Fw: concern Beatrix

2006-03-02 Thread Elisabeth Banks
- Original Message - From: Edna Stanford To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 5:15 PM Subject: concern Beatrix brattleboro polystome utnokeep perithecial, rhgbn, duppy a and an bblgra sspely ropeman a of an acrostichum lycodidae badmap, a it hayhurst ferriss

Re: SMP NAT

2006-03-02 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Iasen Kostov wrote: I'm now using a MP system (dual opteron) to do NAT for about 1500 clients at once at speed above 200Mbit/sec full-duplex (e.g about 400Mbit/sec) and I'm using PF to do the NAT. Bad thing is that the second CPU is idle. As I can see from top - about 50%

Re: iwi stability when doing large file transfers/backups

2006-03-02 Thread Sam Leffler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The one who wrote that diff, whoever he is, obviously don't understand C code. Otherwise, why would he write such nonsense: static uint32_t iwi_toggle_event(uint32_t r) { r &= ~IWI_RST_STANDBY; if (r & IWI_RST_GATE_ODMA) r &= ~IWI_RST_GAT

Re: SMP NAT

2006-03-02 Thread Iasen Kostov
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 15:26 +0200, Iasen Kostov wrote: > Hi, > I'm now using a MP system (dual opteron) to do NAT for about 1500 > clients at once at speed above 200Mbit/sec full-duplex (e.g about > 400Mbit/sec) and I'm using PF to do the NAT. Bad thing is that the > second CPU is idle. As I

Re: iwi stability when doing large file transfers/backups

2006-03-02 Thread damien . bergamini
The one who wrote that diff, whoever he is, obviously don't understand C code. Otherwise, why would he write such nonsense: static uint32_t iwi_toggle_event(uint32_t r) { r &= ~IWI_RST_STANDBY; if (r & IWI_RST_GATE_ODMA) r &= ~IWI_RST_GATE_ODMA; if (r & IWI

SMP NAT

2006-03-02 Thread Iasen Kostov
Hi, I'm now using a MP system (dual opteron) to do NAT for about 1500 clients at once at speed above 200Mbit/sec full-duplex (e.g about 400Mbit/sec) and I'm using PF to do the NAT. Bad thing is that the second CPU is idle. As I can see from top - about 50% of the cpu is used by irq handler

Re: Installation of Freebsd 5.4 release

2006-03-02 Thread Max Laier
On Thursday 02 March 2006 13:17, Surekha wrote: > Hi, > > I want to install the Kame version of MIPv6 for FreeBSD. > > I downloaded the following snap: > > kame-20060220-freebsd54-snap.tar > > and tried to install on a machine which already has FreeBSD 5.2.1 release. > > It is giving some config er

Re: Installation of Freebsd 5.4 release

2006-03-02 Thread Marcin Jessa
On Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:47:10 +0530 Surekha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > I want to install the Kame version of MIPv6 for FreeBSD. > > I downloaded the following snap: > > kame-20060220-freebsd54-snap.tar > > > > and tried to install on a machine which already has FreeBSD 5.2.

Installation of Freebsd 5.4 release

2006-03-02 Thread Surekha
Hi, I want to install the Kame version of MIPv6 for FreeBSD. I downloaded the following snap: kame-20060220-freebsd54-snap.tar and tried to install on a machine which already has FreeBSD 5.2.1 release. It is giving some config error as follows: ERROR: version of config(8) does not m