Status update:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-07/msg00102.html
I replied to the last email in the thread but haven't
heard back yet. Presumably I'll be maintaining the FreeBSD
x86_64 port.
I'm about to start work on the FreeBSD port now.
___
How's this all going?
I'm updating lang/gnat to gnat-2009 right now. In the
GNAT sources, it has build instructions including how
to build the cross - see below.
--
DE
--
-- BUILDING GNAT - EXAMPLE SEQUENCE --
--
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Hmm, if the system binutils is 2.15, then it should build
as a cross. You can do a cross build of all FreeBSD - I
think you just set TARGET=amd64 to build amd64 from
a different arch. Part of this process should be to
create a cross binutils
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Well, I used a newer binutils on sparc when I did the original
port. Once I built the cross compiler and binutils toolset,
I was done with it. After the native compiler is built using
the cross tools, you should be able to rebuild the native
On Tue, 19 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Well, I used a newer binutils on sparc when I did the original
port. Once I built the cross compiler and binutils toolset,
I was done with it. After the native compiler is built using
the
On Tue, 19 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Hmm, if the system binutils is 2.15, then it should build
as a cross. You can do a cross build of all FreeBSD - I
think you just set TARGET=amd64 to build amd64 from
a different arch. Part of
On 2009-05-19 09:51:08, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Even so, you shouldn't need a cross-binutils, only a native
(amd64) binutils. Your port won't be a cross port, but a
native amd64 port. The native amd64 GNAT will need a native
binutils, not a cross binutils. The only thing you will have
to
Hi.
After a week off, another update:
I've realised, too late, that I'm using a version of binutils
(2.19) that's incompatible with the system binutils (2.15).
Specifically, assembler code emitted by the native GNAT contains
.cfi_personality directives (and no doubt other things too) that
can't
On 2009-05-18 09:48:31, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
1. Compile binutils-2.15.
Unfortunately, compiling these as cross-binutils appear to be problematic:
gmake[3]: Entering directory `/root/memfs/c1-bu-obj/gas'
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I/root/binutils-2.15/gas -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE
On Mon, 18 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi.
After a week off, another update:
I've realised, too late, that I'm using a version of binutils
(2.19) that's incompatible with the system binutils (2.15).
Specifically, assembler code emitted by the native GNAT contains
Just an update.
Finally managed to get the i386 - amd64 compiler to compile
gcc 4.4.0. It took a few Makefile patches as for some reason,
cross compilation breaks gnatmake.
About to try to get the amd64 compiler to compile itself and
run the test suite.
Added a system-freebsd_x86_64.ads profile
On 2009-05-06 10:57:25, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Back in the day when I did it, it was with gcc-2.7.x or
gcc-2.8.x I believe. The cross build process with gnat
was a little different. I couldn't do a normal gnat build,
which did a bootstrap and then rebuilt the compiler again
using the
Hello.
I'm attempting to compile GNAT on AMD64 with an eye to
extending support to the platform (the gnat-gcc43 port
is ONLY_FOR_ARCH=i386).
GNAT obviously requires an Ada compiler to bootstrap.
What are my options here?
I suspect that I need to create an i386 jail to build
a cross compiler
On Mon, 4 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello.
I'm attempting to compile GNAT on AMD64 with an eye to
extending support to the platform (the gnat-gcc43 port
is ONLY_FOR_ARCH=i386).
GNAT obviously requires an Ada compiler to bootstrap.
What are my options here?
I suspect that I
On 2009-05-04 14:44:52, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Is that your only system (amd64)? I originally
ported GNAT to FreeBSD x86 from a solaris-sparc32 system.
I built a sparc-sun-freebsd GNAT cross compiler using
the native Solaris GNAT binary and its associated
sources. I also (first) had to cross
On Mon, 4 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-04 14:44:52, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Is that your only system (amd64)? I originally
ported GNAT to FreeBSD x86 from a solaris-sparc32 system.
I built a sparc-sun-freebsd GNAT cross compiler using
the native Solaris GNAT binary and
On 2009-05-04 15:03:32, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Right, you should be able to do it from either of those,
but perhaps the freebsd x86 may be easier.
I would use a PREFIX other than /usr/local (or something
different than whatever your actual PREFIX is) for the
builds.
I was looking around for
On Tue, 5 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-04 15:03:32, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Right, you should be able to do it from either of those,
but perhaps the freebsd x86 may be easier.
I would use a PREFIX other than /usr/local (or something
different than whatever your actual
On 2009-05-04 20:54:46, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Yes, you can look at my lang/gnat port to find its
bootstrap compiler. I would recommend making a binary
bootstrap compiler on the earliest version of FreeBSD
amd64 as you can. If you use 8.0-current for instance,
others will not be able to
On Tue, 5 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-04 20:54:46, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Yes, you can look at my lang/gnat port to find its
bootstrap compiler. I would recommend making a binary
bootstrap compiler on the earliest version of FreeBSD
amd64 as you can. If you use
20 matches
Mail list logo
