Well, I humbly submit that we should kill this thread :)
The original poster's question was easily solved by reading the handbook.
Furthermore, we have come to no concensus on improvements to the handbook (e.g.
wiki, etc.). Hence, I propose we backburner this topic until a situation arises
where
Terry Lambert writes:
> Bakul Shah wrote:
> > > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > > any set of choices, before you get to what y
"R. David Murray" wrote:
> Sorry for dropping in to the middle of a conversation, but this
> comment puzzles me. I fail to see how:
>
> handbook + per-page comments from readers
>
> is *inferior* to:
>
>handbook with no comments
>
> given that the handbook maintainers do not have infina
Bakul Shah wrote:
> > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > any set of choices, before you get to what you want (HCI studies
> > at Bell
Terry Lambert writes:
> JJ Behrens wrote:
> > The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end o
> f
> > every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve
> to
> > enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the
> same
Thus spake R. David Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 3 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > any
6 matches
Mail list logo
