:In article <005101c18ee1$9b5d66e0$fa01a8c0@ABERRATION>, Predius
:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
:>There are a couple known issues going on with the VIA Chipset line (Some
:>acknowledge by VIA partially, some not.) beyond just the 686B bug.
:>
:>Here's a couple sites with details. Myself, I think it'
In article <005101c18ee1$9b5d66e0$fa01a8c0@ABERRATION>, Predius
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>There are a couple known issues going on with the VIA Chipset line (Some
>acknowledge by VIA partially, some not.) beyond just the 686B bug.
>
>Here's a couple sites with details. Myself, I think it's a BI
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 03:15:15PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Pete French wrote:
> > > Anyhow since this is not always the case I did the fix for -current,
> > > granted it should not be in the ATA driver, but since nobody else
> > > really cared at the time
> >
> > Does this mean
t;
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: Need PCI/VIA chipset help (was Re: 4.4-STABLE crashes -
suspects new ata-driver over wd-drivers)
> > Anyhow since this is not always the case I did the fix for -current,
> > granted it should not be in the ATA driver, but since n
> Anyhow since this is not always the case I did the fix for -current,
> granted it should not be in the ATA driver, but since nobody else
> really cared at the time
Does this mean that if you dont have the ATA drivers in the kernel then
you wont get the fix ? As the bug occurs under high PCI
I am trying to determine if our ATA/VIA setup code may have issues. I
did a google search and came up with a linux-quirks patch which may
apply to the random corruption problems people have been reporting.
Here is the URL:
http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/v2.4/patch/patch-2.4.8
6 matches
Mail list logo
