Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-11 Thread MurrayTaylor
As the WanIC-405 is being phased out (according to my supplier down under here in OZ), has any development / testing been done on the apparent replacement, the WanIC-521 (522, 524 ... ) range I am especially interested in its compatibility with its predecessor which I am using very successfully

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-17 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >Behalf Of Louis A. Mamakos >Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 4:31 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: void; Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Imagestream WanI

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-11 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of MurrayTaylor >Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2001 4:49 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards > > >As the WanIC-405 is being phased out (according to my supplier >down under here

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-12 Thread Bsdguru
In a message dated 10/12/01 1:08:44 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Consider that the Hitachi controller chip used on the WANic 405 is the > SAME chip that Cisco uses in it's 25xx series of routers, and the Cisco > 2501 is the most used router in the world and has the mos

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-12 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 6:25 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards > > >In a message dated 10/12/01 1:08:44 AM Eas

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Bsdguru
In a message dated 10/13/2001 1:24:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> You tell your supplier that since the 405 is being "phased out" that he > >> should sell you a bunch of them at closeout prices. > >> > > > >Perhaps the fact that the (incredibly slow) 2501 has b

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 11:57 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards > > >> >> You know I really think your

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-14 Thread Bsdguru
In a message dated 10/13/01 9:33:53 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Hmm. Well, as a person who ran gated at BEST, has hacked on gated on > same, had to deal with BSDI and FreeBSD route table bugs, tracked down > OSPF bugs for a friend running gated, and other

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-14 Thread Valentin Nechayev
(redirected to -chat. it's pity that there are no freebsd-flame@ redirected to /dev/null;)) Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 12:58:54, Bsdguru ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote about "Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards": > Thats pretty lame Matt. I hope you're joking. (Otherwi

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-17 Thread Louis A. Mamakos
> > We have been told by our rep at Time Warner Communications that those payments > are still continuing. TW (at least in PDX) does not have enough voice sales > to be able to get on that pig trough and is equally unhappy as we are that the > RBOC's are propping up what are in effect bankrupt

RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-17 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On >Behalf Of Louis A. Mamakos >Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 6:43 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: void; Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Imagestream WanI

Re: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-17 Thread Louis A. Mamakos
> I am perfectly aware of this. > > The RBOCs deserved to have those "fines" levied against them for a number > of years, to punish them for attempting to block the CLECs. However, it's > been long enough for this, and in fact the money from the RBOCs is no longer > being used to increase the C

Re: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-12 Thread Matt Dillon
The Cisco 2600 series is great for T1's. A 2620 with a T1 card (it can take up to two) and you are done. The 2501's are ancient, don't even bother any more. You can find 2620's on EBay in the $700-$1500 range, many of which appear (in my quick look) to include a T1 card. As

RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: Matt Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 10:40 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards > > >The Cisco 2600 series is g

Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Matt Dillon
:on the Internet has been routers costing in the $100,000 range. Now, maybe :BEST Internet is now wealthy enough that you can blow that kind of money on :Cisco gear without thinking about it, but a lot of smaller ISP's are not. : :If you look at what happened last weekend on Sunday, and the numbe

RE: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-13 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: Matt Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2001 6:33 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards > > >:on the Internet has

RE: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards

2001-10-16 Thread Ted Mittelstaedt
>-Original Message- >From: void [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 9:22 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards > > >On Sat, Oct 13, 20