Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-21 Thread Aleksander Rozman - Andy
At 21.2.2002, Leo Bicknell wrote: >In a message written on Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:19:01PM -0600, Mike Meyer >wrote: > > Not necessarily. The client is free, and in the ports tree. That > > includes the server with an evaluation license, which limits it to two > > clients and two users. Perforce

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-21 Thread Leo Bicknell
In a message written on Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 10:19:01PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > Not necessarily. The client is free, and in the ports tree. That > includes the server with an evaluation license, which limits it to two > clients and two users. Perforce offers Open Source software projects > fre

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Kip Macy
Bitkeeper is not closed source, and is freely available so long as you use open logging. I haven't used bitkeeper on projects with more than a couple people so I'm not in a position to comment on how well it scales. However, perforce is what is used at NetApp (several hundreds of developers with ~

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Mike Meyer
David Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > Does Perforce support replicate like FreeBSD's current CVSUP support? It's certainly possibly in theory, but I don't know that anyone has ever tried it in practice. > if not, how does it support large number of users or connections? In generaly, it works

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread David Xu
> Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > > "Danny J. Zerkel" wrote: > > > Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real > > > configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done > > > on FreeBSD in Perforce? > > Frankly, it's because CVS only perm

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Mike Meyer
Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types: > "Danny J. Zerkel" wrote: > > Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real > > configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done > > on FreeBSD in Perforce? > Frankly, it's because CVS only permits a single

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Terry Lambert
Julian Elischer wrote: > Having used several professional CM systems including Clearcase, > I've come to the conclusion that CVS is preferable to most of them > It gets out of your way and lets you work. > CLearcase makes you spend too much time wondering about > what machine is where and which ma

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Terry Lambert
"Danny J. Zerkel" wrote: > Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real > configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done > on FreeBSD in Perforce? Frankly, it's because CVS only permits a single line of concurrent developement, and it's a limit

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Danny J. Zerkel wrote: > Maybe cvs is an academic toy. Most real development requires a real > configuration management system. Why do you think there is work being done > on FreeBSD in Perforce? The sooner FreeBSD and Linux can escape the clutches > of cvs, the bette

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Danny J. Zerkel
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 15:48, Aleksander Rozman - Andy wrote: > At 18.2.2002, you wrote: > >On Sunday 17 February 2002 11:12, Robert Withrow wrote: > > > Hi: > > > > > > I was wondering if there was anyone working on getting ClearCase > > > working on FreeBSD? > > > > > > It seems that if w

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, Aleksander Rozman - Andy wrote: > > Note here. As I remember version 4.x works on linux (I am sure for RedHat, > but not others). So if it works for RH it should for other too As for > views, I think that only Snapshot worked. > Why don't you use CVSUp, or are you dep

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-20 Thread Aleksander Rozman - Andy
At 18.2.2002, you wrote: >On Sunday 17 February 2002 11:12, Robert Withrow wrote: > > Hi: > > > > I was wondering if there was anyone working on getting ClearCase working > > on FreeBSD? > > > > It seems that if we can get the Linux version of VmWare to run on FreeBSD > > it should be possible to

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-17 Thread Danny J. Zerkel
On Sunday 17 February 2002 11:12, Robert Withrow wrote: > Hi: > > I was wondering if there was anyone working on getting ClearCase working > on FreeBSD? > > It seems that if we can get the Linux version of VmWare to run on FreeBSD > it should be possible to get the Linux version of ClearCase to ru

Re: Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-17 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Robert Withrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020217 08:13] wrote: > Hi: > > I was wondering if there was anyone working on getting ClearCase working > on FreeBSD? > > It seems that if we can get the Linux version of VmWare to run on FreeBSD > it should be possible to get the Linux version of ClearCase

Clearcase and FreeBSD

2002-02-17 Thread Robert Withrow
Hi: I was wondering if there was anyone working on getting ClearCase working on FreeBSD? It seems that if we can get the Linux version of VmWare to run on FreeBSD it should be possible to get the Linux version of ClearCase to run on FreeBSD, but maybe I'm just dreamin'? ---