ctually, before the
64-bit userland existed) and it worked just fine.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 09/04/13 11:00, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 10:11:28 am Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do
the
porting work
On 09/04/13 08:20, Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do the
porting work?
-Nathan
#define GET_STACK_USAGE(total, used)
GET_STACK_USAGE sets the variable passed in total to the total
there and I wanted
to stay on a safe side. On other archs GEOM works in old queued way.
Somebody should port that small macro to other archs. But that is
still interesting data point. Thanks.
Could you describe what this macro is supposed to do so that we can do
the porting work
On 05/27/13 23:36, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 6:53 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 05/27/13 20:40, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 2:23 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 27/05/2013 21:28, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 5/27/13 11:40 AM, Bruce Cran wrote:
Yes.
Is this a joke?
It probably
ed up having
time to finish. Probably a reasonable thing to do is to start with
supporting only a minimal set of features. If anyone felt like actually
writing this code, I'm sure it would be appreciated by all and be more
productive than email exchanges.
-Nathan
__
get pc-sysinstall running on all of them first in case there's
some problem that means it can't be done, in which case we'd need to
use a different backend.
I'd point out that bsdinstall does have a scripting interface
all-sh(1) future -- by far the
cleanest parts of bsdinstall are in C -- and this is especially true for
interacting with geom. That said, since I've lost nearly all of my free
time and ability to work on bsdinstall, I won't get in the way of
rity problem is also an action totally
disproportionate with the issue that should not be made in a panic.
Having more [cryptographic] verifiability in the release process is a
good thing; it is not strictly related to the choice of version control
s
y follow Tijl's model since we are on that path.
I originally preferred the /usr/include/i386 approach, but have come around
to Tjil's approach instead.
I just wanted to add that the unified 32/64 header route is where we
went on PowerPC (and MIPS?) a
der unification, which seems to be in progress. Moreover, if you are
building standalone binaries (which the EFI stuff probably is) it should
just work now, since standalone code doesn't depend on system headers.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.o
Thanks for the information -- I got scared by "SysV init". This actually
does look very nice.
-Nathan
On 06/13/12 13:35, Richard Yao wrote:
The OpenRC is sysvinit compatible, but it has few of sysvinit's flaws.
It has named runlevels, the presence of an init script does not ca
Can you point me at the exact code in arm pmap ?
I remember an issue on PPC which Nathan discussed, that sounds somewhat
similar (but I still do not understand what exactly happens on ARM). On
PowerPC, icache needs to be explicitely flushed if write happen to the
executable mapping. See r233949 fo
nf that was easy to configure
instead of the nightmare that is System V init.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
2 with
cpuset -l 2 or switch an existing process cpuset -l 2 -p 1200.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-uns
w.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=release&apropos=0&sektion=7&manpath=FreeBSD+8.2-stable&arch=default&format=html
This situation should be corrected for 9.1.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
is SHA256 and base.txz does contain the manpages. The script that
generates MANIFEST is at /usr/src/releases/scripts/make-manifest.sh if
you want to see what the rest of the fields are.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
frame-frame-pointer on PPC then? It's
enabled in default kernel builds.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
you explain why the critical section is there in more detail? It
seems like all of our problems arise because of it.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
tells you* you need to create sub-partitions.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 08/31/11 08:28, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 31 August 2011 14:45, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
It does let you set mountpoints, and displays them, and always has, but not
for bsdlabel container partitions (MBR type "freebsd"), since they aren't
filesystems. Is this what you were tryin
On 08/31/11 05:19, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 31/08/2011 02:40, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/30/11 19:07, Ivan Voras wrote:
It was a plain install on a RAID volume which appears as ordinary da0
drive. I did do a couple of start-overs so it could be that some state
got lost. It definitely did NOT
On 08/30/11 19:07, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 30.8.2011. 16:11, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 08/30/11 07:27, Ivan Voras wrote:
Am I doing something wrong or the BETA1 installer cannot be used to
manually create the partition scheme?
1) it doesn't accept "freebsd-swap" as partition
were using, etc.? The "invalid argument" is a
message coming from the kernel, so something must be very wrong in your
setup.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
ail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On -CURRENT, it places them in /usr/obj/usr/src/release. You can use
make install DESTDIR=blah to put them somewhere else. On 8.x and earlier
it places them in CHROOT/R.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-ha
On 07/12/11 17:33, Robert Millan wrote:
2011/7/12 Nathan Whitehorn:
On 07/12/11 16:06, Robert Millan wrote:
Why would one need to build a cross-compiler in order to compile
userland-agnostic code for the same CPU architecture? This would be
like requiring a cross-compiler in order to build
-compiler in order to build things like GRUB or
SeaBIOS.
For one, it might have a different ABI, which isn't actually that
different an issue than the one you find yourself facing.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
they are still the
same size as a void *.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ARM, PPC, PPC64, and ia64, which I just tested. I
think you're safe.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
was replaced it were that it (a) has a
better libdialog API, (b) has a better license (LGPL instead of GPL),
(c) is maintained, and (d) supports 8-bit character sets. If there is
some specific feature you are interested in (--hline for instance), I'd
suggest writing to Thomas Dickey, the m
way to completely reset
those with the current options.
Since you need to build two compilers anyway (one for the current
system, to build the new one, and one to live in the new one, linked
against new libraries), I don't see that it's such a nasty hack.
-Nathan
___
tive MBR" trick?
No, they can only boot from APM (Apple Partition Map) disks, which don't
have a concept of active partition. The current boot1 on PPC is
hard-coded to boot from the first UFS partition on the disk, which could
be changed, certainly, but is almost totally unrelated to
AGP is derived from PCI, so AGP devices show up on the PCI bus. All the
AGP kernel module does is provide hooks to manipulate some advanced
features of the bus, mostly for the benefit of drm.
-Nathan
On 01/12/11 19:24, Super Bisquit wrote:
My graphics port is agp and not pci. It
powerpc. The AGP kernel module also doesn't provide
any useful features unless you are using DRM. You don't need either for
graphics on powerpc machines.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listin
l would be best
scenario, so any suggestions leaning towards having the sending program be
integrated within the kernel in some way would be even better.
I'm not looking for a handout here, just a better understanding of where to
start; so any suggestions or referrals to RTFM or source example
nstruct a web app inside a bundled web server to write a config file to
be interpreted by shell scripts just in order to run gpart, newfs, and
tar. But if you get it working, it's better than sysinstall no matter
how baroque.
-Nathan
___
freebs
and ia64 (i.e. Intel products).
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
has been issued.
>
> It's been a while, but the problem I found when comparing the NetBSD
> code was that there didn't appear to be a way to tell from within the
> FreeBSD driver whether it was a shutdown or reboot.
Register a shutdown event handler? The second argument
On 09/06/10 22:24, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 09/06/10 20:22, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
>> Now that my SLB allocation issue is solved, with help with Matthew and
>> Alan, I have another VM puzzler.
>>
>> I have a simple program that tries to use all the memory
On 09/06/10 20:22, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> Now that my SLB allocation issue is solved, with help with Matthew and
> Alan, I have another VM puzzler.
>
> I have a simple program that tries to use all the memory on the system,
> which isn't very much on the PS3, so I use it
10^15
pages to unmap in that range and it was busy taking until the end of
time unmapping them all.
Here's the trace from KDB:
moea64_remove()
pmap_remove()
vm_daemon()
fork_exit()
fork_trampoline()
end-
Does anyone have any idea why this is happening?
Thank
On 09/05/10 22:51, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Nathan Whitehorn
> wrote:
>
>> PowerPC hypervisors typically provided a restricted range on memory when
>> the MMU is disabled, as it is when initially handling exceptions. In
>> order to
on ("page is not free"). What is the
correct way to deallocate these pages? Or is there a different approach
I should adopt?
-Nathan
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsu
John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday 24 March 2010 3:29:23 pm Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
We currently detect the offical "text" and "data" addresses for ELF
files in kern/imgact_elf.c by the heuristic of calling whichever section
contains the executable's entry p
SD. I also take the opportunity to convert
several of the declarations of exec_setregs() from K&R to ANSI C.
This patch is fairly straightforward, but it does touch all
architectures. I have tested the patch on amd64, sparc64, and powerpc,
with no evident problems.
any comments, as well as tests on other
architectures. The main symptom of getting these values wrong is that
sbrk() stops working correctly, so I have put a simple test program for
sbrk() at http://people.freebsd.org/~nwhitehorn/sbrktest.c.
-Nathan
__
ng the good or the bad points of doing this - and
it seems to me not something worth arguing the merits of. If you believe
in it enough, then do it or at least try it. Lets move on from if we
should or shouldn't, and look more to HOW we
Any suggestions/guidance would be greatly appreciated at this point...
kinda running out of things to try and can't really audit the entire source code
for something I know little about the internals of.
Thanx all
--
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd.
ht
I'm working in FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE.
In various places in the buffer management code (e.g. ibwrite()) the
buffer lock reference count is checked (see below), presumably to make
sure the buffer is safely locked before working with it. Is there a
reason that it's not neccesary to ensure that the cur
x binaries,
without needing to run brandelf on them. I've been considering working
on a patch for that, but haven't had time.
---Nathan
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
eeBSD with no problems. (Local computer store
has had used ones very cheap.)
I've used the Compaq DL380 with Linux, and would recommend it as quite
good and reliable hardware. Looks like the Compaq RAID controller is
supported on FreeBSD, but I don't have access to one anymore, so can&#x
>
> I'm crossposting to [EMAIL PROTECTED], as per suggestion.
>
> My original post, edited:
>
> > > ... why any kernels compiled with SMP enabled seem
> > > to be slowing the whole system down? Throughput goes down by 40%.
> Tasks
> > > take twice as long to run, etc, etc...
> > > ... it appea
xeon boxes, though they've stopped supporting the legacy mainframes.
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://Nathan.Vidican.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Wilko Bulte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Josh M Osborne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL P
h
the new Athlon MP Processors; or has no-one even tried yet? Currently
the only O/S I know of which is promoting the usage of such systems is
Novell Netware, and I am just curious if FreeBSD will (if it is not
currently) be capable of running on such a system?
--
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
ing machines
> rather difficult. I sure hope nobody is advocating doing away with
> the monolithic capabilities of /etc/rc.conf!
NetBSD has /etc/rc.conf and /etc/defaults/rc.conf too.
--
Nathan Ahlstrom / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / GPG: 0x67BC9D19
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
I am trying to document how the partitions are laid out in FreeBSD and I
have noticed that the installation will place the sector offsets of the
b (swap) partition before the last partition. And will also place the
sector offsets of the largest partition as the last regardless to its
name (ie: d o
ng and must be restarted
cylically?
Any ideas, comments, suggestions, or otherwise would be highly
appreciated at this point.
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd.
http://home.wmptl.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
the rest and boot it using Lilo (don't know if it's
going to work...but it's worth a try).
--
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd.
http://www.wmptl.com/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
driver level or at the hardware level ? (if anyone knows
)
and if FreeBSD does not support them then can anyone recommend something
similar ?
thank you
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ormation is as follows:
Running: FreeBSD 4.1-2729-STABLE
(no, I don't want to cvsup/update the machine...it works fine now, and
that would cause downtime)
Sendmail version: ESMTP Sendmail 8.9.3/8.9.3; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 13:38:08
-0500 (EST)
--
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsor
st 512 blocks of the harddrive and ran
> > strings on it. Seems that thier was nothing their ! so I was lucky
> > enough to have another 4.2 box and I just copied its first 512 blocks.
> > Now it boots fine !
> >
> > Is their a known issue with this ? or maybe I did s
!
Is their a known issue with this ? or maybe I did something wrong ?
thank you
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
at http://www.sporner.com/bsdclusters
>
> Your webpages seem to be b0rked.
>
> David
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I have been doing something very simular at work. I was wondering i
Now what do I have to do ? I have played with permissions (cu is setuid,
setgid) I have also tried to use stty and comcontrol but they say the
same.
Any help would be great !!
thank you
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in
ill be greatly appreciated !!!
thank you
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
doubt that it will come back fixed.
Any ideas, comments, suggestions, or otherwise would be greatly
appreciated at this point. I don't think it'd be something with FreeBSD,
but just in case, should I try to install a different version maybe?
(was trying to install FreeBSD 4.1-STA
e, but somehow I doubt that it will come back fixed.
Any ideas, comments, suggestions, or otherwise would be greatly
appreciated at this point. I don't think it'd be something with FreeBSD,
but just in case, should I try to install a different version maybe?
(was trying to install FreeBSD
don't know how it would be in
terms of performance, but you might be able to put a few of these
devices on to a system, and use vinum/raid of the raid systems, (seeing
as how FreeBSD would just see them as giant scsi drives).
I believe they do a setup which houses 8 ATA disks, in whi
sage
> >
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
How did you implement SMBFS? Is it yet a part of FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE or?
New kernel option?
--
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsor Match Plate
way I almost the same options . and maybe automate it...
Any help would be great !!
thank you kindly
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
SD !! ). Either default (use local drive) or load the diskless
> kernel , then boot diskless.
> This way I almost the same options . and maybe automate it...
>
> Any help would be great !!
>
> thank you kindly
>
> nathan
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
FreeBSD !! ). Either default (use local drive) or load the diskless
kernel , then boot diskless.
This way I almost the same options . and maybe automate it...
Any help would be great !!
thank you kindly
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
???
thank you
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
t the 8port 3ware card; what version of FreeBSD can support it,
and how do I patch said driver into the kernel? Does this allow the
hardware mirroring as setup by the bios in the 3ware card, or does one
still need to use vinum?
--
Nathan Vidican
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windsor Match Plate &
;
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Thanks
but not to sound too pesky...
When you wrote
if (!mmap(base + offset, additional length,
PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED | MAP_FIXED, fd, offset)) {
This may sound silly but after this is done then the file will reflect the changes
?
and now the file will extend beyond the original size ?
why do you need to unmap it ? if the file was mmap 'ed with MAP_SHARED and not
MAP_FIXED wouldn't the changes be made to all objects ? then you only need to
msync back the diff if any ? (or at all)
See I want to get around using the fd at all. I just want to open the file then
close it and just reference it from mem only. With Linux I think that you can do
this by calling mremap Linux man : "mremap expands (or shrinks) an existing
memory mapping"
So it would be kinda like realloc but the changes would be seen by all
objects.. ? and then I can close the fd and only keep track of 1 object. If I
need to add to it ... mremap on it.
Or am I just way off in my understanding ? I know that I did misuse the mmap in
the top snipit but I was just playing.
Thank you
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
only append to the buffer "base" and not
have to re-open the file and write to it then msync it back to mem. I know
that some of this under FreeBSD "automatic" meaning that the changes made to
the file are seen by "base" even though I do not call msync. but in
order
Is their a better solution besides just writing to the file and then
calling msync ?
Is their new plans to make a mremap call for FreeBSD 4.x ?
Or am I just sh%t out of luck ?
thank you in advance ....
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
select a
device installation it does not list my ethernet ?
It was supported under 3.3 and 3.2 (with PAO) has thier been changes ?
or is thier something special i need to do ?
Please any help ?
Sorry for spelling
thank you
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Is the soundblaster support for FreeBSD good ? (both intel and alpha)
if so does is support any of the SB pci cards ?
Do the supported cards work on both platforms ?
if so which ones ?
Thier is no specific mention of sound card chip sets for freebsd on
their web site
thank you
nathan
To
add_rt, l);
syslog(LOG_ERR, "errno = %d ", errno);
}
else{
/* get a buffer for the data */
ERR("get_droute returned ok %d ");
}
return(GOOD);
}
Thank you
nathan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
I;d like to start contributing to the project, and I've heard unanimously a good place
to start is device drivers. However, I'd like to try something other than sound cards
(the only major recommendation I've heard so far)
Are there any NICs, or other driver areas where FreeBSD could use some
I've been interested in becomng a FreeBSD-Hacker for awhile now, and now
that I have a pretty good understanding of C, I've been reading
Tanenbaum's books on Computer Organization and Operating Systems.
However, I've run into a problem on the digital-logic level of things.
>From my understandin
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
>
> Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://softweyr.com/
--
Nathan Dorfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> T
uivalent - most
commerical system offer this- any thoughts?
Regards,
Nathan Gould
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
ce, BSDI version uses 14788K.
Not sure what the additional memory requirements of use BSDI emulation
are, but I can notice the speed difference between Linux and BSDI
versions due to less paging.
-
Nathan Kinsman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
patches for this on my web page.
http://www.freebsd.org/~nrahlstr/suser.patch
I had been working with Eivind on it, but I have not had time as of late.
The patch that is there should be close to commit ready modulo a decsion
to use suser vs. suser_xxx.
If anyone is interested in committing this patc
in committing this patch, I can work with
them/clean it up if necessary.
Thanks!
Nathan
--
Nathan AhlstromFreeBSD: http://www.FreeBSD.org/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID: 0x67BC9D19
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
t; contractor in question.. :)
Would it be possible to have this code put up for www/ftp or
something, so that anyone who is interested could have a look?
I, for one, would like to have a look at it.
Nathan, not ready to commit to working on something like this. :(
--
Nathan Ahlstrom
t; contractor in question.. :)
Would it be possible to have this code put up for www/ftp or
something, so that anyone who is interested could have a look?
I, for one, would like to have a look at it.
Nathan, not ready to commit to working on something like this. :(
--
Nathan Ahlstrom
m700.html
>
> please let me know what you guys think, I want this to be a good time for
> all...
>
> -Pat
>
>
> ___
>
> Pat Lynch ly...@rush.net
> Systems Administrator
90 matches
Mail list logo
