:> did not. In general, NFS fixes for the -stable branch have been kept
:> up to date with the work in -current, but -current ought to have much
:> better NFS performance then stable.
:
:Performance = transfer rates and latency? Or just generalized stability?
:I haven't had the tim
Matthew Dillon wrote to Ryan Thompson:
> :ps al on my system shows multiple nfsrcv hangs on processes such as df, ls
> :and umount. Without any other characteristic problems, the nfs server
> : [...]
>
> I assume the hangs are on the client? Not surprising if its a 3.2
> system. A who
:ps al on my system shows multiple nfsrcv hangs on processes such as df, ls
:and umount. Without any other characteristic problems, the nfs server
:machine's exports all seemed to be working correctly. However, *one* and
:only one of the mounts somehow went south. 'mount' on the client machine
ps al on my system shows multiple nfsrcv hangs on processes such as df, ls
and umount. Without any other characteristic problems, the nfs server
machine's exports all seemed to be working correctly. However, *one* and
only one of the mounts somehow went south. 'mount' on the client machine
sho
4 matches
Mail list logo
