Re: conf/142972: [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail

2010-01-21 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Philipp Wuensche wrote: > I'm taking this off bug-followup for now. > > David BERARD wrote: >>> I did some testing with vnet and I find the way of using _poststart and >>> _afterstart to configure ip-addr. inside a vimage jail very impractical. >>> First we loose all the nice features of configuri

Re: conf/142972: [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail

2010-01-21 Thread Philipp Wuensche
I'm taking this off bug-followup for now. David BERARD wrote: >> I did some testing with vnet and I find the way of using _poststart and >> _afterstart to configure ip-addr. inside a vimage jail very impractical. >> First we loose all the nice features of configuring ipaddrs. via >> ipv4_addrs_if

Re: conf/142972: [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail

2010-01-21 Thread David BERARD
The following reply was made to PR conf/142972; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David BERARD To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org Cc: Philipp Wuensche Subject: Re: conf/142972: [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:55:10 +0100 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed me

Re: conf/142972: [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail

2010-01-21 Thread Philipp Wuensche
Philipp Wuensche wrote: > > And shouldn't we implement all the new-style features while we at it? > All the allow.* stuff, cpuset etc. I did some testing with vnet and I find the way of using _poststart and _afterstart to configure ip-addr. inside a vimage jail very impractical. First we loose al

Re: conf/142972: [jail] [patch] Support JAILv2 and vnet in rc.d/jail

2010-01-21 Thread Philipp Wuensche
David BERARD wrote: > + > + # Append address to list of addresses for the jail comman= > d. > + case "${_type}" in > + "inet") case "${_addrlv4}" in > + "") _addrlv4=3D"${_addr}" ;; > + *) _addrlv4

RE: 32-bit jails on a 64-bit system?

2010-01-21 Thread Andrew Hotlab
> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 10:12:20 +0100 > From: 000.f...@quip.cz > To: sp...@bway.net > CC: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org; freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: 32-bit jails on a 64-bit system? > >> The jail(8) subsystem has been updated. Changes include: >>

Re: 32-bit jails on a 64-bit system?

2010-01-21 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Charles Sprickman wrote: Howdy, I saw this little tidbit in the 8.0 Release Notes... The jail(8) subsystem has been updated. Changes include: Compatibility support which permits 32-bit jail binaries to be used on 64-bit systems to manage jails has been added. I know prior to 8.0 wit