Re: geom_mirror implementation

On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 10:20:23AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: +> With regards to the larger "volume management picture" I will +> reiterate my position: +> +> Ideally I would prefer to have a set of primitive GEOM classes, +> GEOM_MIRROR, GEOM_STRIPE, GEOM_RAID5 etc and a separate set of +> "

Re: geom_mirror implementation

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Schultz writes: >On Sun, Nov 09, 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: >> Hi hackers@, >> >> I've played around with GEOM a bit and beefed up geom_mirror, which is >> already in the tree but not built yet. >> >> You can find the patch at

Re: geom_mirror implementation

On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > I've start some work on more advance RAID implementation wich should > fit to GEOM just fine. Every RAID level will be a different GEOM class, > but with one configuration utility. All classes will share as many code as > possible to be flexible in

Re: geom_mirror implementation

Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote this message on Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:51 +0100: > I've start some work on more advance RAID implementation wich should > fit to GEOM just fine. Every RAID level will be a different GEOM class, > but with one configuration utility. All classes will share as many code as >

Re: geom_mirror implementation

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 01:34:50PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: +> > > > I've played around with GEOM a bit and beefed up geom_mirror, which is +> > > > already in the tree but not built yet. +> > > > +> > > > You can find the patch at . +> > > +> > > Hmm

Re: geom_mirror implementation

It seems Lukas Ertl wrote: > > If there's a good reason ccd(4) is harder to fix than geom_mirror, then > > you might want to talk to phk about rewriting geom_ccd based on > > geom_mirror. I believe scottl and phk have plans to fix raidframe, > > though, which would address a lot of the present lim

Re: geom_mirror implementation

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > If there's a good reason ccd(4) is harder to fix than geom_mirror, then > > you might want to talk to phk about rewriting geom_ccd based on > > geom_mirror. I believe scottl and phk have plans to fix raidframe, > > though, which would address a lot of th

Re: geom_mirror implementation

On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, David Schultz wrote: > Yeah, RAID support in FreeBSD is in a rather sorry state right > now. ccd(4) doesn't work with ATAng on my machine without causing > panics and data corruption, raidframe is broken in -CURRENT, and > vinum tends to lag behind changes and break. But that

Re: geom_mirror implementation

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003, Christian Laursen wrote: > David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > > Hi hackers@, > > > > > > I've played around with GEOM a bit and beefed up geom_mirror, which is > > > already in the tree but not built yet. > > > > > >

Re: geom_mirror implementation

David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Nov 09, 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > > Hi hackers@, > > > > I've played around with GEOM a bit and beefed up geom_mirror, which is > > already in the tree but not built yet. > > > > You can find the patch at

Re: geom_mirror implementation

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote: > Hi hackers@, > > I've played around with GEOM a bit and beefed up geom_mirror, which is > already in the tree but not built yet. > > You can find the patch at . Hmm...I believe geom_mirror is supposed to be an e

geom_mirror implementation

Hi hackers@, I've played around with GEOM a bit and beefed up geom_mirror, which is already in the tree but not built yet. You can find the patch at . The patch does the following: *) modify geom_mirror.c and add a sync, a config, a dumpconf and a dest