Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Bert JW Regeer wrote: Have the licensing issues been resolved with regards to DTrace? This is a feature I was looking forward to in 7.0-RELEASE but it had been delayed because of the licensing. The problems had to do with non-alignment of the licensing vs. software boun

Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-28 Thread Bert JW Regeer
On Nov 28, 2007, at 5:46 AM, Robert Watson wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote: Skip Ford wrote: Robert Watson wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote: - "-a" now means "all processes", Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a per-process too

Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote: Skip Ford wrote: Robert Watson wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote: - "-a" now means "all processes", Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a per-process tool. I was, but then I read your e-mail and became con

Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-28 Thread Skip Ford
Skip Ford wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote: >> - "-a" now means "all processes", >>> >>>Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a >>>per-process tool. >> >> I was, but then I read your e-mail and became convinced that the firs

Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-28 Thread Skip Ford
Robert Watson wrote: > On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote: > >>>- "-a" now means "all processes", >> >>Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a >>per-process tool. > > I was, but then I read your e-mail and became convinced that the first > patch that would be su

Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Skip Ford wrote: - "-a" now means "all processes", Thanks. :-) I'm a little surprised. You seemed pretty dedicated to a per-process tool. I was, but then I read your e-mail and became convinced that the first patch that would be submitted against procstat(1) would b

Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Wesley Shields wrote: Here's an updated patch to sys/amd64/amd64/db_trace.c (it's a diff against revision 1.81). It changes "register rbp" to be "register_t rbp" and fixes the extra "W" in TD_IS_SWAPPED. The kernel built fine after these changes. I'll test it out tomorr

Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-27 Thread Skip Ford
Robert Watson wrote: > I've updated the procstat(1) kernel patch and userland tool; the updated > version can be found at: > > http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20071127-procstat.tgz > > The new version includes a number of changes from the old version, > including: > > - "-a" now means

Re: Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-27 Thread Wesley Shields
On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:18:47PM +, Robert Watson wrote: > The last of these required new kernel changes, including an MD component. > I've tested the MD parts only on i386, although I have quick hacks at what > they should look like on amd64, arm, powerpc, sparc64, sun4v. I don't > promi

Updated procstat(1)

2007-11-27 Thread Robert Watson
Dear all, I've updated the procstat(1) kernel patch and userland tool; the updated version can be found at: http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/20071127-procstat.tgz The new version includes a number of changes from the old version, including: - A number of bug fixes and cleanliness imp