Hi, All!
I have written a small patch for a packets
tagging with ipfw.
The description of OpenBSD packet tagging is here:
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tagging.html
An IPFW tags is not compatible with PF tags.
This feature can be usable with some netgraph modules.
We can create a netgraph node
Hi, All!
I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch
is small, so it simply can't be any bugs there ;)].
P
Vadim Goncharov wrote:
Hi, All!
I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch
is small, so it simply can't b
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:32:22AM -0300, Patrick Tracanelli wrote:
> Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> > Hi, All!
> >
> > I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
> > http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
> >
> > Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
12.05.06 в 20:53 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
> http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
>
> Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
> load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch
> is small, so it
12.05.06 в 20:53 Luigi Rizzo в своём письме писал(а):
> I've tried Andrey Elsukov's ipfw "tag/tagged" patches from:
> http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw_tags/
>
> Tested on 5.5-PRERELEASE production server with moderate
> load - rock stable [I've also looked through the code - patch
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:50:10PM +0700, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching
> range of tags? For example:
>
> ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20
i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code
for ma
12.05.06 22:56 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching
range of tags? For example:
ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20
i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code
for matching port ranges etc to implement
Vadim Goncharov wrote:
12.05.06 22:56 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of matching
range of tags? For example:
ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20
i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code
for matching por
13.05.06 @ 16:38 Julian Elischer wrote:
A question about features: is it worth adding functionality of
matching
range of tags? For example:
ipfw add pass ip from any to any tagged 1-5,10,20
i think it is a useful feature, and if you reuse the existing code
for matching port ranges etc to i
On Saturday 13 May 2006 07:08, Vadim Goncharov wrote:
> >
> > would be cool however.
>
> May be, but I can't imagine a real situation where it can be useful,
> as tables already contain IP adresses. Can you give a real-life
> example where it helps ?
cool = good
may be = wonderful
can't imagine =
Hi Andrey,
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 10:41:14AM +0400, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:
> Hi, All!
>
> I have written a small patch for a packets
> tagging with ipfw.
>
> The description of OpenBSD packet tagging is here:
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/tagging.html
>
> An IPFW tags is not compatible wit
21.06.06 @ 16:41 Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Looking at the patch lets me see that you are using the generic mbuf
tags. This means the tag should be available along the packet's
trip through the kernel. Would it be possible to slightly modify
the routing code in order to make those tags a routing cr
Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
trip through the kernel. Would it be possible to slightly modify
the routing code in order to make those tags a routing criteria ?
You can use tags with a fwd rules, like a:
# ipfw add fwd $gw_addr ip from any to any tagged $N
And as i know, oleg@ has committed a new
14 matches
Mail list logo
