Hi,
At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and
~2000 clients (cable modem network).
At full speed (34Mbit) CPU usage is 0% and system load is 0.0 :-)
The solution was to find proper ip_nat.h file and properly define compile-time
parameters.
Thanks all for you hel
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy Korud wrote:
>
> Hi,
> At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and
> ~2000 clients (cable modem network).
> At full speed (34Mbit) CPU usage is 0% and system load is 0.0 :-)
>
It'd be really interesting to see how natd would handle su
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Kenneth W Cochran wrote:
> Hello:
>
> Is there anything for FreeBSD that's analogous to Linux's
> "mii-diag" program? I'm (still) trying to troubleshoot
> a card's (mis)communication with a router.
Not at this time, although it would be very useful...
Mike "Silby" Silbersa
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 04:34:57PM -0600, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> If someone can tell me how to dump 802.11 packets for the purpose of
> debugging this issue, I'd be happy to do so.
I recently committed a port of the current beta version of tcpdump. There's
a switch in the makefile, WITH_RADIOTAP
Has anyone made any headway with getting polling(4) to work with a SMP
kernel? Last May this was discussed on here briefly with me, Luigi and
Don Bowman, which seemed to indicate that the majority of what needed
to be fixed to make this work would be some kind of locking in
idle_loop to make s
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:25:13PM -0600, Kevin Day wrote:
>
> Has anyone made any headway with getting polling(4) to work with a SMP
> kernel? Last May this was discussed on here briefly with me, Luigi and
> Don Bowman, which seemed to indicate that the majority of what needed
> to be fixed t
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy Korud wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and
> > ~2000 clients (cable modem network).
> > At full speed (34Mbit) CPU usage is 0% and syst
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy Korud wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and
> > > ~2000 cl
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:46:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy Korud wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > At last
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy Korud wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > > At last I've managed to bu
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:46:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Andriy
In reply to Andriy Korud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>
> Hi,
> At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and
> ~2000 clients (cable modem network).
> At full speed (34Mbit) CPU usage is 0% and system load is 0.0 :-)
>
> The solution was to find proper ip_nat.h file and p
Quoting rmkml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Andriy,
>
> You use ipnat (ipfilter)
>
Well, I'm using ipnat. In order to make it work properly, I have to:
- install ipfilter 3.4.32 (it claims to have some bugs fixed in NAT code, in
stock system you'll find 3.4.31);
- define in _proper_ :-) ip_nat.h:
#
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:03:51PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:56AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, A
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:06:06PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:46:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 12:15:5
On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:12:00PM -0800, Eli Dart wrote:
>
> In reply to Andriy Korud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
>
> >
> > Hi,
> > At last I've managed to build stable NAT on FreeBSD box for 34Mbit link and
> > ~2000 clients (cable modem network).
> > At full speed (34Mbit) CPU usage is 0% and syste
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 01:06:06PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:46:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 10:41:20PM +0200,
Hello!
Some newer machines on our FreeBSD/Linux/Windows network have 1000BaseT
network cards capable of jumbo frames up to 16K (mostly em(4)).
They are plugged into a big switch, which supports jumbo frames up to 9K
on each port.
However, when I try to crank the MTU up on this machines (up to th
< Can different MTUs be mixed on the same wire
No.
-GAWollman
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On 28 Jan, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <
>> Can different MTUs be mixed on the same wire
>
> No.
It's ugly, but I wonder if adding host routes with the -lock -mtu
options might work ...
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/l
20 matches
Mail list logo
