[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
heresy Provided the module in question is contemplated for delivery
as a port, rather than as part of the base -- so that having a build
dependency on a port is tolerable -- perhaps it would be more easily
built using devel/gmake? /heresy
You'd have to reproduce most
On 2 Dec 2008, at 13:33 , Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
heresy Provided the module in question is contemplated for delivery
as a port, rather than as part of the base -- so that having a build
dependency on a port is tolerable -- perhaps it would be more easily
built
On 1 Dec 2008, at 01:22 , Tim Kientzle wrote:
.MAKEFILEDEPS: elements.mk
.sinclude elements.mk
.include bsd.kmod.mk
---8---
When I run make depend, it only includes SRCSs from BSDmakefile,
not those from elements.mk.
I would try adding a beforedepend requirement:
beforedepend: elements.mk
On Monday 01 December 2008 12:08:13 Nikola Knežević wrote:
On 1 Dec 2008, at 01:22 , Tim Kientzle wrote:
.MAKEFILEDEPS: elements.mk
.sinclude elements.mk
.include bsd.kmod.mk
---8---
When I run make depend, it only includes SRCSs from BSDmakefile,
not those from elements.mk.
I
As you discovered, includes are done before targets. You would
need seperate invocations of make, to generate the file and get
it included.
heresy Provided the module in question is contemplated for delivery
as a port, rather than as part of the base -- so that having a build
dependency on a
On Saturday 29 November 2008 12:40:47 Nikola Knežević wrote:
On 25 Nov 2008, at 15:20 , Nikola Knežević wrote:
I tried to move from OBJS into SRCS (main BSDmakefile now has: SRCS+=
$(ELEMENT_SRCS)), by using something like:
# subdir0
ELEMENT_SRCS__x =\
subdir1/file0.cc \
On 30 Nov 2008, at 18:43 , Mel wrote:
since there were no replies, I went into the various .mk's, and I
found some inconsistencies when building modules. If you have a file
in a different directory, below the directory where you BSDmakefile
is, objects won't be linked nor cleaned properly.
The
Nikola Knežević wrote:
As I described in my initial mail, I have to use two makefiles. One is
the main Makefile, while the other has to be generated. In the
generated .mk, I add to the SRCS, and I create the .PATH target with
other (necessary) directories. Unfortunately, make depend doesn't
On 25 Nov 2008, at 15:20 , Nikola Knežević wrote:
I tried to move from OBJS into SRCS (main BSDmakefile now has: SRCS+=
$(ELEMENT_SRCS)), by using something like:
# subdir0
ELEMENT_SRCS__x =\
subdir1/file0.cc \
subdir1/file1.cc
...
But this fails during the linking phase, because the linker
Hi,
I'm playing with the Click Modular router on my FreeBSD box. Out of
curiosity, I decided to switch its GNU makefile to BSD style. I
managed to do it, but I would like to polish it a bit more (and learn
some things along).
Old GNUmakefile relies heavily on OBJS and *_OBJS, as it fills
10 matches
Mail list logo
