* David Malone (dwmal...@maths.tcd.ie) [990723 18:41]:
> if ((bi->bi_socktype == sep->se_socktype &&
> strcmp(bi->bi_service, sep->se_service) == 0) ||
> matchservent(bi->bi_service, sep->se_service,
>
* David Malone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990723 18:41]:
> if ((bi->bi_socktype == sep->se_socktype &&
> strcmp(bi->bi_service, sep->se_service) == 0) ||
> matchservent(bi->bi_service, sep->se_service,
>
I've found the problem - it looks like a bug in the code for matching
internal service names to /etc/service names. The code says:
if ((bi->bi_socktype == sep->se_socktype &&
strcmp(bi->bi_service, sep->se_service) == 0) ||
I've found the problem - it looks like a bug in the code for matching
internal service names to /etc/service names. The code says:
if ((bi->bi_socktype == sep->se_socktype &&
strcmp(bi->bi_service, sep->se_service) == 0) ||
Andre Albsmeier writes:
> Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine
> with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in
> each direction. Same result.
Weird. I'm unable to reproduce it; my test box responds to UDP queries
but does not log them (thou
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:35:48 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Andre Albsmeier writes:
> > Comes in private email. It's about 130KB after which tcpdump crashed with:
> >
> > zsh: 5741 segmentation fault tcpdump -i fxp0 150 udp or icmp
>
> Weird. Very weird.
Just to overcome speculations :-
Andre Albsmeier writes:
> Comes in private email. It's about 130KB after which tcpdump crashed with:
>
> zsh: 5741 segmentation fault tcpdump -i fxp0 150 udp or icmp
Weird. Very weird.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - d...@flood.ping.uio.no
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:16:14 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Sheldon Hearn writes:
> > I know exactly why you see what you see when you do what you do. All I
> > can say is "don't do that", because I can't think of a why to cater for
> > what you're doing in a sensible fashion.
>
> I think
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:09:12 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
>
> Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-)
Sorry. The machine wasn't stressed by other programs so
it was "the
Sheldon Hearn writes:
> I know exactly why you see what you see when you do what you do. All I
> can say is "don't do that", because I can't think of a why to cater for
> what you're doing in a sensible fashion.
I think you're jumping to conclusions. What I'd like to see is a
tcpdump log of the U
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-)
> On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > What does "sucking all the CPU time" mean? Does it mean that other
> > pro
Andre Albsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just to overcome speculations :-) I just tested it on another machine
> with the same result. If have tested it now between all 3 machines in
> each direction. Same result.
Weird. I'm unable to reproduce it; my test box responds to UDP queries
but doe
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> [Hijacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all]
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:28:12 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > I observed some kind of denial of service on -STABLE: I was
> > playing with the new nmap and did a 'nmap -sU printfix'.
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:35:48 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Andre Albsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Comes in private email. It's about 130KB after which tcpdump crashed with:
> >
> > zsh: 5741 segmentation fault tcpdump -i fxp0 150 udp or icmp
>
> Weird. Very weird.
Just to over
Andre Albsmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Comes in private email. It's about 130KB after which tcpdump crashed with:
>
> zsh: 5741 segmentation fault tcpdump -i fxp0 150 udp or icmp
Weird. Very weird.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:16:14 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I know exactly why you see what you see when you do what you do. All I
> > can say is "don't do that", because I can't think of a why to cater for
> > what you're doing in a sensible f
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 15:09:12 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
>
> Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-)
Sorry. The machine wasn't stressed by other programs so
it was "the
[Hijacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all]
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:28:12 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> I observed some kind of denial of service on -STABLE: I was
> playing with the new nmap and did a 'nmap -sU printfix'.
> inetd was running as "inetd -l" and started sucking all the
> CPU time
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I know exactly why you see what you see when you do what you do. All I
> can say is "don't do that", because I can't think of a why to cater for
> what you're doing in a sensible fashion.
I think you're jumping to conclusions. What I'd like to see is a
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 15:06:02 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> But when inetd is run without -l it get 100%.
Are you avoiding my question on purpose? :-)
> On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> > What does "sucking all the CPU time" mean? Does it mean that other
> > pr
On Fri, 23-Jul-1999 at 14:29:19 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
>
> [Hijacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all]
>
> On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:28:12 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
>
> > I observed some kind of denial of service on -STABLE: I was
> > playing with the new nmap and did a 'nmap -sU printfix'
[Hijacked from cvs-committers and cvs-all]
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999 11:28:12 +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> I observed some kind of denial of service on -STABLE: I was
> playing with the new nmap and did a 'nmap -sU printfix'.
> inetd was running as "inetd -l" and started sucking all the
> CPU time
22 matches
Mail list logo
