On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:32:16AM +0100, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
> On Thursday 05 Jul 2012 13:09:05 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > Doug Barton wrote:
> > > ... something like this would be *really* valuable to ease
> > > the transition for people coming from a Linux background.
> >
> > I'm
On Thursday 05 Jul 2012 13:09:05 per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > ... something like this would be *really* valuable to ease
> > the transition for people coming from a Linux background.
>
> I'm sure some folks here would count this as a reason *not*
> to provide it >:->
>
Doug Barton wrote:
> ... something like this would be *really* valuable to ease
> the transition for people coming from a Linux background.
I'm sure some folks here would count this as a reason *not*
to provide it >:->
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org m
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:11:10AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-Jul-04 19:10:08 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
> >My first thought was to suggest it be a port as well, but I'm not sure
> >that can be done sanely.
>
> The easiest way is probably to implement some form of generic "command
> not
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 04:44:48PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 16:41, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:59:29PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> On 07/04/2012 15:55, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
> >>> Seeing as sudo plays a big part of this
> >>
> >> No ... n
On 2012-Jul-04 19:10:08 -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
>My first thought was to suggest it be a port as well, but I'm not sure
>that can be done sanely.
The easiest way is probably to implement some form of generic "command
not found" hook into sh(1) and tcsh(1) - in interactive mode, if a
specific fun
On 07/04/2012 16:41, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 03:59:29PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 07/04/2012 15:55, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>>> Seeing as sudo plays a big part of this
>>
>> No ... not only is sudo not a necessary component, it shouldn't be
>> involved at all.
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 16:01:40 -0700
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 15:57, Yuri wrote:
> > On 07/04/2012 15:08, Doug Barton wrote:
> >> First, I agree that being able to turn it off should be possible. But I
> >> can't help being curious ... why would you *not* want a feature that
> >> tells yo
On 07/04/2012 15:57, Yuri wrote:
> On 07/04/2012 15:08, Doug Barton wrote:
>> First, I agree that being able to turn it off should be possible. But I
>> can't help being curious ... why would you *not* want a feature that
>> tells you what to install if you type a command that doesn't exist on
>> t
9 matches
Mail list logo
