On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 05:06:41PM +0200, Ville-Pertti Keinonen wrote:
> > are need to have steal nerves. I fill that, at the time when I was porting
> > vmware. I have too much hours of very interested work - load driver, launch
> > vmware and then looking into the DDB double fault screen. Reloa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vladimir N. Silyaev) writes:
> are need to have steal nerves. I fill that, at the time when I was porting
> vmware. I have too much hours of very interested work - load driver, launch
> vmware and then looking into the DDB double fault screen. Reload box,
> and then again.
I
As Vladimir N. Silyaev wrote ...
> On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 09:37:03PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > Anyway, I'm more concerned with the CDrom drive right now.
> >
> [skipped]
> > Tried that. No luck :-(
> Try to run vmware from xterm, did you see messages about
> 'ioctl xxx not implemented' ?
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 09:37:03PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> Hm, I think I also saw it fallover when I did this (sometimes, not always).
I really don't have suggestion, what vmware doing, when it save configuration
file.
> Anyway, I'm more concerned with the CDrom drive right now.
>
[skipped]
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:02:37PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > I don't know. At any case we are need provide the same API as linux
> > vmnet provide, so we are need to implement it in the kernel module.
> > But bochs use user level implementation.
> >
> > > It does have some limitations (c
As Vladimir N. Silyaev wrote ...
Hello Vladimir,
> On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:34:04PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > Same here. But that also happened with the pre-Dec 1, 1999 version.
> > Does not happen always, sometimes it works. I have not yet found
> > a pattern.
> Every time, when you save
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Vladimir N. Silyaev wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 12:16:00PM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> > The bochs port implements a pseudo-ne2000 using BPF under FreeBSD, is
> > this approach a possibility? The freebsd ether stuff from bochs has
> > Peter Grehan ([EMAIL PROT
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 12:16:00PM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> The bochs port implements a pseudo-ne2000 using BPF under FreeBSD, is
> this approach a possibility? The freebsd ether stuff from bochs has
> Peter Grehan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on the copyright so he'd be the
> one to contact
+[ Vladimir N. Silyaev ]-
|
| > Vladimir's web page they don't work:
| >
| > "
| >- All networking
| > This require FreeBSD version of vmnet driver
| > "
|
| Exactly, and vmware distribution have the sources of this driver.
| But this
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:34:04PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying the new port now. I seem to have a problem with the
> > vmware emulator program dying due to some panic caused by an
> > uncaught signal whenever I try to save a configuration.
>
> Same here. But that also happene
As Louis A. Mamakos wrote ...
> > >The console complaints about the ioctl are gone now. Unfortunately VMware
> > >still complains. I'll try to findout why.
> >
> > Try to load new vmware port from:
> > http://www.mindspring.com/~vsilyaev/vmware/files/vmware.tar.gz
> >
> > And reinstall it. I thi
The structures are identical because they are what the SCSI spec specifies
that's what they look like..
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
>
> > > @@ -1273,6 +1273,11 @@
> > > return error;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +case LINUX_
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > > + if (!error) {
> > > + lvol = *lvolp;
> > > + lvol.channel0 = bsd_vol.vol[0];
> > > + lvol.channel1 = bsd_vol.vol[1];
> > > + lvol.channel2 = bsd_vol.vol[2];
> > > + lvol.channel3 = bsd_vol.vol[3];
> >
> > FYI the k
Hi ...
> > to fit in with CDIOCGETVOL which has two different structures.
> >
> > Marcel please review this :)
>
> Please hold your horses. I have a completely rewritten linux_ioctl.c
> waiting to be committed. I'm already working on the ioctl stuff with
> Vladimir as to synchronize the change.
> > + {
> > + u_char channel0;
> > + u_char channel1;
> > + u_char channel2;
> > + u_char channel3;
> > + };
> > +
> > struct linux_cdrom_subchnl
> > {
> > u_char cdsc_format;
> > ***
> > *** 1232,1237
> > --- 1240,1261
>
>
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > + if (!error) {
> > + lvol = *lvolp;
> > + lvol.channel0 = bsd_vol.vol[0];
> > + lvol.channel1 = bsd_vol.vol[1];
> > + lvol.channel2 = bsd_vol.vol[2];
> > + lvol.channel3 = bsd_vol.vol[3];
>
> FYI the kernel structures are
Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
> I've made a change that removed the complaint from vmware before Vladimar
> fixed it in the kernel module. It is the implementation of LINUX_CDROMVOLREAD
> to fit in with CDIOCGETVOL which has two different structures.
>
> Marcel please review this :)
Please hold y
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote:
> > @@ -1273,6 +1273,11 @@
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> > +case LINUX_CDROMVOLREAD: {
> > + args->arg = CDIOGETVOL;
> > + return (ioctl(p, (struct ioctl_args *)args));
> > +}
> > +
> > case LINUX_OSS_GETVERSION: {
> >
Hi ...
> > > > to do?
> > >
> > > CDROMVOLREAD that you want to map to CDIOGETVOL.
That should read CDIOCGETVOL :)
> try this:
>
> Index: linux_ioctl.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/linux/linux_ioctl.c,v
> retrieving
> >The console complaints about the ioctl are gone now. Unfortunately VMware
> >still complains. I'll try to findout why.
>
> Try to load new vmware port from:
> http://www.mindspring.com/~vsilyaev/vmware/files/vmware.tar.gz
>
> And reinstall it. I think this may fix the problem.
>
I'm trying
>The console complaints about the ioctl are gone now. Unfortunately VMware
>still complains. I'll try to findout why.
Try to load new vmware port from:
http://www.mindspring.com/~vsilyaev/vmware/files/vmware.tar.gz
And reinstall it. I think this may fix the problem.
--
Vladimir Silyaev
To Un
As Alfred Perlstein wrote ...
> On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > CDROMVOLREAD that you want to map to CDIOGETVOL.
> > >
> > > IMO, you should download a recent Linux stable tree (2.2.13 should fit)
> >
> > Sounds like fair idea.
> >
> > > which is a single gzipped tar file. Then yo
On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> As Gerard Roudier wrote ...
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > > I get " LINUX: 'ioctl' fd=0, typ=0x53(S), num=0x13 not implemented "
> > > when attempting to configure a IDE cdrom under VMware (really coold BTW!!
> > > thanks f
As Gerard Roudier wrote ...
>
>
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> > I get " LINUX: 'ioctl' fd=0, typ=0x53(S), num=0x13 not implemented "
> > when attempting to configure a IDE cdrom under VMware (really coold BTW!!
> > thanks for the port development).
> >
> > Somebody close to a L
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
>
> Any wierd things I should do to get it running?
>
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 1999, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > > Wait... vmware for linux works under FreeBSD now??? or it just runs
> > > freebsd???
> >
> >It runs on FreeBSD.
Here's pointer to the announ
> Well, I personally was gonna try to get my already installed windows
> working... :-)
That's a really bad idea; the moment you run Windows under VMware it will
try to reconfigure itself for the new "hardware", and you'll screw your
old configuration.
--
\\ Give a man a fish, and you feed hi
As Chris Costello wrote ...
> On Tue, Nov 30, 1999, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > Wait... vmware for linux works under FreeBSD now??? or it just runs
> > freebsd???
>
>It runs on FreeBSD.
More precisely: on -current.
In the meantime I also gave it a shot on my dual-P100 SMP box.
This gav
Oops... not a member of that one... I'll go look then... :-) sorry to have
cross posted...
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and s
Well, I personally was gonna try to get my already installed windows
working... :-)
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and student
As Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote ...
> Wait... vmware for linux works under FreeBSD now??? or it just runs
> freebsd???
Vladimir has created a port of the Linux version that, although highly
experimental, works with -current as the host operating system.
> On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> Wait... vmware for linux works under FreeBSD now??? or it just runs
> freebsd???
You really need to go search the mailing list archives for the
discussion which has just occurred on this topic. Everything from
what it does to how to grab the port and apply the appropriate patches
to your kerne
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> I get " LINUX: 'ioctl' fd=0, typ=0x53(S), num=0x13 not implemented "
> when attempting to configure a IDE cdrom under VMware (really coold BTW!!
> thanks for the port development).
>
> Somebody close to a Linux box have an idea what this ioctl is suppo
Any wierd things I should do to get it running?
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and student at The | AIM: AgRSkaterq
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> Wait... vmware for linux works under FreeBSD now??? or it just runs
> freebsd???
It runs on FreeBSD.
--
|Chris Costello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|What do computer engineers use for birth control? Their personalities.
`--
Wait... vmware for linux works under FreeBSD now??? or it just runs
freebsd???
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best OS around.|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
| and student at Th
I get " LINUX: 'ioctl' fd=0, typ=0x53(S), num=0x13 not implemented "
when attempting to configure a IDE cdrom under VMware (really coold BTW!!
thanks for the port development).
Somebody close to a Linux box have an idea what this ioctl is supposed
to do?
Wilko
--
| / o / / _ Arnhem,
36 matches
Mail list logo
