On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 03:15 +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 6/7/07, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is
there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading changes/gcc
changes (although I can't remember
On 6/8/07, Tom Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 03:15 +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
On 6/7/07, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is
there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading
I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is
there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading changes/gcc
changes (although I can't remember this kind of situation representing
a setback in other BSDs' case).
Thanks.
--
If it's there, and you can see it, it's
On 6/7/07, Vlad GALU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I couldn't help noticing that our gdb lags behind other BSDs. Is
there a technical reason for this? I'm thinking threading changes/gcc
changes (although I can't remember this kind of situation representing
a setback in other BSDs' case).
4 matches
Mail list logo