On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Michal wrote:
> On 25/05/2010 04:57, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>> I think everyone is staying clear of ipfw at the moment as Luigi is
>> dong work on it. if he gets done with his new work he will hopefully
>> address the many ipfw bugs currently reported.
>
> Excus
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 01:19:32AM -0700, bored to death wrote:
>> thank you luigi for your reply, it helped.
>>
>> i changed the hz parameter to 1000 and then 4000 and then 8000 in my
>> /boot/loader.conf. the result got much better.
>> i conf
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Gareth de Vaux wrote:
> Hi all, for some reason these rules get loaded on boot up before the
> ones I specify in a file:
>
> 00100 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0
> 00200 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8
> 00300 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:44 AM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> In the past I have used this patch by Luigi Rizzo, which helped me well.
>
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2003-September/000526.html
>
> I tried with a friend to port it to -STABLE, but we were not able to
> find
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
[SNIP]
> Luiz has added it to: http://loos.no-ip.org:280/lusca_bridge.diff
>
> I have tested and it works pretty well.
>
> I hope someone can add it to -HEAD, so we won't loose it again.
2011/1/6 Pawel Tyll :
> Hi lists,
>
> I've reported this problem:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=152360
>
> and ever since 8.1-RELEASE this machine keeps panicking every two weeks
> or so. Any help will be much appreciated. I'll be happy to provide any
> more info to help tracking thi
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> One more question tough,
>
> I have 4 identical machines, also with em-driven NICs - yet this is
> the only one that dies like this. OTOH Other machines don't do traffic
> shaping and do not use ipfw that extensively. Does this match your
> theo
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Ian Smith wrote:
> Folks,
>
> [ If someone implements an /etc/rc.d/ipfw reload command that reliably
> works over a remote session without any open firewall window, great, but
> I'd rather not discuss the related issues below in reponses to any PR ]
>
> In order to
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Pawel Tyll wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011, Brandon Gooch wrote:
>> It's likely that the mbuf handling problem (in em_refresh_mbufs()) is
>> triggered by the processing you're doing with ipfw (or elsewhere for
>> that matter), so, y
2011/2/19 Pawel Tyll :
> Hi guys, lists,
>
> It's me, the bi-weekly panic guy. Guess what, it crashed today. As an
> act of desperation I disabled the pipe dumping script after previous
> crash, which today turned out to be merely a coincidence and didn't
> prevent panics. (I thought it to be a lon
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> I've never seen a trace like this, and no absolutely nothing about dummynet,
> sorry.
> If it is in some way em's fault, then making sure you have the latest code
> would be
> a good idea. I have a test driver that is under selective test, it do
11 matches
Mail list logo
