process `vnlru' to stop...done
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop...
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...6 5 3 1 0 0 done
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done
All buffers synced.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mo
on signal 15
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...done
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `syncer' to stop...
Syncing disks, vnodes remaining...6 5 3 1 0 0 done
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `bufdaemon' to stop...done
All buffers synced.
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:58:05PM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, 08:45-0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:22:40PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > > I had one of these [kernel panics] a couple of weeks ago or so...
> > > ...[upgrade to -STABLE as
On Fri, 16 Jun 2006, 08:45-0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:22:40PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > I had one of these [kernel panics] a couple of weeks ago or so...
> > ...[upgrade to -STABLE as of 15 June; repeat panic]...
>
> The message to which I'm replying (posted
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:22:40PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I had one of these [kernel panics] a couple of weeks ago or so...
> ...[upgrade to -STABLE as of 15 June; repeat panic]...
The message to which I'm replying (posted to -stable) has the
particulars about the panic in question, and t
thanks,
i will try INVARIANTS and WITNESS options and will try to get
freebsd 6.0. it will be only tomorrow when i'll be able to do this
because it is already evening and i will go to my office tomorrow
only.
in the mean time if the memory corruption is the problem then is there
any optio
Hi,
On 12/25/05, kamal kc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Is the problem related to memory leaks or sleeping
> on mutexes or some other causes.
>From the backtrace you have provided, it looks like a memory
corruption. In order to aid your debugging, you will want INVARIANTS
and WITESS, etc. t
al kc
Panic message:-->
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address=0x6c
fault code =supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer=0x8:0xc052eafd
stack pointer=0x10:0xd50349d0
frame pointer=0x10:0xd50349d4
code segm
s.
> This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd".
>
> Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
>
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
> fault virtual address = 0x0
> fault code = supervisor re
conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for
details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd".
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mo
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 02:47 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> > > I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine
> > > is an NFS server, and it usua
On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> > I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> > an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> > people try to access it.
On Friday 02 December 2005 14.54, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> > I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> > an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> > people try to access it.
On Friday 02 December 2005 05:00 am, Yuri Khotyaintsev wrote:
> I have the following panic occurring several times a week. The machine is
> an NFS server, and it usually panics early in the morning, when first
> people try to access it. After reboot it may work OK for 1-2 days, and then
> panics ag
"i386-marcel-freebsd".
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x74
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x20:0xc053a426
s
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, ALeine wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > We have two NFS file servers running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 on
> > Dell Poweredge 1750's that crash randomly. They each have about 1.3TB
> > of disk. They are used to server email and web content to several
> > WEB/EMAIL server
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We have two NFS file servers running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 on
> Dell Poweredge 1750's that crash randomly. They each have about 1.3TB
> of disk. They are used to server email and web content to several
> WEB/EMAIL servers. Followin is the console log messages and the
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, David Rice wrote:
> We have two NFS file servers running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 on Dell
> Poweredge 1750's that crash randomly. They each have about 1.3TB of
> disk. They are used to server email and web content to several WEB/EMAIL
> servers. Followin is the console log me
6 (send_nsca), uid 0: exited on signal 11
(core dumped)
ufs_rename: fvp == tvp (can't happen)
ufs_rename: fvp == tvp (can't happen)
ufs_rename: fvp == tvp (can't happen)
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; apic id = 06
fault virtual address = 0x20
fault cod
> If this is how I got most of my panics, this little script running in
> two different xterms helped decrease the time to panic. It got my
> system to panic a lot with the older nvidia drivers.
[script trimmed out]
> This always helped get my system unstable on 4-STABLE rather quickly. I
> thi
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Kevin Brunelle wrote:
Alright, this is driving me nuts. For a little while there I could
not get the system to panic -- it would spontaniously reboot when
running a GL program instead of panic. This afternoon it finally
panic'd (who would think that would be something I want
Alright, this is driving me nuts. For a little while there I could not
get the system to panic -- it would spontaniously reboot when running a
GL program instead of panic. This afternoon it finally panic'd (who
would think that would be something I want to see but it was).
I am attaching the tra
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 11:22:43AM -0400, Kevin Brunelle wrote:
> Okay,
>
> Replication does not look like it will be an issue. Again, the system
> panic'd while running a gl application when I was at work. This time I
> did get a core dump (but I still don't have a debugging kernel -- it was
>
Okay,
Replication does not look like it will be an issue. Again, the system
panic'd while running a gl application when I was at work. This time I
did get a core dump (but I still don't have a debugging kernel -- it was
building ARG).
Right now, I am going to disable my screensaver and carefull
33:50 fnord kernel: syncing disks, buffers remaining... kernel trap 12 with
interrupts disabled
Aug 20 07:33:50 fnord kernel:
Aug 20 07:33:50 fnord kernel:
Aug 20 07:33:50 fnord kernel: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Aug 20 07:33:50 fnord kernel: fault virtual address = 0x24
A
[Moving to -net]
If memory serves me right, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > Alternately, it would be a good idea to have a "ip_maxpacketfrags"
> > instead of an "ip_maxfragpackets", to put a hard limit on the
> > number of mbufs that can be consumed by the fragment reassembly
> > process.
>
> I
Terry Lambert writes:
> Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> > The problem is that ip_maxfragpackets is:
> > "Maximum number of IPv4 fragment reassembly queue entries"
> >
> > You (& I, & most people probably) took that number to mean the cap on
> > the number of mbufs sitting on reassembly queues. H
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> The problem is that ip_maxfragpackets is:
> "Maximum number of IPv4 fragment reassembly queue entries"
>
> You (& I, & most people probably) took that number to mean the cap on
> the number of mbufs sitting on reassembly queues. However, its really
> a cap on the number
Bruce A. Mah writes:
>
> I was discussing this with some of my cow-orkers, as we've had a similar
> situation (cluster mbufs getting temporarily depleted on a
> 4.5-RELEASE-p2 NFS server with Linux and FreeBSD clients, but no kernel
> panics). Shouldn't the net.inet.ip.maxfragpackets sysct
If memory serves me right, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>
> Will Froning writes:
> > I have a 4.5-RELEASE-p2 box that is my Firewall/NAT/NFS server. As a
> > NFS client I have a RH7.2 linux box. When I do massive NFS writes to
> > my FBSD (from RH7.2 box), I get a panic. I've attached the info I
Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> While the fix being discussed by Peter & others will prevent panics,
> the linux box will still run your server out of mbufs clusters. This
> is happening because the linux box is using a 16K write size over UDP
> by default. This is a stupid default. If there is any lo
Will Froning writes:
> I have a 4.5-RELEASE-p2 box that is my Firewall/NAT/NFS server. As a
> NFS client I have a RH7.2 linux box. When I do massive NFS writes to
> my FBSD (from RH7.2 box), I get a panic. I've attached the info I got
> from my debug kernel.
>
While the fix being discus
Terry Lambert wrote:
> David Greenman wrote:
> > >#16 0xc0152220 in tsleep ()
> > >#17 0xc016abfe in m_clalloc_wait ()
> > >#18 0xc01c8b14 in nfs_realign ()
> > >#19 0xc01c9653 in nfsrv_rcv ()
> > >#20 0xc01701d0 in sowakeup ()
> > >#21 0xc01abd7c in udp_input ()
> > >#22 0xc01a1bfb in ip_input ()
Peter Wemm wrote:
> > You will need to modify nfs_realign() to take a waitflag,
+++
> > as propagated from nfsrv_rcv()... and then pass it through
*
> Terry, if you spent half of the time reading the code as s
David Greenman wrote:
> >#16 0xc0152220 in tsleep ()
> >#17 0xc016abfe in m_clalloc_wait ()
> >#18 0xc01c8b14 in nfs_realign ()
> >#19 0xc01c9653 in nfsrv_rcv ()
> >#20 0xc01701d0 in sowakeup ()
> >#21 0xc01abd7c in udp_input ()
> >#22 0xc01a1bfb in ip_input ()
> >#23 0xc01a1c5b in ipintr ()
>
>
>Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>fault virtual address = 0x70
>#12 0xc014f61d in panic ()
>#13 0xc025c02f in trap_fatal ()
>#14 0xc025bcdd in trap_pfault ()
>#15 0xc025b883 in trap ()
>#16 0xc0152220 in tsleep ()
>#17 0xc016abfe in m_clalloc_wa
Will Froning wrote:
> #12 0xc014f61d in panic ()
> #13 0xc025c02f in trap_fatal ()
> #14 0xc025bcdd in trap_pfault ()
> #15 0xc025b883 in trap ()
> #16 0xc0152220 in tsleep ()
> #17 0xc016abfe in m_clalloc_wait ()
The tsleep tried to reference a page that wasn't there. This
supposedly can't happ
ess 0x002d6fa0
panicstr: page fault
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x70
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0152220
stack pointer = 0x10:0xc02ade58
frame pointer
> Now, today the machine was rebooting over and over again, freezing with
> this message:
>
>
> fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>
> fault virtual address = 0xc33a3c6d
>
> fault code = supervisor read, page not present
>
> Instruction Pointer =
with
this message:
fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0xc33a3c6d
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
Instruction Pointer = 0x8:0xc022798F
Stack Pointer = 0x 10: 0xc5dc6988
code segment = base 0 x0, limit 0xf type 0x1b
= DPL
40 matches
Mail list logo
