On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 09:05:50AM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> I think we must wait until a 1.0 version is available.
>
> SVN is meant to be a replacement to CVS. The projects repository is using
> perforce which happens to be a good tool, so moving it to svn is probably not a
> step forwar
On Jan 11, 2004, at 5:19 PM, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 10:00 AM + 1/11/04, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 00:05, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> I disagree. Andrew raised two issues (type of license and
> port vs base location). The type of license is an input to
> the decision as to
At 10:00 AM + 1/11/04, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 00:05, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> I disagree. Andrew raised two issues (type of license and
> port vs base location). The type of license is an input to
> the decision as to which SCM to choose - BSD preferable ...
Subversion ha
--- Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 7:27 PM -0800 1/9/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> >Hi;
> >
> >There is a comparison here:
> >http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
> >
> >I think there are compelling reasons to try subversion,
> >but we have to wait for a 1.0 R
On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 00:05, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:01:13PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >At 9:35 PM + 1/10/04, Andrew Boothman wrote:
> >>Peter Schuller wrote:
> >>
> >>>Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed
> >>>on the project front page:
> >>
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed
on the project front page:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
A significant one of which is the fact that it's available
under a BSD-style license. Meaning that the project wouldn't
have to rely on more GPLed code.
I wonder i
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:01:13PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>At 9:35 PM + 1/10/04, Andrew Boothman wrote:
>>Peter Schuller wrote:
>>
>>>Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed
>>>on the project front page:
>>>
>>> http://subversion.tigris.org/
>>
>>A significant one of
At 9:35 PM + 1/10/04, Andrew Boothman wrote:
Peter Schuller wrote:
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed
on the project front page:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
A significant one of which is the fact that it's available
under a BSD-style license. Meaning that the project
Peter Schuller wrote:
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed on the project front
page:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
A significant one of which is the fact that it's available under a
BSD-style license. Meaning that the project wouldn't have to rely on
more GPLed code.
I
At 9:05 AM -0800 1/10/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
That's a pretty major test! Could we perhaps pick off
> something smaller? The "projects" repository, for
> instance? (or is that still tied to the base-system?)
SVN is meant to be a replacem
> I haven't been following this too closely, so forgive me if this has
> been mentioned. Does Subversion support any type of transaction based
> committing?
Yes. Commits are atomic.
Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed on the project front
page:
http://subversion.tigris.o
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 7:27 PM -0800 1/9/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
There is a comparison here:
http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
I think there are compelling reasons to try subversion,
but we have to wait for a 1.0 Release, and this would be
something that should
At 7:27 PM -0800 1/9/04, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi;
There is a comparison here:
http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
I think there are compelling reasons to try subversion,
but we have to wait for a 1.0 Release, and this would be
something that should be done gradually.. for ex
Hi;
There is a comparison here:
http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
I think there are compelling reasons to try subversion, but we have to wait for
a 1.0 Release, and this would be something that should be done gradually.. for
example moving the ports tree first.
cheers,
14 matches
Mail list logo
