stepping) and : >
have a reasonably low delay. If so, I suspect your ntpd PLL :
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Watt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 6:28 PM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
> It sounds like ntpd isn't really synchronizing. If you keep
&g
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 4:00 AM
> To: Michael Scheidell
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: FBSD 5.5 and software timers
>
>
> Basically, when you ask for a 200msec delay,
Michael Scheidell wrote:
I had a 200ms software timer running in FBSD 5.4 that isn't working in
5.5 now.
This software timer was resetting a 1 second hardware watchdog timer.
Every 200ms, I sent a reset to the hardware WDT.
Everything worked on 5.4, but I am getting failures on 5.5
It ap
bout 2 seconds per hour!)
Also, 5.4 also showed alternating -2 and +2 second time resets, about
once an hour, but it didn't seem to affect nanosleep().
ntpd using strata 2 ntp server, with 2 other backups.
ntpdc -c peers shows drift when using -x option. (no different then 5.4 did)
--
Mi
>
> Would http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/pxe/ be any
> help? :)
>
Saw that once... with all the scripts, post install scripts, etc, it
sounded like it would take a lot longer than setting up my own 'release
branch', like installing fbsd via ftp o
tself and load its own
image.
This would be to a 'virgin' hd, with no slice or partitions yet.
What about a master boot cd rom?
What about setting up and alternate ftp source and 'release' image? one that
we managed and controlled?
--
Michael Scheidell
SECNAP Network Security,
; --Peter
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
>
--
Michael Scheidell
SECNAP Network Security, LLC
(561) 368-9561 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.secnap.net/
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
found ground through T1!
(then again, check your cron also . turn on dumpdev.
--
Michael Scheidell
SECNAP Network Security, LLC
(561) 368-9561 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.secnap.net/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
in 'SMB use SID to enemurate'
but i verified these are not still runnning.
only one that works is this code:
/*
* Invalid argument
*/
if(!pid)
return 0;
*/
for(i=0,ret=1;(i<100) && (ret > 0);i++)
ret = waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG);
return kill(pid, 0) == 0;
ith "." on a line by itself
>>> .
250 2.0.0 g03IeuW37448 Message accepted for delivery
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent (g03IeuW37448 Message accepted for delivery)
Closing connection to ns.fdma.com.
>>> QUIT
221 2.0.0 mail.fdma.com closing connection
Mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail sent!
essus 1.09
(scan of 1200 on nessus 1.09 took 28 hours before, now takes about 4 house
with max_hosts = 30, max_threads = 20 on a 850mhz PII with 256MB ram.
--
Michael Scheidell
Secnap Network Security, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1+(561) 368-9561
See updated IT Security News at http://www.fdma.com/
id because
@@ -917,6 +920,7 @@
else return 0;
}
+#endif
/*
* Second method, we attempt to use kill. But first, we
* wait() for the process, just in case it's a zombie.
--
Michael Scheidell
Secnap Network Security, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1+(561) 368-9561
See updated IT Security
n the FBSD
distributer libpcap, hanging on pcap_next().
I got those also in nessus 1.09
this was fixed in nessusd 1.1x, which uses its one libpcap.
I would be interested in seeing if nessus 1.10 or 1.11x panics freebsd at
your site.
--
Michael Scheidell
Secnap Network Security, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED
--- 1 root wheel2, 1 Dec 28 15:37 /dev/kmem
--
Michael Scheidell
Secnap Network Security, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1+(561) 368-9561
See updated IT Security News at http://www.fdma.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the b
- Original Message -
From: "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
> *mp, *sp, *p, *(
- Original Message -
From: "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "David Malone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2
- Original Message -
From: "Alfred Perlstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "David Malone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2
4.4-STABLE (RELENG_4)
same thing, make clean, make workd, also:
ssh now give me this when I connect:
Using username "scheidell".
otp-md5
S/Key Password:
--
Michael Scheidell
Secnap Network Security, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1+(561) 368-9561
See updated IT Security News at http://www.fdma.com/
- Original Message -
From: "David Malone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Scheidell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:18 PM
Subject: Re: userland program panics freebsd 4.3
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 09:10:14AM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > > I doubt hardware related
> > > I can get it to do it on two seperate boxes.
> >
> > OK, then you need to get more details as explained.
>
> My gut r
1, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:45:51PM -0500, Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm not aware of any services that broke between 4.3 and 4.4. Care
to
> > > > elaborate?
> > >
> > > scan through f
this seems to be in the kernel anyway, so why would moving from a known
to an unknown be a good thing?
I did what everyone said, enable dumpdev and send in results.
Its not hardware (too consistant, same spot, two different pieces of hardware)
its a userland program and should not panic
in the same vm section my system is crashing
in.
From: "Nick Hilliard"
Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: hitting kern.maxfiles causes panic 12 reboot?
> Michael Scheidell wrote:
> > I know (overall) what the program
I doubt hardware related
I can get it to do it on two seperate boxes.
Updating to freebsd 4.4 is a bad option, with all the reported ports and
services broken.
--
Michael Scheidell
Secnap Network Security, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1+(561) 368-9561
See updated IT Security News at http://www.fdma.com
¨\n(Ò¨\n(°ë\020(ò¨",
f_spares2 = 10250, f_spare = {671787266, 671787282}}
print sp->f_flags
Cannot access memory at address 0x39.
print mp
$6 = (struct mount *) 0x2811aea8
(kgdb) print p
$7 = (struct proc *) 0x8068ee4
(kgdb) print mp
(kgdb) print sp
$9 = (struct statfs *) 0x9
--
Michael S
30 matches
Mail list logo
