Dennis Olvany wrote:
What does your setup look like?
Don't have a setup, yet. In lieu of such complexity, I may abandon the
notion.
Start of IPFW rules file ###
End of IPFW rules file ###
AT Matik wrote:
On Monday 02 January 2006 11:12, G Bryant wrote:
I used the different groups (e.g. $u512k) to split the internal IP range
into IP groups that get different bandwidth according to personal
preference or whatever.
Currently it is not being used as the whole range is being
AT Matik wrote:
On Monday 02 January 2006 07:15, G Bryant wrote:
# Users with 512Kb / 256Kb access (in)
$cmd 4200 pipe 10 ip from any to $u512k in via $ext_if1
$bwm 10 config mask dst-ip 0x00ff bw 512Kbit/s queue 4KBytes
# Users with 256Kb / 128Kb access
$cmd pipe 20 ip from any to
AT Matik wrote:
On Monday 02 January 2006 07:15, G Bryant wrote:
# Users with 512Kb / 256Kb access (in)
$cmd 4200 pipe 10 ip from any to $u512k in via $ext_if1
$bwm 10 config mask dst-ip 0x00ff bw 512Kbit/s queue 4KBytes
# Users with 256Kb / 128Kb access
$cmd pipe 20 ip from any to
Dennis Olvany wrote:
It is possible to do load sharing, but not balancing in the true
sense of the word. You need to use ipfw's FWD rule to forward (push)
packets to the different gateways of the 4 WAN links, but it get's a
bit more complicated from there.
To do this using forwarding to
Dennis Olvany wrote:
Let's say that I wanted to balance upstream traffic across four WAN
links to the same ISP and default gateway using IPFW probabilities.
Can the FreeBSD routing table contain multiple routes to the same
destination?
How would a route be selected and could such a selection b
Rob Viau wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote:
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some
software that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
G Bryant escreveu:
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
Complicated ? Its possible ?
TELECOM
LOAD SHARING PER PACKET
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
Complicated ? Its possible ?
TELECOM
LOAD SHARING PER PACKET
--
| | |
work range
# ${fwcmd} add deny ip from ${iif} to any in via ${oif}
# Stop spoofing from inside your private ip range
# ${fwcmd} add deny ip from not ${iif} to any in via ${iif}
G Bryant wrote:
Hi,
I found my rules worked best in this order:
(You will need to correct the syntax - just typed up
Hi,
I found my rules worked best in this order:
(You will need to correct the syntax - just typed up the order for you
quickly)
Deny spoofed
Allow localhost
Allow all from any to any via $iif
divert natd all from any to any in via $oif
#insert bandwidth shaping rules
skipto 5000 all from $iip t
Greetings,
2 uplinks with bandwidth management, load splitting and fail-over. Working
For those interested in an alternate method of doing the same thing -
here are some basics.
You could probably modify the script rules and sets to do crude load
balancing between the lines too - but more of tha
# ifconfig -a
rl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
options=8
inet 192.168.8.70 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.8.255
inet 192.168.0.99 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
ether 00:11:95:5a:e2:da
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
status: active
Not sure if previous posts came through, so please forgive if this is a
repeat.
Can anybody please help with problem.
Using natd and ipfw and trying to fwd packets to a non-default router
out the same interface.
Currently using alias for the second ip, but it doesn't seem to be
working for som
Anybody help with difference between ifconfig: clone or alias?
Trying to ipfw fwd packets to non-default router out the same interface.
Currently using alias, but not working for some unexplainable reason.
Would clone work?
Thanks Graham
___
freebsd-i
You could use ipfw sets and disable the sets at the start of the script
- excluding the pass-thru rules.
My rc.firewall script disables all the scripts and only enables the ones
I want. I can then run scripts from cron to enable/ disable any sets I
like. You can load all the rules you want int
Hi all,
I have a problem i'm trying to figure out with FreeBSD5.4, natd and ipfw
fwd command.
Have a box acting as a gateway with relevant kernel options compiled in.
External NIC with inet x.y.1.10 and inet x.y.2.10 alias
(I also tried using 2 seperate NIC's with the above 2 ip's, but no joy
Thanks for the help.
I am trying to do load-balancing using 2 ISP's. Mostly traffic from the
LAN.
I will look at possible routing, but don't see how I can manipulate
outgoing packets to split the outgoing load between the two external NIC's.
Anybody done this before?
Thanks
Gray
vladone wrot
Hi all,
I hope someone can help me with a routing / Natd / ipfw problem i'm having.
Setup description:
1x FreeBSD 5.4
3x NIC's: 1x LAN, 2x connected to external DSL modems
int_if - LAN
ext_if1 - ISP1
ext_if2 - ISP2
Both dsl modems use NAT too, so it is a nat - nat, but did have it
working for a
19 matches
Mail list logo
