On Tue, 18 Apr 2000 22:53:22 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
I'm not sure why sanity won here though. I guess it'll be done the
next time it comes up
Reason won in the Bourne shell case because ours is actively maintained.
Until ours is no longer actively maintained by a responsive,
I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might
have been asked before. Does the csh-tcsh move imply that sh-ksh will
be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago?
J~
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, James Howard wrote:
I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might
have been asked before. Does the csh-tcsh move imply that sh-ksh will
be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago?
No, it doesn't automatically mean that. The csh-tcsh
I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might
have been asked before. Does the csh-tcsh move imply that sh-ksh will
be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago?
*groan* shame on you ! Everyone went a step further and targeted
the sh - bash war !
I'm not
On Tue, 18 Apr 2000, Brian Somers wrote:
I don't get a lot of time to pay attention to the lists, so this might
have been asked before. Does the csh-tcsh move imply that sh-ksh will
be happening soon? Didn't NetBSD do that a while ago?
*groan* shame on you ! Everyone went a step
5 matches
Mail list logo