#x27;t see
what's inelegant about that.
This is C, use pointers, if you want high level string parsers, use
Perl.
Cheers,
Rob.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Bakul Shah wrote:
+--
| [cc'ed Rob in case he wishes to chime in]
+-
No, I think you covered most of it quite well [including the bit
about "grep -m" not working properly in the case of pipes, sockets,
special files, etc.], thanks.
Yes, I know that "grep(1)
alf a
dozen apologies to make. I promise I will never mention Sysinstall again!
I continue to use FreeBSD as I have for the last 10 years and I guess my
biggest contribution has been making it known to people and evangelizing it,
as it really does blow away Linux in performance.
Sincerely,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:58 PM, Rob Lytle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Greg Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 2008-07-03, Rob Lytle wrote:
>>
>> > > You can get rid of the nag screens by putting &quo
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:06 PM, Greg Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 2008-07-03, Rob Lytle wrote:
>
> > > You can get rid of the nag screens by putting "BATCH=yes" into
> > > /etc/make.conf. (Not that this negates your other points.)
> >
>
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:33 PM, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob Lytle wrote:
>
>> Hi Kevin,
>>
>> The sysinstall dependency problem has existed for 10 years, so I doubt
>> that
>> its unique to me. It has occurred in every
iling. Plus, you are presented with numerous nag screens
so you have to babysit the whole process.
Rob.
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Kevin Oberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 21:28:50 -0700
> > From: "Rob Lytle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
a long compile time. For this request I will just have to wait for
FreeBSD 10.0.
Sincerely, Rob
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:16:27 -0700
> Curtis Penner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > BSD has a
ut and
randomly connects to any open access point- not my WAP encrypted one here.
Even Vista can be set not to do that!
Sincerely, Rob
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Antoine BRUNEL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I complete what Curtis wrote...
>
> How many times do you have to in
rld gets installed, I will try portupgrade again.
Sincerely, Rob
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Sean Cavanaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:23:48 -0700
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
old. But someone who
knows the system could probably fix it fast. I think this is such an
inherent infrastructure problem that has existed so long that a bug report
would be futile.
Food for thought. Thanks,
Rob
--
--
http://www.youtube.
Someone I can't stand said this about FreeBSD. Though I know C, I don't
know anything about this and would love to respond. My first thought was
'contigmalloc' but I'm not sure it's equivalent.
[QUOTE]The kernel is really lacking some features. They need a method to
set precise type of memory c
Let's hear from Apple themselves at
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Darwin/Conceptual/KernelProgramming/BSD/chapter_11_section_3.html
"the BSD portion of Mac OS X is primarily derived from FreeBSD"
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Rob Watt wrote:
> The test machine did panic. Unfortunately I was not running with
> BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER. I will re-run the tests with all of the debugging
> options we were using before, and then send you the trace info.
Unfortunately I was not able to reproduce t
t; it to RELENG_5, just to make sure that I don't destabilize -STABLE. I
> do want to get the fix into RELENG_5, since this thread originated with
> a complaint about 5.4-STABLE.
I should be able to have a 5.4 machine available to test this tonight.
On Mon, 10 Oct 2005, Rob Watt wrote:
> Don,
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Don Lewis wrote:
>
> > Both HEAD and RELENG_6 have been patched. I've tested the following
> > patch for RELENG_5 on a uniprocessor sparc64 box. I'd appreciate it if
> > anyone who was ru
it before I do the MFC.
We have a machine running with those patches applied. We need to do some
other tests on it today, but tonight we will run our threaded applications
that trigger the kern_proc problem in top. We should have results tomorrow
morning.
-
Rob Watt
_
of -2:-2. All other users will be
mapped to their remote credential.
If you want a remote system to have root access to the file system you *MUST*
explicity configure this.
--
Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards!
___
freebsd-
should, and you can find out (again, from
the man page):
-l Turn on libwrap connection logging.
--
Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
EDefang, but there are a large number of others.
--
Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
simulations (and top) for 3
days straight without crashing. Since we were panicking every 3-6 hours
before when running top, this seems to have fixed the problem.
We noticed the patches from Don Lewis, but have not tested them yet. We
weren't sure if we could just apply those patches agains
tc somewhere, but uncompressed that is
about 5G of data. What is the best way to get that to you?
Thanks.
-
Rob Watt
6.0-BETA5.kgdb.out
Description: Binary data
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ing for 50 hours without crashing.
This means that we are now only hitting these bugs with dual dual-core
machines running 5-STABLE.
-
Rob WattDDB:
>sh lockedvnods
Locked vnodes
>sh alllocks
Process 2204 (dataplay) thread 0xff00b1726a000 (100214)
exclusive sleep mutex inp (udpinp) f = 0
s that kg is an invalid pointer.
We have started our tests again without running top.
Hope you have a great vacation.
-
Rob Watt
type3-core.txt
Description: Binary data
Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
T
the newer hardware we've been buying. We really need to find a way to
patch these problems or find a version of freebsd that supports our
platform and is stable. Obviously we appreciate the hard work that all of
you on the freebsd team do, and we are happy to do whatever we can to help
squash
On 9/27/05, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Rob Watt wrote:
>
>
> Is this an SMP box? If so, could you try compiling options KDB_STOP_NMI
> into your kernel -- you'll also need to set debug.kdb.stop_cpus_with_nmi=1
> in eithe
tap". They're designed to do
exactly what you're looking for - allow sniffing of traffic from a link.
Most taps require you to sniff the traffic on 2 ports, one for each direction.
However NetOptics (and probably others) do a range of taps that aggregate the
traffic onto a single
ware
specs, the network speed and the sizes of the emails. Try both and see what's
faster, on average, for you.
--
Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
?
Yes. Off the top of my head I don't remember it, but it's fairly easy to find
the menu option.
--
Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
On Monday, May 30, 2005 7:58 PM, Peter Jeremy
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> unleashed the infinite monkeys and
produced:
> On Mon, 2005-May-30 10:30:30 +0100, Rob MacGregor wrote:
>> Looking at VMWare's list of supported client OSs, FreeBSD 5 is only
>> supported in the
BSD 5 is only supported in
the recently released VMWare 5.
--
Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards!
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
of endorsement).
If my understanding is incorrect, please let me know. In any case,
thanks for the help (and thanks to those that have replied off list).
- Rob
.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
ariable to
confirm it. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks,
- Rob
.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right, it does. However, myself and collegue recently presented
our work in raw Atheros raw frame injection at ToorCon based on the
Atheros HAL and Sam's driver/HAL wrapper. If you're familliar with these
cards and their current status
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 10:35:29AM -0500, Rob Deker wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering if anybody was working on porting the new
open-source Atheros HAL from OpenBSD to FreeBSD yet.
Why would you want to do this? Doesn't it provide a subset of what
the FreeBSD d
Hi,
I was just wondering if anybody was working on porting the new
open-source Atheros HAL from OpenBSD to FreeBSD yet. If not I'm willing
to take a stab at it, but I don't want to duplicate efforts already
underway. If anybody is working on this already and could use any help,
etc. drop me a l
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 19:21, Sam Leffler wrote:
> > ~ - Is this a function of the HAL?
>
> hardware (but only 5210 parts need it).
>
> > ~ - If so, does the header length parameter to ath_hal_setuptxdesc()
> > tell the HAL how many bytes it needs to send at a slower rate?
> > ~ - If the answers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey folks,
~I've recently been working on some patches to the ath(4) driver to
allow for raw frame injection, and I've got a question. Our patches
will be allowing for full-frame raw injection, and so we can't
necessarily know the length of the head
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
| If you are able to be at a command line, you could try: sysctl
| debug.kdb.current=ddb
|
If I was able to get to a command line, I'd just use shutdown :) Could
I build up the appropriate struct in gdb and use the sysctl() syste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So, after a lot of work and help from folks here, I've gotten remote
gdb functioning (thanks again to those who helped. In the end there
was a bad cable in the mix that was the final screw-up). Now I have
one other question/problem. I've got cuaa0 on th
On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 18:55, Stephan Uphoff wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Try the patch from kern/65278
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/65278
>
Thanks,
Looks like that did some good (I have my console back now), but when i
either "boot -g" or break into ddb and give it a "gdb" command,
Hi folks,
New to the list, so please bear with me if this is a question that's
been answered someplace before. I've been searching and can't seem to
find an answer.
I'm doing some driver hacking w/ FreeBSD 5.2.1 and I've hit a spot where
my life would be much easier if I had remote GDB for kerne
" slot.
3) Replace them with quieter drives. The newer Seagate drives are
pretty good.
--
Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards!
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Only one post is required...
Take a look at NUT (Network UPS Tools), which is in the ports. It
should do everything you want. You can find the web page at
http://www.networkupstools.org.
--
Rob | Oh my God! They killed init! You bastards!
> -Original Message-
> From:
'm afraid, so if you want me to see something
you'll need to CC me.
TIA
--
Rob | What part of "no" was it you didn't understand?
_
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends
http://www.msn.c
for all chips involved, kernel configuration info, run
tests, etc. if it will help. I's also be willing to compensate
someone some for their efforts should we manage to find an
answer.
Thanks, in advance,
Rob McKeever
Vancouver, BC Canada
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
* Naga Narayanaswamy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020523 19:21]:
> When you say src address is set to host group, what application generates
> them? What is the src and dest address ? I quickly checked Rich Stevens vol
> II.
> Looks like the code has been like this since old days.
> Is the application se
* Rob ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020522 20:30]:
> I was just wondering why the src address is set to the host group in
> outgoing multicast packets on RELENG_4? As far as I can tell, rfc1054
> says that the src address should be set to that of the host, not the
> host group (6.2). The beh
so. This leads me to believe that this producer/consumer
programming model show above is incorrect. Should we be doing this
differently?
Many thanks,
Rob A
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
went from there and those early days I
was able to talk to local hosts from the local machine. This was back in
June when I first got my cable modem
--
Rob Zietlow
Network Security Engineer
SecurePipe
Madison, WI (608)-294-6940
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ed into my
rc.conf "ipfilter_rules="etc/ipf.rules" " as the rc.conf in
/etc/defaults/rc.conf had listed in it.
Rob
Previously smacked into the keyboard
> Rob Zietlow wrote:
> >
>
> {snip}
>
> > would be able to do everything. I modified the GE
hat's been
documented but for whatever reason Google didn't bring it up? Just
thought I would make others aware of it as well so they don't run into the
same issue that I had.
Please CC me as i am not currently a memeber of the mailing list and have
interest about the outcome o
I am writing this mailing list in a desperate attempt to find out how to
restore my hdd with out loosing all the data on it. Recently I added two
additional hard drives to my freebsd 4.2 system. Once I booted up my system
and dl'ed some things with wget a bunch of errors occurred resulting in
"k
SD installs?
>
> --
> \ |_ _|__ __|_ \ __| Jason Andresen[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |\/ | ||/ _| Network and Distributed Systems Engineer
> _| _|___| _| _|_\___| Office: 703-883-7755
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with &q
On a related topic, I wonder whether gcc 3.0 will improve Athon
compilations. I have a big number crunching program that runs just as
fast on Windows2000 on my laptop(1Ghz PPro), as on my monster 1.2G
Athlon DDR with FreeBSD. Rob.
"Søren Schmidt" wrote:
>
> It seems Dav
Rob wrote:
>
> I am trying to run diff on two huge files (220M) and I run out of swap
> space. Is there another alternative? I have a Python script that does
> something similar, but works on huge files, but it is much slower than
> diff. Thanks, Rob.
>
> To Unsubscribe
Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Rob wrote:
>
> > Rob wrote:
> > >
> > > I am trying to run diff on two huge files (220M) and I run out of swap
> > > space. Is there another alternative? I have a Python script that does
> > >
I am trying to run diff on two huge files (220M) and I run out of swap
space. Is there another alternative? I have a Python script that does
something similar, but works on huge files, but it is much slower than
diff. Thanks, Rob.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
am and compiled it with gcc, and all it appears to do
is the same as regular assignment. But I'm wondering if in some day
long ago, it mean't something else? Thanks, Rob.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
user specify an
alternate strip program with the STRIP environment variable. This
functionality is based on NetBSD's xinstall -S flag. Unfortunately, -S
is already used by FreeBSD's xinstall as a "safe copy".
Rob
Index: install.1
===
some reason IP NAT is not turning on the
broadcast flag for the socket, but I'm not sure.
Little help? Muchas Gracias.
--Rob
________
Rob Harris 8037 Laurel Lakes Court, Laurel MD 301.598.0500 x2236
Cidera, I
defined reference to `xpt_done'
dpt_scsi.o: In function `dpttimeout':
dpt_scsi.o(.text+0x1d2a): undefined reference to `xpt_print_path'
dpt_scsi.o(.text+0x1d54): undefined reference to `xpt_print_path'
*** Error code 1
- --
Any help or suggestions would be appre
t I type. I also get a "pam: no
modules loaded for xdm service" or kdm service, depending. I have a line in my
/etc/pam.conf:
xdm authrequiredpam_unix.so try_first_pass
Unfortunantly, no matter what happens, neither KDM nor XDM will recognize me.
Any ideas, an
e are none for
4.0 - in which the kernel config pnp syntax has totally changed. Even if
it hadn't, my kernel still doesn't recognize it...if there's anyone out
there that has any information, please, let me know.
Thanks,
Rob
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ota.pernet.net/
To Unsub
se remember, I have no experience
with pthreads, and any advice you give would be greatly appreciated.
I tried doing a pool of threads created at startup, and I think that may
be a better approach...That would allow tighter control of resource limits
- do something like Apache, have a "maximum number&
t thread simply
grabs the descriptor (since it's shared) from the previous thread and
starts doing all its writing to that socket. Any idea how to get around
this? If there's any good example code, please let me know.
Thanks,
Rob
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ota.pernet.net/
To
t thread simply
grabs the descriptor (since it's shared) from the previous thread and
starts doing all its writing to that socket. Any idea how to get around
this? If there's any good example code, please let me know.
Thanks,
Rob
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ota.pernet.net/
To Unsubsc
Emm, I guess that answers my earlier question/mail:
Why?--->
basil# uname -a
FreeBSD basil.dympna.com 3.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE #7: Thu Aug 19
23:59:50 CDT 1999
rs...@basil.dympna.com:/export/current/src/sys/compile/Basil-SMP
[Dual PPro-233's]
basil# cd /stripe
basil# df -k .
Filesystem
Emm, I guess that answers my earlier question/mail:
Why?--->
basil# uname -a
FreeBSD basil.dympna.com 3.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE #7: Thu Aug 19
23:59:50 CDT 1999
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/export/current/src/sys/compile/Basil-SMP
[Dual PPro-233's]
basil# cd /stripe
basil# df -k .
Filesystem
ed to worry
> about this at all with 3.2-BETA/3.2-RELEASE.
>
I thought so as well, however I added a 64 meg dimm and ran into the same
problems he is describing. After I remembered the problem. I lowered the
value of maxusers and everything is back to normal. This is on 4.0 -
Current. btw..
striped 9.1G 'cudas, SMP.
-Rob
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> well, I am working on writing a capture program to do 640x480x12bpp@30fps
> to a raw disk, but writing to the raw device is SOOO slow... the reason
> I say it's slow is the fact that it takes 8 times the syst
+0 records out
134217728 bytes transferred in 7.938773 secs (16906609 bytes/sec)
0.007u 0.520s 0:07.98 6.5% 73+371k 2+0io 0pf+0w
-Rob
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> well, I am working on writing a capture program to do 640x480x12bpp@30fps
> to a raw disk, but writing to the raw
72 matches
Mail list logo
