Re: wfd.c and ATAPI Zip

1999-06-07 Thread Junichi Satoh
My thoughts now are: 1) My two drive are somewhat 'rogue' in that they don't conform to the driver's expectations. 2) When the driver was written, the '!strcmp' should be 'strcmp' since strcmp returns 0 when equal (-1 or 1 when or ), in which case my patch makes sense: ---

Re: wfd.c and ATAPI Zip

1999-06-07 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Junichi Satoh wrote: Hmm... I have an ATAPI ZIP drive: wdc0: unit 1 (atapi): IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI/23.D, removable, intr, iordis wfd1: medium type unknown (no disk) wfd1: buggy Zip drive,

Re: wfd.c and ATAPI Zip

1999-06-07 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
Here is a patch that checks for the revision numbers instead of simply the inquiry string (and adds my buggy revision): --- wfd.c.orig Thu Feb 18 17:06:08 1999 +++ wfd.c Mon Jun 7 12:02:25 1999 @@ -243,17 +243,21 @@ return -1; /* -* The IOMEGA ZIP 100, at

Re: wfd.c and ATAPI Zip

1999-06-07 Thread Mike Smith
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Junichi Satoh wrote: Hmm... I have an ATAPI ZIP drive: wdc0: unit 1 (atapi): IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI/23.D, removable, intr, iordis wfd1: medium type unknown (no disk) wfd1: buggy

Re: wfd.c and ATAPI Zip

1999-06-07 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Mike Smith wrote: 12.A, 21.*, and 23.* are known to be buggy...13.A doesn't appear to be. Since the current method of sorting out the revisions doesn't seem to be perfect, would it be acceptible to consider them all buggy unless known not to be (i.e. compare

Re: wfd.c and ATAPI Zip

1999-06-07 Thread Mike Smith
On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Mike Smith wrote: 12.A, 21.*, and 23.* are known to be buggy...13.A doesn't appear to be. Since the current method of sorting out the revisions doesn't seem to be perfect, would it be acceptible to consider them all buggy unless known not to be (i.e. compare

Re: wfd.c and ATAPI Zip

1999-06-07 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: I have an off-brand (NEC) Zip Drive with: IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI Floppy/12.A which does have buggy firmware; I also have another one with: IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI/13.A that has no problem when I remove the 64 block limitation.

wfd.c and ATAPI Zip

1999-06-06 Thread Chris D. Faulhaber
I have two boxes with ATAPI Zip Drives: Box1: wdc1: unit 1 (atapi): IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI Floppy/12.A, removable, intr, iordis wfd0: medium type unknown (no disk) Box2: wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): IOMEGA ZIP 100 ATAPI/13.A, removable, intr, iordis wfd0: medium type unknown (no disk)