It seems Gersh wrote:
> Ive writen a quick patch for dev/ata/ata-disk.c:addump under
> 4.0-stable (03/26/01) which is considerbally faster.
>
> I did dumps on a SMP system with 512 megs of ram.
>
> Old: 201 seconds.
> New: 59 seconds.
>
> What I could gather from talking to people over irc/e
Yeah I noticed that apperently im on prety bad crack, Ill fix it.
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Paul Saab wrote:
> This does not include the write combined crashdump code. Please update
> your sources and you will see this change isn't necessary.
>
> paul
>
> Gersh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Ive w
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 16:33] wrote:
> > Gersh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Ive writen a quick patch for dev/ata/ata-disk.c:addump under
> > > 4.0-stable (03/26/01) which is considerbally faster.
> > >
> > > I did dumps on a SMP system with 512 megs of ram.
> > >
> >
> Gersh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Ive writen a quick patch for dev/ata/ata-disk.c:addump under
> > 4.0-stable (03/26/01) which is considerbally faster.
> >
> > I did dumps on a SMP system with 512 megs of ram.
> >
> > Old: 201 seconds.
> > New: 59 seconds.
> >
> > What I could gather fr
* Gersh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 15:50] wrote:
> Attatched is a updated version of the patch with a few ideas from the list
> aswell as cam/scsi/scsi_da.c modified aswell. Thanks for all the comments.
> #endif
> - printf("%ld ", (long)(count * DEV_BSIZE) / (1024 * 1024));
> +
This does not include the write combined crashdump code. Please update
your sources and you will see this change isn't necessary.
paul
Gersh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Ive writen a quick patch for dev/ata/ata-disk.c:addump under
> 4.0-stable (03/26/01) which is considerbally faster.
>
> I di
* Gersh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 14:14] wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > it could be replaced with:
> >
> > if (count % 10)
> > printf("%d ", count);
> >
> that acutally gives alot more output, The basic idea was
> to only print out when it got to certia
Attatched is a updated version of the patch with a few ideas from the list
aswell as cam/scsi/scsi_da.c modified aswell. Thanks for all the comments.
--- cam/scsi/scsi_da.c Mon Jan 17 06:27:37 2000
+++ cam/scsi/scsi_da.c.new Tue Mar 27 16:34:57 2001
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@
long
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Gersh wrote:
> > it could be replaced with:
> >
> > if (count % 10)
> > printf("%d ", count);
> >
> that acutally gives alot more output, The basic idea was
> to only print out when it got to certian increments 10, 20
> Mainly becasue of the problem with serial connecti
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Gersh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 13:41] wrote:
> > Ive writen a quick patch for dev/ata/ata-disk.c:addump under
> > 4.0-stable (03/26/01) which is considerbally faster.
> >
> > I did dumps on a SMP system with 512 megs of ram.
> >
> > Old: 20
* Gersh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 13:41] wrote:
> Ive writen a quick patch for dev/ata/ata-disk.c:addump under
> 4.0-stable (03/26/01) which is considerbally faster.
>
> I did dumps on a SMP system with 512 megs of ram.
>
> Old: 201 seconds.
> New: 59 seconds.
>
> What I could gather from
Ive writen a quick patch for dev/ata/ata-disk.c:addump under
4.0-stable (03/26/01) which is considerbally faster.
I did dumps on a SMP system with 512 megs of ram.
Old: 201 seconds.
New: 59 seconds.
What I could gather from talking to people over irc/email about the
problem was that there wa
12 matches
Mail list logo
