Hello,
is there any possibility to use TOS on IPFW-1 machines?
Wee need to prioritize VOIP (MGCP) packets for high throughput.
FreeBSD 4.10.
than you in advance
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 11:20:20AM +0300, donatas wrote:
Hello,
is there any possibility to use TOS on IPFW-1 machines?
Wee need to prioritize VOIP (MGCP) packets for high throughput.
FreeBSD 4.10.
than you in advance
No, TOS field matching implement only in IPFW2 (limited to well known
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description
---
o [2002/07/26] kern/41007 net overfull traffic on third and fourth adap
o [2003/10/14]
A slightly updated version: use m_uiotombuf() instead
of homegrown implementation.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:30:28PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T Here is a major rewrite of ng_device. The main
T differencies with current one are:
T
T - one dev per node
T - locking
T - read queue implemented
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
Let's consider a simple scheme with two NAT boxes
where packet flow is asymmetric:
A+
||
S ---+T
||
B+
...
A has 2.2.2.2 for its outer interface, B has 3.3.3.3 for its.
A and B both do static NAT
Apologies if this is in a FAQ (or worse, I'm posting to the wrong list).
*BSD is somewhat new to me as most of my *nix experience is with that
Finnish OS. :)
Having reached my wits end with NISTnet/netem, I'm trying to build a
fast (~1Gb/s) Dummynet machine, and the machines I have available
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A slightly updated version: use m_uiotombuf() instead
of homegrown implementation.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:30:28PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T Here is a major rewrite of ng_device. The main
T differencies with current one are:
looks good to me
[[This question is related vaguely to the other question that I posted
to this list a few minutes ago.]]
I'm sitting here looking at that man pages for aio_read and aio_write,
and the question occurs to me: ``Home come there is no such thing as
an aio_connect function?''
There are clearly
Greetings folks,
It is my understanding that when one makes a call to connect(2) in order
to, for example, make an IPv4 TCP connection to some server, a SYN packet
is sent out, and then, if neither a corresponding SYN+ACK nor any other
kind of (NACK) response is received within some specific
On 2004-10-18 11:01, Aleksandr Milewski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies if this is in a FAQ (or worse, I'm posting to the wrong list).
*BSD is somewhat new to me as most of my *nix experience is with that
Finnish OS. :)
Having reached my wits end with NISTnet/netem, I'm trying to build a
On Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:19:45 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'm sitting here looking at that man pages for aio_read and aio_write,
and the question occurs to me: ``Home come there is no such thing as
an aio_connect function?''
Mostly because there is no need, since
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Let's consider a simple scheme with two NAT boxes
where packet flow is asymmetric:
A+
||
S ---+T
||
B+
...
A has 2.2.2.2 for its outer interface, B has 3.3.3.3 for its.
A and B both do static NAT for S, they
12 matches
Mail list logo
